Part of
Patterns of Change in 18th-century English: A sociolinguistic approachEdited by Terttu Nevalainen, Minna Palander-Collin and Tanja Säily
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8] 2018
► pp. 197–218
Edited by Terttu Nevalainen, Minna Palander-Collin and Tanja Säily
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8] 2018
► pp. 197–218
Chapter 12Change or variation? Productivity of the suffixes ‑ness and ‑ity
Article outline
- 12.1Introduction
- 12.2Theoretical background
- 12.3Previous research
- 12.4Research questions
- 12.5Results
- 12.5.1Overall trends
- 12.5.2Social categories
- 12.5.3Case studies
- 12.5.3.1Individual outliers
- 12.5.3.2Royalty vs. the Clifts
- 12.5.3.3Semantics
- 12.5.4Normative grammar
- 12.6Conclusion
-
Note
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Säily, Tanja, Turo Vartiainen, Harri Siirtola & Terttu Nevalainen
2024. Changing styles of letter-writing?. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 154 ff. 
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, Tanja Säily & Jukka Suomela
2022. New methods for analysing diachronic suffix competition across registers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 506 ff.
De Smet, Hendrik
2020. What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.