Cover not available
Part of
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 269–280

Chapter 15
Strategic manoeuvring with hyperbole in political debate

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Characteristics and functions of hyperbole
  • 3.Strategic function of hyperbole
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.15sno
References (23)
References
Cano Mora, L. (2006). ‘How to Make a Mountain out of a Molehill’. A Corpus-Based Pragmatic and Conversational Analysis Study of Hyperbole in Interaction. Valencia: University of Valencia Press.
Cicero. (1976). De Inventione; De Optimo Genere Oratorum, Topica. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. (1981). De Ratione Dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium). Translated by H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, C. (2011). Hyperbole in English. A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (2010). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, and Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies; A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van and Houtlosser, P. (2002). “Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, edited by F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser, 119–130. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahnestock, J. and Tonnard, Y. (2011). “Amplification in Strategic Maneuvering.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, edited by E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans, 103–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, R. J. (1988). Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998). Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden/Boston/Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1984). “Intensity.” In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, edited by D. Schiffrin, 43–70. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. (2004). “‘There’s Millions of Them’: Hyperbole in Everyday Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 149–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (1982). “On the Semantic of Overstatement.” In Sprache Beschreiben und Erklären. Linguistisches Kolloquium 16, 1981, Kiel, edited by K. Detering, 168–179. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Quintillian. (1920). Institutio Oratoria (Vols 1–4). Translated by H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M. and Kreuz, R. J. (1994).“Why Do People Use Figurative Language?” American Psychological Society 5: 159–163.Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2008). “Manoeuvring Strategically with Metonymy in the Confrontation and Argumentation Stages of a Discussion.” In Understanding Argumentation: Work in Progress, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams and I. Z. Zagar, 69–77. Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg.Google Scholar
2009a. “Manoeuvring Strategically with Rhetorical Questions.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues, edited by F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 15–23. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b. “The Contribution of Praeteritio to Arguers′ Confrontational Strategic Manoeuvres.” In Examining Argumentation in Context; Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, 241–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitzbardt, H. (1963). Overstatement and understatement in British and American English. Philologica Pragensia, 6, 277–286.Google Scholar
Ueding, G., ed. (1998). Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Boogaart, Ronny
2020. Expressives in Argumentation: The Case of Apprehensive Straks (‘Shortly’) in Dutch. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Golubeva, Tatyana
2019. Hyperbole as a Persuasion Tool in Political Discourse (The Case of British Politicians’ Speech). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije :3 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.