Part of
Exploring Future Paths for Historical SociolinguisticsEdited by Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Anita Auer
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 7] 2017
► pp. 303–325
Edited by Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Anita Auer
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 7] 2017
► pp. 303–325
Revisiting weak ties
Using present-day social media data in variationist studies
This article makes use of big and rich present-day data to revisit the social network model in sociolinguistics. This model predicts that mobile individuals with ties outside a home community and subsequent loose-knit networks tend to promote the diffusion of linguistic innovations. The model has been applied to a range of small ethnographic networks. We use a database of nearly 200,000 informants who send micro-blog messages on Twitter. We operationalize networks using two ratio variables; one of them is a truly weak tie and the other a slightly stronger one. The results show that there is a straightforward increase of innovative behavior in the truly weak tie network, but the data indicate that innovations also spread under conditions of stronger networks, given that the network size is large enough. On the methodological level, our approach opens up new horizons in using big and often freely available data in sociolinguistics, both past and present.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 3.Material and methods
- 4.Results and observations
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
-
Acknowledgements -
References
References (27)
Barbaresi, Adrien. 2016. Collection and indexation of Tweets with a geographical focus. In Piotr Bański, Marc Kupietz, Harald Lüngen, Andreas Witt, Adrien Barbaresi, Hanno Biber, Evelyn Breiteneder & Simon Clematide (eds.), Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016). Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-4), 24–27. Paris: ELRA. <hal-01323274gt;
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters 1421–1503. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 
Coats, Steven. 2015. Gender and lexical type frequencies in Finland Twitter English. A paper presented at the d2e conference, Oct 2015, University of Helsinki.
Eisenstein, Jacob, Brendan O’Connor, Noah A. Smith & Eric P. Xing. 2012. Mapping the geographical diffusion of new words. Computing Research Repository (CoRR), arXiv preprint. arXiv:1210.5268v3.
European Journal of English Studies. 2000. A special issue on Social Network Analysis and the History of English. European Journal of English Studies 4(3).
Fekete, Jean-Daniel, Jarke J. van Wijk, John T. Stasko & Chris North. 2008. The value of information visualization. In Andreas Kerren, John T. Stasko, Jean-Daniel Fekete & Chris North (eds.), Information visualization: Human-centered issues and perspectives, 1–18. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2000.
The Spectator, the politics of social networks, and language standardization in eighteenth century England. In Laura Wright (ed.), The development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodchild, Michael. 2013. The quality of big (geo)data. Dialogues in Human Geography 3(3). 280–284.
Graham, Mark, Scott Hale & Devin Gaffney. 2013. Where in the world are you? Geolocation and language identification in Twitter. Computing Research Repository (CoRR), arXiv preprint. arXiv:1308.0683.
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78. 1360–1380.
Huang, Yuan, Diansheng Guo, Alice Kasakoff & Jack Grieve. 2016. Understanding US regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59. 244–255.
Krishnamurthy, Balachander, Philippa Gill & Martin Alitt. 2008. A few chirps about Twitter. In Christos Faloutsos, Thomas Karagiannis & Pablo Rodriguez (eds.), Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks (WOSN ’08), 19–24. New York: ACM.
Laitinen, Mikko, Jonas Lundberg, Magnus Levin & Alexander Lakaw. Forthcoming. Creating the Nordic Tweet Stream: A real-time monitor corpus of rich and big data. Journal of Universal Computer Science.
Li, Wei. 1994. Three generations, two languages, one family. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milroy, Lesley. 2004. Social networks. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 549–570. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1978. Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Peter Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 19–36. London: Arnold.
. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21. 339–384.
Morstatter, Fred, Jürgen Pfeffer, Huan Liu & Kathleen M. Carley. 2013. Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose. Computing Research Repository (CoRR), arXiv preprint. arXiv:1306.5204.
Murray, Stephen O. 1993. Network determination of linguistic variables? American Speech 68(2). 161–177.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2000. Mobility, social networks and language change in Early Modern England. European Journal of English Studies 4(3). 253–264.
Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg & Heikki Mannila. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time-depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23(1). 1–43.
Mannila, Heikki, Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2013. Quantifying variation and estimating the effects of sample size on the frequencies of linguistic variables. In Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 337–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pahta, Päivi & Irma Taavitsainen. 2011. English in intranational public discourse. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 605–620. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1998. Social factors and pronominal change in the seventeenth century: The Civil-War effect? In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 361–388. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sairio, Anni. 2009. Language and letters of the Bluestocking network: Sociolinguistic issues in eighteenth-century epistolary English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LXXV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Scheffler, Tatjana. 2014. A German Twitter snapshot. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), 2284–2289. Paris: ELRA.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Fatemi, Masoud, Kostiantyn Kucher, Mikko Laitinen & Pasi Franti
2021. 2021 Swedish Workshop on Data Science (SweDS), ► pp. 1 ff. 
Li, Wei
2021. The dynamics of contacts and multilingual practices in the Chinese community in Britain. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 31:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
Tyrkkö, Jukka, Magnus Levin & Mikko Laitinen
2021. Actuallyin Nordic tweets. World Englishes
Laitinen, Mikko
2020. Empirical perspectives on English as a lingua franca (ELF) grammar. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 427 ff.
Laitinen, Mikko, Masoud Fatemi & Jonas Lundberg
2020. Size Matters: Digital Social Networks and Language Change. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3
Laitinen, Mikko & Jonas Lundberg
2020. ELF, Language Change, and Social Networks. In Language Change, ► pp. 179 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.