(1996) “Look, and I will show you something you will want to see:” Pictorial engagement in negative political campaign commercials. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 69–80.
Barnhurst, K. G., Vari, M., & Rodríguez, Í.
(2004) Mapping visual studies in communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 616–644.
Barthes, R.
(1977) Rhetoric of the image. In R. Barthes, Image – text – music (pp. 32–51). London: Fontana.
Bateman, J. A.
(2014) Text and image. A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.
Bateman, J. A., Tseng, C., Seizov, O., Jacobs, A., Lüdtke, A., Müller, M. G., & Herzog, O.
(2016) Towards next-generation visual archives: Image, film and discourse. Visual Studies, 31, 131–154.
Benson, T. W.
(1974) Joe: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of film. Journal of Popular Culture, 8, 610–618.
Bex, F., Lawrence, J., Snaith, M., & Reed, C.
(2013) Implementing the argument web. Communications of the ACM, 56, 66–73.
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L.
(1996) Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L.
(2007) Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 103–113.
Blair, A. J.
(2004) The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill, & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blair, A. J.
(2012) Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic as related to argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45, 148–164.
Blair, A. J.
(2015) Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation, 29, 217–233.
Bloomfield, E. F., & Sangalang, A.
(2014) Juxtaposition as visual argument: Health rhetoric in Super Size Me and Fat Head. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50, 141–157.
(Ed.) (2013) Conversation analytic studies of multimodal interaction. Special issue Journal of Pragmatics, 46.
Dove, I. J.
(2013) Visual arguments and meta-arguments. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA)22–26May 2013 (pp. 1–15). Ontario: OSSA.
this volume). Arguing with illustrations: A visual archaeological debate about the proper place of Australopithecus Africanus.
Durand, J.
(1970) Rhétorique et image publicitaire. Communications, 15, 70–95.
Feteris, E. T.
(2013) The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 415–428). Leiden: Leiden University Press.
(2001) The naturalistic enthymeme and visual argument: Photographic representation in the “skull controversy.” Argumentation and Advocacy, 37, 133–149.
Fleming, D.
(1996) Can pictures be arguments?Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 11–22.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.
Forceville, C.
(2005) Addressing an audience: Time, place, and genre in Peter van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. Humor, 18, 247–278.
Forceville, C.
(2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C.
(2014) Relevance Theory as model for analysing multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C., & Clark, B.
(2014) Can pictures have explicatures?Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14, 451–472.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Foss, S. K.
(2005) Theory of visual rhetoric. In K. L. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication. Theory, methods, and media (pp. 141–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Frow, J.
(2015) Genre (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Gaede, W.
(1981) Vom Wort zum Bild: Kreativ-methoden der Visualisierung. Munich: Wirtschaftsverlag Langen-Müller.
Gelang, M., & Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2011) Nonverbal communication as argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, June29–July2 2010 (pp. 567–576). Amsterdam: SicSat.
Gibbons, M. G.
(2007) Seeing the mind in the matter: Functional brain imaging as framed visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 175–188.
Gigante, M. E.
(2012) Accommodating scientific illiteracy: Award-winning visualizations on the covers of Science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42, 21–38.
Gilbert, M. A.
(1994) Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 24, 159–177.
Godden, D.
(2017) On the norms of visual argument: A case for normative non-revisionism. Argumentation, 31, 395–431. .
Groarke, L.
(1996) Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18, 116–131.
Groarke, L.
(2002) Are musical arguments possible? In F. H. van Eemeren, A. J. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 419–422). Amsterdam: SicSat.
Groarke, L.
(2015) Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter?Argumentation, 29, 133–155.
Groarke, L.
this volume). Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with Pinocchio.
Groarke, L., Palczewski, C. H., & Godden, D.
(2016) Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 217–235.
Groarke, L., & Tindale, C. W.
(2013) Good reasoning matters! (5th ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Gronbeck, B. E.
(1978) Celluloid rhetoric: On genres of documentary. In K. K. Campbell, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action (pp. 139–161). Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Gronbeck, B. E.
(1995) Unstated propositions: Relations among verbal, visual, and acoustic languages. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 539–542). Annandale, VA: SCA.
Gross, A. G., & Harmon, J. E.
(2014) Science from sight to insight: How scientists illustrate meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Groupe µ.
(1992) Traité du signe visuel. Pour une rhétorique de l’image. Paris: Seuil.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1978) Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2004) An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Hample, D.
(2005) Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hariman, R.
(2015) Between confusion and boredom in the study of visual argument. Argumentation, 29, 239–242.
Hill, C. A., & Helmers, M.
(Eds.) (2004) Defining visual rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Iversen, M. H.
this volume). Employing film form and style in the argumentative analysis of political advertising.
Jacquin, J.
this volume). Embodied argumentation in public debates. The role of gestures in the segmentation of argumentative moves.
Jewitt, C.
(2014a) An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.
Jewitt, C.
(Ed.) (2014b) The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
(2003) Why ‘visual arguments’ aren’t arguments. In A. J. Blair, D. Farr, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson, & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Informal logic @25: Proceedings of the Windsor conference (pp. 1–13). Ontario: OSSA.
Kenney, K., & Scott, L. M.
(2003) A review of the visual rhetoric literature. In L. M. Scott, & R. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (pp. 17–56). London: Routledge.
Kišiček, G.
(2015) The role of prosodic features in the analysis of multimodal argumentation. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, July1–4 2014 (pp. 730–740). Amsterdam: SicSat.
