The interplay of language norms and usage patterns. Comparing the history of Dutch, English, French and German
References (42)
References
Auer, Peter. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, 7–42. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Auer, Peter. 2011. Dialect vs. standard: A typology of scenarios in Europe. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe, 485–500. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Beal, Joan. 2004. English in modern times, 1700–1945. London: Hodder Arnold.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, Peter. 2004. Languages and communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elspaß, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten. Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Elspaß, Stephan. 2012. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169.Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Sharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Elspaß, Stephan & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Lower class language use in the 19th century. Special issue of Multilingua
.
Fairman, Tony. 2007. Writing and ‘the standard’: England, 1795–1834. In Stephan Elspaß & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Lower class language use in the 19th century, 165–199. Special issue of Multilingua
.
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68. 922–935.
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2010a. Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2012. Standards of English. Codified varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Houdebine-Gravaud, Anne-Marie (ed.). 2002. L’Imaginaire linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Blackwell.
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36. 15–43.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1972. Einleitung. In Reinhart Koselleck, Werner Conze & Otto Brunner (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, xiii-xxvii. Volume 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Kristiansen, Tore & Nikolas Coupland (eds.). 2011. Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Oslo: Novus Press.
Kristiansen, Tore and Stefan Grondelaers (eds.). 2013. Language (de)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Oslo: Novus Press.
Leerssen, Joep. 2006. De bronnen van het vaderland: Taal, literatuur en de afbakening van Nederland 1806-1890. Nijmegen: Vantilt.
Leerssen, Joep. 2007. National thought in Europe: A cultural history. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. 2nd edition. London & New York: Routledge.
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 2012 [1985]. Authority in language: Investigating standard English. London & New York: Routledge.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2012. Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 22–40. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. 2006. Standardisation. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 271–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nobels. Judith. 2013. (Extra)Ordinary letters: A view from below on seventeenth-century Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke van der Wal. 2014. Letters as loot. A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Salmons, Joseph. 2013. A history of German: What the past reveals about today’s language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simons, Tanja. 2013. Ongekend 18e-eeuws Nederlands: Taalvariatie in persoonlijke brieven. Utrecht: LOT.
Vandenbussche, Wim. 2007. Shared standardization factors in the history of sixteen Germanic languages. In Christian Fandrych & Reinier Salverda (eds.). Standard, Variation und Sprachwandel in germanischen Sprachen / Standard, variation and language change in Germanic languages, 25–36. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Wal, Marijke van der. 2006. Onvoltooid verleden tijd. Witte vlekken in de taalgeschiedenis. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.
Watts, Richard J. 2012. Language myths. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 585–606.Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Dourdy, Laura-Maï
2021.
Entend-on vraiment les paysans ? Ce que la variation syntaxique nous dit des représentations sociales dans la littérature des XV e et XVI e siècles.
Cahiers internationaux de sociolinguistique N° 18:1
► pp. 53 ff.
Rutten, Gijsbert
2016.
Historicizing diaglossia.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:1
► pp. 6 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.