Cover not available
Part of
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 335–359

Chapter 18
Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework

Strategic manoeuvring in the front covers of The Economist

In this chapter, I argue that the theoretical assumptions and concrete analytical concepts of Pragma-dialectics constitute a fertile ground for the study of visual and multimodal argumentation. This is primarily because the pragma-dialectical theory takes a procedural, pragmatic and functional approach to the study of argumentation which allows it to incorporate insights from the growing field of multimodal discourse analysis. Within the pragma-dialectical approach, next to the evidentiary function of visual images other argumentative functions can be researched, such as the use of images to advance a standpoint, to criticize, to explain and to draw attention to various aspects of the argumentative procedure. It is also argued that Pragma-dialectics can accommodate insights from multimodal analysis in order to account for the meaning conveyed not only by the verbal and visual content but also by the verbal and visual style as well as by the interplay of the various semiotic modes. Moreover, its focus on the institutional constraints and possibilities of a variety of communicative practices makes it possible not only to consider the context in a systematic way in order to reconstruct multimodal argumentative discourse but also to describe specific argumentative activity types which employ images and text. As a case in point, I analyse a series of front covers from The Economist in order to show how the interplay of image and text amounts to strategic manoeuvring.
Keywords: argumentative activity types, argumentative moves, dialectical transformations, front covers, multimodal argumentation, principles of communication, reconstruction, strategic manoeuvring
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What can Pragma-Dialectics contribute to the study of multimodal argumentation?
  • 3. How to accommodate multimodal argumentation within Pragma-Dialectics?
  • 4. Analysing strategic manoeuvring in multimodal argumentative discourses
  • 5. The front covers of The Economist: a multimodal argumentative genre
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.18tse
References (62)
References
Bateman, J. (2014). Text and image. A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.Google Scholar
(2007). Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 103–113.Google Scholar
Blair, A. J. (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill, & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41–62). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015). Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation, 29, 217–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, J. M. R. (2015). Visual argumentation in political advertising: A context-oriented perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4, 286–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dondis, D. (1974). A primer of visual literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dove, I. J. (2012). On images as evidence and arguments. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 223–238). Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Visual arguments and meta-arguments. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013 (pp. 1–15). Ontario: OSSA.Google Scholar
(2016). Visual scheming: Assessing visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 254–264.Google Scholar
Eckstein, J. (forthcoming). Radiolab’s sound strategic maneuvers. Argumentation, published online 23 November 2016, DOI logo.
Edwards, J. L., & Winkler, C. K. (1997). Representative form and the visual ideograph: The Iwo Jima image in editorial cartoons. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83, 289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahnestock, J. (2003). Verbal and visual parallelism. Written Communication, 20, 123–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T. (2013). The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 415–428). Leiden: LUP.Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T., Groarke, L., & Plug, H. J. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleming, D. (1996). Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 11–22.Google Scholar
Godden, D. (2017). On the norms of visual argument: A case for normative non-revisionism. Argumentation, 31, 395–431.
Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18, 116–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Toward a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 137–151). Amsterdam: Sic Sat/ Virginia: Vale Press, Newport News.Google Scholar
(2015). Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation, 29, 133–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with Pinocchio. In A. Tseronis, & C. Forceville (Eds.) Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres. (pp. 81–110) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groarke, L., Palczewski, C. H., & Godden, D. (2016). Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 217–235.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Held, G. (2005). Magazine covers–a multimodal pretext-genre. Folia Linguistica, 39, 173–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language. Global communication for the 21st century. Macro VU Incorporated.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O′Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (2003). Why visual arguments aren’t arguments. In A. J. Blair, D. Farr, H. Hansen, R. Johnson, & C. Tindale (Eds.), Informal logic @25: Proceedings of the Windsor conference (pp. 1–13). Ontario: OSSA.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2012). Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 239–256). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a). The rhetoric of thick representation: How pictures render the importance and strength of an argument salient. Argumentation, 29, 197–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Symbolic condensation and thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 265–280.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lake, R. A., & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to multimodal analysis. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Novitz, D. (1977). Pictures and their use in communication. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plug, H. J. (2013). Manoeuvring strategically in political cartoons: Transforming visualizations of metaphors. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 429–440). Leiden: LUP.Google Scholar
Shelley, C. (2001). Aspects of visual argument: A study of the March of Progress. Informal Logic, 21, 85–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseronis, A. (2013). Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013 (pp. 1–17). Ontario: OSSA.Google Scholar
(2015a). Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 18–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Documentary film as multimodal argumentation: Arguing audio-visually about the 2008 financial crisis. In J. Wildfeuer (Ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research: International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis (pp. 327–345). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(forthcoming a). Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verval-visual divide. Semiotica, special issue.
(forthcoming b). Insights from Relevance Theory for determin the commitments of image-makers in arguments with multimodal allusions in the front covers of The Economist . International Review of Pragmatics, special issue.
Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (2017a). Arguing against corporate claims visually and multimodally: The genre of suverisements. Multimodal Communication. Published online 13 September 2017 . . DOI logo.Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2017b). Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Broek, J., Koetsenruijter, W., de Jong, J., & Smit, L. (2012). Visual language. Perspectives for both makers and users. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
van den Hoven, P. (2015). Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation, 29, 157–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Hoven, P., & Yang, Y. (2013). The argumentative reconstruction of multimodal discourse, taking the ABC coverage of president Hu Jintao’s visit to the USA as an example. Argumentation, 27, 403–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (1987). Argumentation studies’ five estates. In J. W. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices: Proceedings of the 5th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 9–24). Annandale, Virginia: Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar
(2016). Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation, 30, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.) Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp.131–159). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In D. Hitchcock, & D. Farr (Eds.), The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University (pp. 75–84). Windsor: OSSA.Google Scholar
van Rees, A. M. (2001). Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 165–199). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Wenzel, J. (1990). Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp, & J. Schuertz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 9–16). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Stöckl, Hartmut
2024. Fresh perspectives on multimodal argument reconstruction. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis, Ramy Younis & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
2024. A proposal for the evaluation of multimodal argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:2 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Allani, Samira & Silvia Molina-Plaza
2023. Comparing the Portrayal of the Fall of the Berlin Wall in Two Spanish Newspapers: A Multimodal Analysis. In Language of the Revolution [Palgrave Studies in Languages at War, ], ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris & Assimakis Tseronis
2023. The front page as a canvas for multimodal argumentation: Brexit in the Greek press. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2020. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2019. Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion. Argumentation 33:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2021. Characterizing Argumentative Style: The Case of KLM and the Destructed Squirrels. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis
2018. Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis
2021. From visual rhetoric to multimodal argumentation: exploring the rhetorical and argumentative relevance of multimodal figures on the covers of The Economist. Visual Communication 20:3 ► pp. 374 ff. DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis & Charles Forceville
2017. Introduction. Argumentation and rhetoric in visual and multimodal communication. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Argumentative Style [Argumentation in Context, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Authoritarianism on the Front Page [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 99], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.