Aarts, Flor G.A.M
1986William Cobbett: Radical, reactionary and poor man’s grammarian. Neophilologus 70. 603–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia
2007Prescribed reading: Pronouns and gender in the eighteenth century. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 7, [URL].Google Scholar
Alston, R.C
1965A bibliography of the English language from the invention of printing to the year 1800. Volume 1. Leeds: Arnold and Son.Google Scholar
Ash, John
1760Grammatical institutes: Or grammar, adapted to the genius of the English tongue. Worcester: R. Lewis.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita
2006Precept and practice: The influence of prescriptivism on the English subjunctive. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000, 33–53. Bern etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
2007Robert Lowth and the use of the inflectional subjunctive in eighteenth-century English. In Ute Smit, Stefan Dollinger, Julia Hüttner, Ursula Lutzky & Gunther Kaltenböck (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation, 1–18. Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Baker, Robert
1770Reflections on the English language. London: J. Bell. [2nd ed. 1779].Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W
1996Fowler’s modern English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press [3rd ed.].Google Scholar
Clergy of the Church of England Database
ECEG: Eighteenth-Century English Grammars Database
Compiled by María E. Rodríguez-Gil and Nuria Yáñez-Bouza. [URL].
ECCO: Eighteenth Century Collections Online
Thomson Gale. [URL].
Eekeren, Claire van & Elsbeth Kwant
(eds.) 1999Een alleraangenaamste reys. Leiden: [no publisher].Google Scholar
Fens-de Zeeuw, Lyda
2011Lindley Murray (1745–1826), quaker and grammarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2012Social factors and language change in eighteenth-century England: The case of multiple negation. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113. 292–321.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Philip
1972The new introduction to bibliography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1997 … A construction than which none is more difficult. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present. Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 277–301. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Henstra, Froukje
2014Horace Walpole and his correspondents. Social network analysis in a historical context. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hodson, Jane
2008Joseph Priestley’s two Rudiments of English Grammar: 1761 and 1768. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing, 177–189. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kastelein, Emma
in progress). “Hij gaf mij zijn Engelsche Grammatica Present”: Eighteenth-century letter writing. Hendrik Albert Schultens (1749–1793) and his British acquaintance. Research Master thesis University of Leiden Centre for Linguistics.
Le Faye, Deirdre
2004Jane Austen: A family record [2nd ed.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loonen, Pieter L.M
1990For to learne to buye and sell: Learning English in the Low Dutch area between 1500 and 1800: A critical survey. Groningen: Universiteitsdrukkerij.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert
1762A short introduction to English grammar. London: A. Millar and R. & J. Dodsley. [2nd ed. 1763; 5th ed. Belfast 1765; new ed. 1769; new ed. 1778].Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970English grammatical categories and the tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987The teaching of English from the sixteenth century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittins, W.H., Mary Salu, Mary Edminson & Sheila Coyne
1970Attitudes to English usage [repr. 1975]. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Molencki, Rafał
2003Proscriptive prescriptivists: On the loss of the “pleonastic” perfect infinitive in counterfactual constructions in Late Modern English. In Marina Dossena and Charles Jones (eds.), Insights into Late Modern English, 175–196. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mossner, Ernest C. & Ian S. Ross
(eds.) 1987The Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith. Volume VI. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley
1795English grammar. York: Wilson, Spence and Mawman.Google Scholar
2008Borrowing a Few Passages’: Lady Ellenor Fenn and her use of sources. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing, 223–243. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2003Historical sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
ODNB: The Oxford dictionary of national biography
Online edition, [URL].
OED online: The Oxford English dictionary
Online edition, [URL].
Partridge, Eric
1965Usage and abusage. A guide to good English [6th edition, repr. 1971]. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Percy, Carol
2008Mid-century grammars and their reception in the Monthly Review and the Critical Review . In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing, 125–142. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009Periodical reviews and the rise of prescriptivism: The Monthly (1749–1844) and Critical Review (1756–1817) in the eighteenth century. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Current issues in Late Modern English, 117–150. Bern etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013Linguistic prescriptivism in revolutionary America: Learning from the library of Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826). Paper presented at the 5th International Conference of Late Modern English, 28–30 August 2013.
Picard, Liza
2000Dr. Johnson’s London,London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Postlethwaite, Richard
1795The grammatical art improved: In which the errors of grammarians and lexicographers are exposed. London: J. Parsons.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph
1761The rudiments of English grammar. London: R. Griffiths. [2nd ed. London 1768].Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Gil, María
Straaijer, Robin
2009Deontic and epistemic modals as indicators of prescriptive and descriptive language in the grammars by Joseph Priestley and Robert Lowth. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Current issues in Late Modern English, 57–87. Bern etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011Joseph Priestley, grammarian. Late Modern English normativism and usage in a sociohistorical context. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Suarez, Michael F
2000The business of literature: The book trade in England from Milton to Blake. In David Womersley (ed.), A companion to literature from Milton to Blake, 131–47. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sundby, Bertil, Anne Kari Bjørge & Kari E. Haugland
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1992John Kirkby and The practice of speaking and writing English: Identification of a Manuscript. Leeds Studies in English 23.157–179.Google Scholar
1996Two hundred years of Lindley Murray: An introduction. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Two hundred years of Lindley Murray, 9–25. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
2000Normative studies in England. In Sylvain Auroux, E.F.K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the Language Sciences/Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften/Histoire des Sciences du Langage, Volume 1, 876–887. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008aThe 1760s: Grammars, grammarians and the booksellers. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing, 101–124. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008bThe codifiers and the history of multiple negation in English, or, why were 18th-century grammarians so obsessed with double negation?. In Joan C. Beal, Carmela Nocera, & Massimo Sturiale (eds.), Perspectives on prescriptivism, 197–214. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008cHenry Fowler and his eighteenth-century predecessors. Bulletin of the Henry Sweet Society of the history of linguistic ideas 51. 5–24.Google Scholar
2011The bishop’s grammar. Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012Late Modern English in a Dutch context. English Language and Linguistics 16/2.301–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014In search of Jane Austen: The language of the letters. USA: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vorlat, Emma
1959The sources of Lindley Murray’s “The English Grammar”. Leuvense Bijdragen 48.108–125.Google Scholar
2007On the history of English teaching grammars. In Peter Schmitter (ed.), Sprachtheorien der Neuzeit III/2, 500–525. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Wal, Marijke J. van der
1990Meer der geleerde weereld’ hunne vernuftige gedachten als der Jeugd’ hunne lessen mede te deelen? Vragen over het gebruik van grammatika’s. Vragende wijs. Vragen of tekst, taal en taalgeschiedenis, 223–230. Amsterdam/Atlanta GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah
1784A grammatical institute of the English language. Hartford: Hudson & Goodwin.Google Scholar
Weiner, Edmund
1988On editing a usage guide. In E.G. Stanley & T.F. Hoad (eds.), Words. For Robert Burchfield’s sixty-fifth birthday, 171–183.Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Wouterse, Myrte
2013The Lowth letters: Recovering the reason and relationship behind Robert Lowth’s letters to Hendrik Albert Schultens. Course paper Introduction to Late Modern English, English department, University of Leiden.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria and María Rodríguez-Gil
2013The ECEG Database. Transactions of the Philological Society 111.43–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Rutten, Gijsbert
2016. Historicizing diaglossia. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:1  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Säily, Tanja, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin & Anita Auer
2017. The future of historical sociolinguistics?. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.