Chapter published in:
Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary perspectives
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone
[Argumentation in Context 10] 2017
► pp. 217337
References

References

Abraham, L.
(2009) Effectiveness of Cartoons As a Uniquely Visual Medium for Orienting Social Issues. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 11 (2), 117–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle
(1991) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by G. A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
(2010) Strategic Manoeuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van (2013) Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understanding and critical assessment. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 141–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E.
(2009) Multiliteracies: how readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8 (2), 181–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T.
(2012) Strategisch manoeuvreren in politieke cartoons met een visuele scenariometafoor. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34, 2, 199–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T., Groarke, L. & Plug, H. J.
(2011) Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. T. Feteris, B. J. Garssen & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.) Keeping in Touch with Pragma-dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groarke, L.
(2002) Towards a Pragma-dialectics of Visual Argument. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.) Advances in Pragma-dialectics (pp. 137–152). Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
(2015) Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter? Argumentation, 29, 133–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, B.
(1989) Richard Nixon as Pinocchio, Richard II, and Santa Claus: The Use of Allusion in Political Satire. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 51 (1). (Feb. 1989), 165–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, M.
(2001) Cartoonists and political cynicism. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, vol. 2 (1), 27–50.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. L.
(2011) Imagining Obama: Reading Overtly and Inferentially Racist Images of our 44th President, 2007–2008, Communication Studies, 62(4), 389–405.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & and Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, C.
(2004) Drawn to the Extremes. The Use and Abuse of Editorial Cartoons. New York: Columbia University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, H., & Phiddian, R.
(2004a) Censorship and the political cartoonist. Refereed paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide.
Manning, H. & Phiddian, R.
(2004b) In defence of the political cartoonists’ licence to mock. Australian Review of Public Affairs, 5 (1), 25–42.Google Scholar
Medhurst, M. J. & DeSousa, M. A.
(1981) Political Cartoons as a Rhetorical Form: A Taxonomy of Graphic Discourse. Communication Monographs 48, 197–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plug, H. J.
(2013) Manoeuvring strategically in political cartoons: transforming visualizations of metaphors. In H. van Belle & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), Verbal and Visual Rhetoric in a Media World (pp. 433–445). Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Plug, H. J., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2008) Apologies for Metaphors as a Strategic Manoeuvre in Political Debates. In: L. Dam, L. Holmgreen, & J. Strunck (Eds.). Rhetorical Aspects of Discourses in Present-day Society (p. 102–116). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Quintilian
(2001) The Orator’s Education. Edited and translated by Donald A. Russell. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A.
(2009) Visual Metaphoric Conceptualization in Editorial Cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.) Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 221–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tseronis, A. (2013) Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying. OSSA Conference Archive. Paper 163. http://​scholar​.uwindsor​.ca​/ossaarchive​/OSSA10​/papersandcommentaries​/163.
Walter, A. S., & van Holsteyn, J. J. M.
(2007) ‘Pim in prenten. De weergave van Pim Fortuyn in politieke tekeningen’. In G. Voerman, (Ed.), Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 2005 (Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen) (pp. 176–205). Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen/DNPP.Google Scholar
Werner, W.
(2004) On political cartoons and social studies textbooks: visual analogies intertextuality and cultural memory. Canadian Social Studies, 38 (2), 1–12.Google Scholar