Kita, S.
(Ed.) (2003) Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2012) Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 239–256). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2015) The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2016a) Studying rhetorical audiences: A call for qualitative reception studies in argumentation and rhetoric. Informal Logic, 36, 136–158.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2016b) Symbolic condensation and thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 265–280.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
this volume). The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography.
Klug, N. -M., & Stöckl, H.
(Eds.) (2016) Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [Handbook of language in multimodal contexts]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kostelnick, C., & Roberts, D. D.
(1998) Designing visual language: Strategies for professional communicators. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kress, G.
(2010) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T.
(1996) Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Lake, R. A., & Pickering, B. A.
(1998) Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Machin, D.
(2007) Introduction to multimodal analysis. New York: Bloomsbury.
McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J.
(Eds.) (2008) Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. Armonk New York: ME Sharp.
Medhurst, M. J.
(1978) Image and ambiguity: A rhetorical approach to the Exorcist. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 44, 73–92.
Medhurst, M. J., & Benson, T. W.
(Eds.) (1984) Rhetorical dimensions in media. A critical casebook. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A.
(1981) Political cartoons as rhetorical form: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs, 48, 197–236.
Messaris, P.
(1997) Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. London: Sage.
Nöth, W.
(1995) Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
O’Keefe, D. J.
(1977) Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13, 121–128.
Olson, L. C.
(2007) Intellectual and conceptual resources for visual rhetoric: A re-examination of scholarship since 1950. The Review of Communication, 7, 1–20.
Olson, L. C., Finnegan, C. A., & Hope, D. S.
(Eds.) (2008) Visual rhetoric: A reader in communication and American culture. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Patterson, S. W.
(2010) “A picture held us captive:” The later Wittgenstein on visual argumentation. Cogency, 2, 105–134.
Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B.
(Eds.) (2012) Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Poggi, I.
this volume). The “seeds” of charisma: Multimodal rhetoric of Mussolini’s discourse.
Poggi, I., & Vincze, L.
(2009) Gesture, gaze and persuasive strategies in political discourse. In M. Kipp, J. Martin, P. Paggio, & D. Heylen (Eds.), Multimodal corpora. From models of natural interaction to systems and applications (pp. 73–92). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pollaroli, C.
(2016) T(r)opical patterns in advertising: The argumentative relevance of multimodal metaphor in print advertisements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano.
(Ed.) (2006) Rhetorics of display. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Ripley, L. M.
(2008) Argumentation theorists argue that an ad is an argument. Argumentation, 22, 507–519.
Roque, G.
(2012) Visual argumentation. A further reappraisal. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 273–288). Dordrecht: Springer.
Roque, G.
this volume). Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective.
Scott, L. M.
(1994) Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 252–273.
Shelley, C.
(2001) Aspects of visual argument: A study of the March of Progress. Informal Logic, 21, 85–96.
Slade, C.
(2003) Seeing reasons: Visual argumentation in advertisements. Argumentation, 17, 145–160.
(2013) Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA)22–26May 2013 (pp. 1–17). Ontario: OSSA.
Tseronis, A.
(2015) Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 18–27.
forthcoming). Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal-visual divide. Special issue, Semiotica.
Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C.
this volume). The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Frederick Wiseman’s documentaries.
Tseronis, A., & Pollaroli, C.
Eds. forthcoming Pragmatic insights for multimodal argumentation Special issue International Review of Pragmatics 10
Tversky, B.
(2005) Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Hoven, P.
(2012) Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad on the US national debt. Informal Logic, 32, 381–402.
Van den Hoven, P.
(2015) Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation, 29, 157–176.
Van den Hoven, P., & Schilperoord, J.
this volume). Perspective by incongruity. Visual argumentative meaning in editorial cartoons.
Van den Hoven, P., & Yang, Y.
(2013) The argumentative reconstruction of multimodal discourse. Taking the ABC coverage of president Hu Jintao’s visit to the USA as an example. Argumentation, 27, 403–424.
Van Eemeren, F. H.
(2011) In context. Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation, 25, 141–161.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S.
(1993) Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2007) Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.
Van Rees, A. M.
(2001) Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 165–199). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wenzel, J.
(1990) Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp, & J. Schuertz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 9–16). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Wildfeuer, J., & Pollaroli, C.
this volume). Seeing the untold. Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Allchin, Douglas & Gábor Á. Zemplén
2020. Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science. Science Education 104:5 ► pp. 907 ff.
Gonçalves-Segundo, Paulo Roberto, Fabrizio Macagno & Isabel Cristina Michelan de Azevedo
2021. Argumentação multimodal: desafios e tendências recentes. Uma introdução ao número especial. Revista da ABRALIN► pp. 722 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens & Aaron Hess
2021. Experiencing multimodal rhetoric and argumentation in political advertisements: a study of how people respond to the rhetoric of multimodal communication. Visual Communication 20:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Messner, Monika
2023. ‘Domani a quest’ora potresti essere qui’: multimodal practices for representing temporality in destination advertising. Visual Communication
Pio, Melissa
2021. Percepção dos consumidores portugueses sobre estereótipos de gênero nos argumentos publicitários verbais e não verbais. Revista da ABRALIN► pp. 834 ff.
ŞAHİN, Tolga, Selma KOÇ AKGÜL & Betül PAZARBAŞI
2023. Politik Reklam Aracı Olarak Youtube: Türkiye’de 2015 Genel Seçimlerinde Siyasi Parti Reklam Videolarının Çok Modlu Söylem Analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.