Chapter published in:
Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional contextEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Argumentation in Context 11] 2017
► pp. 125–138
Chapter 8Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions
Article outline
- 8.1Introduction
- 8.2Legal justification and the application of legal rules in clear cases and hard cases
- 8.3Prototypical argumentative patterns in clear cases and hard cases
- 8.4Prototypical argumentative patterns in hard cases about the meaning of a legal rule
- 8.4.1Argumentation in a hard case in which the court makes an exception to a legal rule
- 8.4.2Argumentation in a hard case in which the court gives an interpretation of a legal rule
- 8.5Conclusion
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.08fet
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.08fet
References
Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., & Sartor, G.
Eemeren, F. H. van
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Garssen, B.
Feteris, E. T.
(2004) Rational reconstruction of legal argumentation and the role of arguments from consequences. In A. Soeteman (Ed.), Pluralism and law. Proceedings of the 20th IVR World Congress, Amsterdam, 2001. Volume 4: Legal Reasoning (pp. 69–78). Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, ARSP Beiheft Nr. 91.
Garssen, B.
Hage, J. C.
MacCormick, N., & Summers, R.
Eds. Interpreting statutes. A comparative study Aldershot Dartmouth
Prakken, H.
Prakken, H., & Sartor, G.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
van Eemeren, Frans H.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.