Comparing discourse construction in 17th-century news genres
A case study of murder reports
In this paper I shall examine aspects of discourse construction in 17th-century
crime reports. To this purpose I shall select four news genres which circulated
in the 17th-century news market, reaching a heterogeneous cross-section of
society: news broadside ballads, occasional news pamphlets, newsbooks, and
The London Gazette as an example of an early newspaper. The news genres will
be compared in terms of structure and lexis so as to highlight similarities and
differences in their murder presentation and reporting. By referring to van
Dijk’s (1988) categories of news discourse, I shall focus on the layout, the lead
(which will be called “proto-lead”) and the body of the news. In particular, the
proto-lead and the body of the news will be inspected for authorial comments,
factuality and metadiscourse, their distribution and realisation being indicative
of the news values and ideology behind the news report. Frequent instances of
discourse interrelatedness among the news genres testify to a certain degree of
continuity in terms of authorial intrusion, blending of factuality and sensationalism,
and Puritan stance. At the same time, however, forms of discourse
variation – especially from the second half of the century – highlight changes
in the direction of objectivity, impersonalisation and brevity. The analysis will
show how authorial commentaries and metadiscourse progressively withdraw
from the murder account with a consequential foregrounding of factuality as
the major ingredient of a high-quality report.
References (24)
Corpora, archives and tools
EBBA = English Broadside Ballad Archive. University of California at Santa Barbara. [URL].
EEBO = Early English Books Online. [URL].
LNC = Lancaster Newsbooks Corpus. Compiled by Tony McEnery & Andrew Hardie. [URL].
The London Gazette Archive (1665–). [URL].
The Official King James Bible Online (1611). [URL].
The Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 1674–1913. [URL].
Secondary sources
Bell, Allan. 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Bös, Birte. 2010. Dialogic quotation patterns in historical news report. In Nicholas Brownlees, Gabriella del Lungo & John Denton (eds.), The language of public and private communication in a historical perspective, 228–244. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
Brownlees, Nicholas. 2006. Gerrard Winstanley and radical political discourse in Cromwellian England. In Marina Dossena & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English, 19–39. Bern: Lang.
Brownlees, Nicholas. 2011. The language of periodical news in seventeenth-century England. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Fries, Udo. 2009. Crime and punishment. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Early Modern English news discourse, 13–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fries, Udo. 2012. Newspapers from 1665 to 1765. In Roberta Facchinetti, Nicholas Brownlees, Birte Bös & Udo Fries, News as changing texts: Corpora, methodologies and analysis, 49–89. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lake, Peter. 1994. Deeds against nature: Cheap print, Protestantism and murder in early 17th-century England. In Kevin Sharpe & Peter Lake (eds.), Culture and politics in early Stuart England, 257–283. Houndmills: Macmillan.
Leech, Geoffrey N. & Michael H. Short. 1981. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Martin, Randall. 2008. Women, murder and equity in Early Modern England. New York: Routledge.
Raymond, Joad. 2003. Pamphlets and pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Walsham, Alexandra. 1999. Providence in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watt, Tessa. 1991. Cheap print and popular piety. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Würzbach, Natasha. 1990. The rise of the English street ballad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaret, David. 2000. Origins of democratic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.