References (39)
Primary sources
Theal, George McCall. 1897–1905. Records of the Cape Colony (1793–1869). (Volumes 12, 13 and 15). London: Public Record Office.Google Scholar
War and Colonial Department and Colonial Office: Cape of Good Hope (Cape Colony), Original correspondence. TNA. CO 48/41, 48/44, 48/45.
Secondary sources
Archer, Dawn. 2014. Exploring pragmatic phenomena in English historical texts using USAS: The possibilities and the problems. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics, 277–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banton, Mandy. 2008. Administering the Empire, 1801-1968: A Guide to the records of the Colonial Office in the National Archives of the UK. London: Institute of Historical Research/The National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2010. Epistolary presentation rituals: Face-work, politeness, and ritual display in Early Modern Dutch letter-writing. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 37–85. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2011. An evolutionary take on (im)politeness. In Marcel Bax & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Understanding historical (im)politeness. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1/2). 255–282.Google Scholar
Dickason, Graham Brian. 1973. Irish settlers to the Cape: History of the Clanwilliam 1820 settlers from Cork Harbour. Cape Town: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial ommunity. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English, 115–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2010. Building trust through (self-)appraisal in nineteenth-century business correspondence. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English, 191–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The study of correspondence: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspaβ, Stephan. 2012a. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2003. Letters of the English labouring classes 1800–34 and the English language. In Marina Dossena & Charles Jones (eds), Insights into Late Modern English, 265–282. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2010. Changes in the meanings of politeness in eighteenth-century England: Discourse analysis and historical evidence. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 87–116. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Held, Grudrun. 1989. On the role of maximization in verbal politeness. Multilingua 8(2–3). 167–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Held, Gudrun. 2010. Supplica la mia parvidade” Petitions in medieval society – A matter of ritualized politeness? Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11(2). 194–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. ‘In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 175–200. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott, The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 422–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1. 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Brian. 1996. Henry Goulburn 1784–1856. A political biography. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. 2013. Historical politeness. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, Zoë. 2005. Colonial connections 1815–1845: Patronage, the information revolution and the colonial government. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1989. The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 8(2/3). 101–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lester, Alan. 2001. Imperial networks: Creating identities in nineteenth–century South Africa and Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martineau, France. 2013. Written documents: What they tell us about linguistic usage. In 
Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 1981. Longman lexicon of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nash, Marjorie D. 1987. The Settler handbook: A New list of the 1820 Settlers. Diep River: 
Chameleon Press.Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2009. Referential terms and expressions in eighteenth-century letters: A case study on the Lunar Men of Birmigham. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 75–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Politeness. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 419–450. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 541–601. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 2010. Correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavistainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 677–703. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2009. Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Dept., Lancaster University, [URL] (accessed 15 August 2013).
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker. 2010. Expressive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth-century English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, 159–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2013a. British Colonial Office correspondence on the Cape Colony (1820–1821): Metatextual keywords vs. analytic categories. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49(3). 399–428.Google Scholar
. 2013b. 1820 settler petitions in the Cape Colony: Genre dynamics and materiality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14(1). 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013c. Self-reference and ego involvement in the 1820 settler petition as a leaking genre. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert J. Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 201–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Johanna. 2009. Structures and expectations: A systematic analysis of Margaret Paston’s formulaic and expressive language. In Jonathan Culpeper (ed.), Historical sociopragmatics. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). 187–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar