Discord in eighteenth-century genteel correspondence
This chapter studies representations of discord in the correspondence of eighteenth-century English gentry. The study aims at charting various ways in which the upper classes negotiated conflict situations and cases where norms of society were challenged, by mapping the social meaning of relevant labels according to the three themes of discord, disgrace, and disorder. The methodological starting point is in Nevalainen and Tissari’s (2010) study of the shifting cultural keywords courtesy, civility, and politeness, which we also study here along with the lexemes discord, disgrace, embarrassment, mortification, and shame. The results show that civility, politeness, and shame all function as tools for social control and critical evaluation of self and others.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Polite society of eighteenth-century England
- 2.2Discord in the eighteenth century: Linguistic and socio-cultural background
- 3.Relationships between politeness and discord: Methods
- 3.1Socio-cultural embedding of politeness terminology (Nevalainen & Tissari 2010)
- 3.2Discord terminology in the current study
- 4.Case studies: Discord in eighteenth-century correspondence
- 4.1Discord proper
- 4.2Disgrace
- 4.3Disorder
- 5.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References
Primary sources
Bluestocking Corpus
Compiled by
Anni Sairio at the Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.
CEECE
Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension. Compiled by
Terttu Nevalainen,
Helena Raumolin-Brunberg,
Samuli Kaislaniemi,
Mikko Laitinen,
Minna Nevala,
Arja Nurmi,
Minna Palander-Collin,
Tanja Säily and
Anni Sairio at the Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.
Secondary sources
Briggs, Asa
1959 The age of improvement. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bryson, Anna
1998 From courtesy to civility: Changing codes of conduct in early modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, Peter
1992 The language of orders in early modern Europe. In
Michael L. Bush (ed.),
Social orders and social classes in Europe since 1500: Studies in social stratification, 1–12. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, Peter
2000 A civil tongue: Language and politeness in early modern Europe. In
Peter Burke,
Brian Harrison &
Paul Slack (eds.),
Civil histories: Essays presented to Sir Keith Thomas, 31–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Anna
2004 The sexual politics of the British Constitution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davison, Kate
2014 Occasional politeness and gentleman’s laughter in 18th-century England.
The Historical Journal 57. 921–945.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickie, Simon
2003 Hilarity and pitilessness in the mid-eighteenth century: English jestbook humor.
Eighteenth-Century Studies 37. 1–22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope
2000 Linguistic variation as social practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope
2008 Variation and the indexical field.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–476.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope
2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.
Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
French, H. R
2000 Social status, localism and the ‘middle sort of people’ in England 1620–1750.
Past and Present 166. 66–99.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gatrell, Vic
2006 City of laughter: Sex and satire in eighteenth-century London. New York: Walker & Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grundy, Isobel
1999 Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jucker, Andreas H
2012 Changes in politeness cultures. In
Terttu Nevalainen &
Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 422–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kakavá, Christina
2001 Discourse and conflict. In
Deborah Schiffrin,
Deborah Tannen &
Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.),
The handbook of discourse analysis, 650–670. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kinservik, Matthew J
2007 Sex, scandal and celebrity in late eighteenth-century England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A
2004 Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntosh, Carey
1998 The evolution of English prose, 1700–1800: Style, politeness, and print culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munck, Thomas
2000 The enlightenment: A comparative social history 1721–1794. London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevala, Minna
2010 Keeping up appearances: Face work in self- and addressee-oriented reference. In
Jonathan Culpeper &
Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.),
Historical (im)politeness, 147–173. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, Terttu & Heli Tissari
2010 Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling. In
Raymond Hickey (ed.),
Eighteenth-century English: ideology and change, 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plax, Julie-Anne
2013 Watteau’s witticisms: Visual humor and sociability. In
Elizabeth C. Mansfield &
Kelly Malone (eds.),
Seeing satire in the eighteenth century, 63–80. Oxford: SVEC.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Porter, Roy
1990 English society in the eighteenth century. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Porter, Roy
2000 Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Royle, Edward
1987 Modern Britain: A social history 1750–1985. London: Edward Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sairio, Anni
Forthcoming.
‘Now to my distress’: Shame discourse in eighteenth-century English letters. A special issue of
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
ed. by
Matylda Włodarczyk &
Irma Taavitsainen
Scheff, Thomas J
1994 Microsociology: Discourse, emotion and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria
2012 Disagreements, politeness and face.
Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1554–1564.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker
2010 Expressive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth-century English. In
Raymond Hickey (ed.),
Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, 159–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun A
2009 Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard
2002 From polite language to educated language: The re-emergence of an ideology. In
Richard J. Watts &
Peter Trudgill (eds.),
Alternative histories of English, 155–172. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, R. K
1980 Modern England: From the eighteenth century to the present. New York: Harper & Row.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Ben
2007 Decency and disorder 1789–1837. London: Faber & Faber.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Withington, Phil
2007 Company and sociability in early modern England.
Social History 32. 291–307.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Jucker, Andreas
2020.
Politeness in the History of English,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jucker, Andreas H.
2024.
Conduct politeness versus etiquette politeness: a terminological distinction.
Journal of Politeness Research 20:1
► pp. 87 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.