Chapter published in:
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 159176
References

References

Atienza, M.
(2005) Reasoning and Legislation. In Luc J. Wintgens (Ed.), The theory and practice of Legislation. Essays in Legisprudence. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 297–317.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst
(1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions towards solving conflicts of opinion. De Gruyter/Foris, Berlin/ Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, communication and fallacies. A pragma-dialectic perspective. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser
(1999) Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse, Discourse Studies 1, pp. 479–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Theoretical construction and argumentative reality. An analytical model of critical discussion and conventionalized types of argumentative activity. In: D. Hitchcock and D. Farr (Eds.), The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University 18–21 May 2005, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
(2006) Strategic maneuvering: a synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation, 20, 381–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Seizing the occasion: parameters for analysing ways of strategic manoeuvring. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard and B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. pp. 375–381.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., P. Houtlosser and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans
(2007) Argumentative indicators in discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eijlander, P.
(2004) Gelegenheidswetgeving. Een rechtsstaat onwaardig? Ars Aequi, 53, 7/8, 484–491.Google Scholar
European Parliament (2007)
Rules of procedure of the European Parliament, 16th Edition. Brussels: E.P.
Freeley, A. J. and D. L. Steinberg
(2009) Argumentation and debate. Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. 12 th edition. United States: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.
(1964) The Morality of Law. (pp. vi, 202).Yale University Press 1964 Google Scholar
Garssen, B.
(1997) Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Hill, B. and R. W. Leeman
(1997) The art and practice of argumentation and debate. California: Mayfield publishing company.Google Scholar
Ilie, C.
(2003) Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of language and Politics 2, 1, 71–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N.
(2005) Legislative Deliberation: Notes from the European Parliament. In Luc J. Wintgens (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Legislation. Essays in Legisprudence. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 285–296.Google Scholar
Osborn, M. and S. Osborn
(2005) Public Speaking. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Plug, H. J.
(2009) The argumentative use of examples: the Burqa-ban case. In: E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis and H. J. Plug (Ed.). Argumentation and the application of legal rules. Amsterdam: Rozenberg. Google Scholar
(2010) The strategic use of argumentation from example in plenary debates in the European Parliament. Controversia. International Journal of Debate and Democratic Renewal, 7 (1), pp. 38-56.Google Scholar
Plug, H. J. and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans
(2008) Apologies for Metaphors as a Strategic Manoeuvre in Political Debates. In L. Dam, L. Holmgreen and J. Strunck (Eds.), Rhetorical aspects of discourses in present-day society. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Proksch, S. and J. B. Slapin
(2008) ‘Position-Taking in European Parliament Speeches’. Presentation Midwest Science Association Chicago.
Rendall, S.
(1992) Examples, Counterexamples (Review: Exemplum: The Rhetoric of Example in Early Modern France and Italy by John D. Lyons). Comparative Literature, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 59–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallton, D. H.
(1998) Ad hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D.
(2008) Strategic maneuvring in political argumentation. Argumentation, vol. 22, no. 3, 317–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Strategic Maneuvering for Political Change [Argumentation in Context, 16], Crossref logo
Omar, Ahmed Abdulhameed
2019. The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2  pp. 214 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.