Cover not available
Part of
Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary perspectives
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone
[Argumentation in Context 10] 2017
► pp. 317–338

Chapter 13
Attacks on the cartoonist’s strategic manoeuvring

An argumentative analysis of criticism on political cartoons

Political cartoons may be understood as instances of visual or multimodal argumentative discourse. When a political cartoon is a subject of controversy, the criticism of the cartoon may therefore be aimed at the argumentation. For the purpose of a systematic analysis of visual and multimodal argumentation that gives rise to controversy, I make use of insights of the extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory by van Eemeren (2010). The analysis provides a starting point to determine what aspect of strategic manoeuvring is criticised and to specify the derailment of strategic manoeuvring the cartoonist is accused of. Accordingly, the analysis facilitates a refined evaluation of the accusation in which general soundness conditions are amended or supplemented by relevant institutional conditions. In this study I will concentrate on controversies on political cartoons that make use of visual metaphors to scrutinize politicians’ behaviour or actions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The structure of the argumentation underlying the political cartoon
  • 3.Criticism aimed at the visual metaphor
  • 4.Criticism aimed at the standpoint
  • 5.Criticism aimed at the sub-standpoint
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.14plu
References (25)
References
Abraham, L. (2009). Effectiveness of Cartoons As a Uniquely Visual Medium for Orienting Social Issues. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 11 (2), 117–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristotle (1991). On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by G. A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2013). Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understanding and critical assessment. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2009). Multiliteracies: how readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8 (2), 181–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T. (2012). Strategisch manoeuvreren in politieke cartoons met een visuele scenariometafoor. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34, 2, 199–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T., Groarke, L. & Plug, H. J. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. T. Feteris, B. J. Garssen & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.) Keeping in Touch with Pragma-dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groarke, L. (2002). Towards a Pragma-dialectics of Visual Argument. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.) Advances in Pragma-dialectics (pp. 137–152). Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
(2015). Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter? Argumentation, 29, 133–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grofman, B. (1989). Richard Nixon as Pinocchio, Richard II, and Santa Claus: The Use of Allusion in Political Satire. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 51 (1). (Feb., 1989), 165–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogan, M. (2001). Cartoonists and political cynicism. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, vol. 2 (1), 27–50.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. L. (2011). Imagining Obama: Reading Overtly and Inferentially Racist Images of our 44th President, 2007–2008, Communication Studies, 62(4), 389–405.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, C. (2004). Drawn to the Extremes. The Use and Abuse of Editorial Cartoons. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, H., & Phiddian, R. (2004a). Censorship and the political cartoonist. Refereed paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide.
Manning, H. & Phiddian, R. (2004b). In defence of the political cartoonists’ licence to mock. Australian Review of Public Affairs, 5 (1), 25–42.Google Scholar
Medhurst, M. J. & DeSousa, M. A. (1981) Political Cartoons as a Rhetorical Form: A Taxonomy of Graphic Discourse. Communication Monographs 48, 197–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plug, H. J. (2013). Manoeuvring strategically in political cartoons: transforming visualizations of metaphors. In H. van Belle & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), Verbal and Visual Rhetoric in a Media World (pp. 433–445). Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Plug, H. J., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2008). Apologies for Metaphors as a Strategic Manoeuvre in Political Debates. In: L. Dam, L. Holmgreen, & J. Strunck (Eds.). Rhetorical Aspects of Discourses in Present-day Society (p. 102–116). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Quintilian (2001). The Orator’s Education. Edited and translated by Donald A. Russell. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A. (2009). Visual Metaphoric Conceptualization in Editorial Cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.) Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 221–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tseronis, A. (2013). Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying. OSSA Conference Archive. Paper 163. [URL].
Walter, A. S., & van Holsteyn, J. J. M. (2007). ‘Pim in prenten. De weergave van Pim Fortuyn in politieke tekeningen’. In G. Voerman, (Ed.), Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 2005 (Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen) (pp. 176–205). Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen/DNPP.Google Scholar
Werner, W. (2004). On political cartoons and social studies textbooks: visual analogies intertextuality and cultural memory. Canadian Social Studies, 38 (2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Săftoiu, Răzvan & Noémi Tudor
2023. Ethnic humour in cartoons. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.