Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., & Schackleton, M. (2007). The European Parliament. London: John Harper Publishing.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Garssen, B. (2010). In varietate concordia – United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19–37.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2005). Argumentation and debate. Critical thinking for reasoned decisions making. Boston: Wadsworth.
Ihnen Jory, C. (2012). Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British parliament. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Klopf, D. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1969). The elements of debate. Arco: New York.
Shaw, W. C. (1916). Systematic analysis of debating problems. Journal of Speech Communication, 2, 344–351.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
van Eemeren, Frans & Bart Garssen
2023. A functional diversity of argumentative styles. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 510 ff.
2020. SVP – FPÖ. Argumentationen zweier rechtspopulistischer Parteien im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 50:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
2018. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 149 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 111 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2019. Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion. Argumentation 33:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.