Chapter published in:
Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics
Edited by Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Anita Auer
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 7] 2017
► pp. 119
References

References

Anderwald, Lieselotte
2016Language between description and prescription: Verb categories in nineteenth-century grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Frans Hinskens
2005The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 335–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
2013The guidebook to sociolinguistics. Malden & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav & Miriam Meyerhoff
2014Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(1). 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Minna Nevala
2012Socio-cultural processes and the history of English. In Nevalainen & Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 365–391.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana & Wim Vandenbussche
(eds.) 2003Germanic standardizations: Past to present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina
2010Building trust through (self-)appraisal in nineteenth-century business correspondence. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 195), 191–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
(eds.) 2012Letter writing in Late Modern Europe (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan
2012Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In Dossena & Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 45–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2011Dynamic visualizations of language change: Motion charts on the basis of bivariate and multivariate data from diachronic corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4). 435–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinneburg, Alexander, Heikki Mannila, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2007How to handle small samples: Bootstrap and Bayesian methods in the analysis of linguistic change. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(2). 137–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan & Michael Witmore
2010The Hundredth Psalm to the tune of “Green Sleeves”: Digital approaches to Shakespeare’s language of genre. Shakespeare Quarterly 61(3). 357–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. & Brian D. Joseph
2003On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 3–180. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas & Daniela Landert
2015Historical pragmatics and early speech recordings: Diachronic developments in turn-taking and narrative structure in radio talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 79. 22–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja
(ed.) 1996Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding conventions and list of source texts, 3rd edn. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. http://​clu​.uni​.no​/icame​/manuals​/HC​/INDEX​.HTM (10 April, 2017.)Google Scholar
Labov, William
1994Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors (Language in Society 20). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea & Taru Nordlund
2012Performing identities and interaction through epistolary formulae. In Dossena & Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 65–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Terttu Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Kai Puolamäki
& Heikki Mannila 2016Significance testing of word frequencies in corpora. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31(2). 374–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Tanja Säily
Terttu Nevalainen. 2012. CEECing the baseline: Lexical stability and significant change in a historical corpus. In Jukka Tyrkkö, Matti Kilpiö, Terttu Nevalainen & Matti Rissanen (eds.) Outposts of historical corpus linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a proliferation of resources Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 10 Helsinki VARIENG http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/10​/lijffijt​_saily​_nevalainen/ 10 April, 2017
Lyding, Verena, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski, Henrik Dittmann & Chris Culy
2012Visualising linguistic evolution in academic discourse. In Miriam Butt, Sheelagh Carpendale, Gerald Penn, Jelena Prokić & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Proceedings of the EACL 2012 joint workshop of LINGVIS & UNCLH, 44–48. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, Eetu, Tanja Säily & Terttu Nevalainen
2016Khepri – a modular view-based tool for exploring (historical sociolinguistic) data. In Maciej Eder & Jan Rybicki, (eds.), Digital Humanities 2016: Conference abstracts, 269–272. Kraków: Jagiellonian University & Pedagogical University.Google Scholar
Mannila, Heikki, Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2013Quantifying variation and estimating the effects of sample size on the frequencies of linguistic variables. In Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 337–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli
2007Annotating variational space over time. In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds.), Annotating variation and change (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1). Helsinki: VARIENG. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/01​/meurman​-solin/ (10 April, 2017.)Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna & Arja Nurmi
2013The Corpora of Early English Correspondence (CEEC400). In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Principles and practices for the digital editing and annotation of digital data (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 14). Helsinki: Varieng. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/14​/nevala​_nurmi/ (10 April, 2017.)Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2012New perspectives, theories and methods: Historical sociolinguistics. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 34.2), 1438–1457. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2015What are historical sociolinguistics? Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2). 243–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
(eds.) 2012The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily
(eds.) Forthcoming Patterns of change in 18th-century English: A sociolinguistic approach Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
1994Sociolinguistics and language history: The Helsinki Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics 13. 135–143.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1996aSociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 15). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1996bThe Corpus of Early English Correspondence. In Nevalainen & Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 39–54.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg 2003Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2012Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 22–40. Malden & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg & Heikki Mannila
2011The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23(1). 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Gijsbert Rutten
(eds.) 2012Comparative historical sociolinguistics. A special issue of Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113(3).Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Heli Tissari
2010Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change (Studies in English Language), 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna
2012Social roles, identities, and networks. In Nevalainen & Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 412–421.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna, Minna Nevala & Arja Nurmi
2009The language of daily life in the history or English. Studying how macro meets micro. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800) (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 183), 1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohrdantz, Christian, Annette Hautli, Thomas Mayer, Miriam Butt, Daniel A. Keim & Frans Plank
2011Towards tracking semantic change by visual analytics. In Yuji Matsumoto & Rada Mihalcea (eds.), HLT ’11: proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: short papers – volume 2, 305–310. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rohrdantz, Christian, Andreas Niekler, Annette Hautli, Miriam Butt & Daniel A. Keim
2012Lexical semantics and distribution of suffixes: A visual analysis. In Miriam Butt, Sheelagh Carpendale, Gerald Penn, Jelena Prokić & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Proceedings of the EACL 2012 joint workshop of LINGVIS & UNCLH, 7–15. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1982Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke J. van der Wal
2014Letters as loot. A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert, Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche
(eds.) 2014Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Säily, Tanja
2014Sociolinguistic variation in English derivational productivity: Studies and methods in diachronic corpus linguistics (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XCIV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja, Terttu Nevalainen & Harri Siirtola
2011Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(2). 167–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Säily, Tanja & Jukka Suomela
2009Comparing type counts: The case of women, men and -ity in early English letters. In Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds.), Corpus linguistics: Refinements and reassessments (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 69), 87–109. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sairio, Anni
2009Language and letters of the Bluestocking network. Sociolinguistic issues in eighteenth-century epistolary English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LXXV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Siirtola, Harri, Poika Isokoski, Tanja Säily & Terttu Nevalainen
2016Interactive text visualization with Text Variation Explorer. In Ebad Banissi, Mark W. McK. Bannatyne, Fatma Bouali, Remo Burkhard, John Counsell, Urska Cvek, Martin J. Eppler, Georges Grinstein, Wei Dong Huang, Sebastian Kernbach, Chun-Cheng Lin, Feng Lin, Francis T. Marchese, Chi Man Pun, Muhammad Sarfraz, Marjan Trutschl, Anna Ursyn, Gilles Venturini, Theodor G. Wyeld & Jian J. Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Information Visualisation (IV 2016), 330–335. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siirtola, Harri, Tanja Säily, Terttu Nevalainen & Kari-Jouko Räihä
2014Text Variation Explorer: Towards interactive visualization tools for corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(3). 417–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis
2014Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90(1). 90–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1987The auxiliary do in eighteenth-century English. A sociohistorical linguistic approach. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2008Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England (Topics in English Linguistics 59). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Eighteenth-century English normative grammars and their readers. In Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective, 129–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke J. & Gijsbert Rutten
2013Ego-documents in a historical-sociolinguistic perspective. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Touching the past. Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 1), 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, Turo, Tanja Säily & Mikko Hakala
2013Variation in pronoun frequencies in early English letters: Gender-based or relationship-based? In Jukka Tyrkkö, Olga Timofeeva & Maria Salenius (eds.), Ex philologia lux: Essays in honour of Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XC), 233–255. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Wood, Johanna L.
2004Text in context: A critical discourse analysis approach to Margaret Paston. In Terttu Nevalainen & Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen (eds.), Letter writing. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(2). 229–254.Google Scholar