References (33)
Primary sources
Bartlett, John Russell. 1848. Dictionary of Americanisms: A glossary of words and phrases usually regarded as peculiar to the United States. NY: Bartlett and Welford.Google Scholar
. 1859. Dictionary of Americanisms: A glossary of words and phrases usually regarded as peculiar to the United States. Second edition: Greatly improved and enlarged. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
. 1877. Dictionary of Americanisms: A glossary of words and phrases usually regarded as peculiar to the United States. Fourth edition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred & Reinhard Heuberger (eds.). 2010. EDD online. University of Innsbruck. [URL]. (August, 2013.)Google Scholar
OUP/PUB/33/2. Prospectus of The English Dialect Dictionary, parts I and II, 1896. EDD archive at Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English dialect dictionary. vols. 6. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Anon. 1849. Review of Dictionary of Americanisms; A Glossary of Words and Phrases, Usually Regarded as Peculiar to the United States by John Russell Bartlett. The North American Review 69(144). 94–110.Google Scholar
Bailey, Richard. 2009. National and regional dictionaries of English. In Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), The Oxford history of English lexicography. Vol. I. General-purpose dictionaries, 279–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackley, William L. 1869. Word gossip: A series of familiar essays on words and their peculiarities. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic G. & Joan Houston Hall. 2001. Americanisms. In John Algeo (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. VI. English in North America, 184–218. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Michael G. 1972. John Russell Bartlett’s Dictionary of Americanisms . American Quarterly 24(2). 228–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Alexander John. 1889. On early English pronunciation. vol. 5. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1890. English dialects, their sounds and homes. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
Ellis, Michael & Michael Montgomery. 2011. About all: Studies in nineteenth-century American English. American Speech 86(3). 340–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grose, Francis. 1787. A provincial glossary: With a collection of local proverbs, and popular superstitions. London: Printed for S. Hooper.Google Scholar
Halliwell, James O. 1847. A dictionary of archaic and provincial words. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
Lowell, James Russell. 1859. Reviews and literary notices. The Atlantic Monthly 4(25). 638–645.Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred 2007. Wright’s English Dialect dictionary computerized: Towards a new source of information. In Päivi Pahta, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Studies in variation, contact and change in English, 2: Towards multimedia in corpus studies. Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL]. (15 June, 2008.)Google Scholar
. 2009. Joseph Wright’s English dialect dictionary and its sources. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Current issues in Late Modern English, 263–282. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred & Reinhard Heuberger. 2007. The architecture of Joseph Wright’s English dialect dictionary: Preparing the computerised version. International Journal of Lexicography 20(4). 355–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, William H. 1808–1818. Review and abstract of the county reports to the board of agriculture, from the several agricultural departments. vols. 5. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown.Google Scholar
Ray, John. 1670. A collection of English proverbs. Cambridge: Printed by John H. [URL]. (May, 2007.)Google Scholar
Ritson, Joseph. 1791. Pieces of ancient popular poetry. London: Printed by C. Clarke.Google Scholar
Ruano-García, Javier. 2012a. Towards an understanding of Joseph Wright’s sources: White 
Kennett’s Parochial antiquities (1695) and the English dialect dictionary . In Manfred 
Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds.), Middle and modern English corpus linguistics: A multi-dimensional approach, 241–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Late Modern Lancashire English in lexicographical context: Representations of Lancashire speech and the English dialect dictionary . English Today 28(4). 60–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Digging into the English dialect dictionary: The contribution of MS Lansd. 1033. International Journal of Lexicography 26(2). 176–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014 . Cumbrian lexis in the English dialect dictionary: William Nicolson’s Glossarium brigantinum (1677) in focus. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 35. 162–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skeat, Rev. Walter W. & John H. Nodal (eds.). 1877. A bibliographical list of the works that have been published, or are known to exist in MS., illustrative of the various dialects of English. London: Published for the EDS by Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Walker Read, Allen. 2005. Words criss-crossing the sea: How words have been borrowed between England and America. American Speech 80(2). 115 134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Richard Grant. 1878. Americanisms. The Atlantic Monthly 41(246). 495– 502.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. Bibliography. In Joseph Wright (ed.), The English dialect dictionary. vol. 1, 1–42. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
. 1898–1905. Preface. In Joseph Wright (ed.), The English dialect dictionary. vol. 1, v–viii. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas. 1857. Dictionary of obsolete and provincial English. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dossena, Marina
2022. “Gems of elocution and humour”. In Earlier North American Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G66],  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.