Chapter published in:
Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary perspectives
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone
[Argumentation in Context 10] 2017
► pp. 3956
Barth, E., & Krabbe E. C. W.
(1982) From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bermejo-Luque, L.
(2004) Toulmin’s model of argument and the question of relativism. Informal Logic 24, 169–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J. A.
(2012) Groundwork in the theory of argumentation. Springer: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, L.
(1895) What the Tortoise Said to Achilles. Mind 4, 278–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst R.
(1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: cambridge university press.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. B.
(2005) Systematizing Toulmin’s warrants: An epistemic approach. In D. Hitchcock, & D. Farr (Eds), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University. Hamilton: OSSA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Govier, T.
(2011) Conductive arguments: Overview of the symposium. In J. A. Blair & R. H. Johnson (Eds.), Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning (pp. 262–276). London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L.
(1970) Fallacies. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, D.
(2007) ‘On the Generality of Warrants’. http://​www​.humanities​.mcmaster​.ca​/∼hitchckd/.
van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe E. C. W.
(2013) The burden of criticism: Consequences of taking a critical stance. Argumentation 27, 201–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krabbe, E. C. W.
(1992) So what? Profiles for relevance criticism in persuasion dialogues. Argumentation 6, 271–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The Problem of Retraction in Critical Discussion. Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 127, 141–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A.
(2007) About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies. Informal Logic 27, 27–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) That’s No Argument! The Dialectic of Non-Argumentation. Synthese 192(4), 1173–1197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leon, M.
(2013) House Speaker’s Commitment to the Party of Stupid. MAL Contends …, March 17, 2013 (MAL Contends: http://​malcontends​.blogspot​.com).
Verheij, B.
(2006) Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Argumentation 19, 347–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. N.
(1990) What is reasoning? What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy 8, 399–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W.
(1995) commitment in dialogue basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N., Reed, C., & Macagno, F.
(2008) Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. N., & Sartori, G.
(2013) Teleological justification of argumentation schemes. Argumentation 27, 111–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willer, M.
(2010) New surprises for the Ramsey test. Synthese 176, 291–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar