Chapter 8
Employing film form and style in the argumentative analysis of political advertising
In this chapter I propose incorporating concepts from film studies in order to better analyze multimodal argumentation in audio-visual texts. I do so by examining the argumentation of a particular advertisement appealing to fear. The core argument in the chapter is that argumentation studies can benefit from appropriating or importing methods and concepts from film studies in order to supplement the interpretation and analysis of argumentation in moving images. In the chapter, I introduce a selection of methods and concepts from film analysis before exemplifying how they can be employed through describing the film style of a political ad produced by a Swedish right wing populist party.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A rhetorical perspective on argument
- 3.On political advertising and fear appeals
- 4.On the theory of film analysis
- 5.Questions for the analysis
- 5.1What is the central organizing principle of the film?
- 5.2How has the filmmaker staged some event for filming? (mise-en-scène)
- 5.3How is the event filmed? (cinematography)
- 5.4How are the different shots put together and coordinated? (editing)
- 5.5How are sound effects and music used for narrative structure, narrative support or for cueing emotions or moods? (sound)
- 6.Case study: Style and argument in a fear ad
- 6.1
Mise-en-scène
- 6.2Cinematography and editing
- 6.3Sound
- 6.4Functions of film form and style
- 7.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
-
List of primary sources
References (48)
References
Alcolea-Banegas, J. (2009). Visual arguments in film. Argumentation, 23, 259–275.
Barbatsis, G. S. (1996). “Look, and I will show you something you will want to see:” Pictorial engagement in negative political campaign commercials. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 69–80.
Blair, J. A. (2012). Relevance, acceptability and sufficiency today. In J. A. Blair, Groundwork in the theory of argumentation (pp. 87–100). Dordrecht: Springer.
Blakesley, D. (2009). Defining film rhetoric: The case of Hitchcock’s Vertigo
. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 111–133). New York: Routledge.
Bloomfield, E. F., & Sangalang, A. (2014). Juxtaposition as visual argument: Health rhetoric in Super Size Me and Fat Head
. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50, 141–156.
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2004). Film art: An introduction (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388–405.
Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carroll, N. (1998). Interpreting the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
Hatfield, K. L., Hinck, A., & Birkholt, M. J. (2007). Seeing the visual in argumentation: A rhetorical analysis of UNICEF Belgium’s smurf public service announcement. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 144–151.
Holtz-Bacha, C., & Kaid, L. L. (2006). Political advertising in international comparison. In L. L. Kaid, & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political advertising (pp. 3–13). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
Kern, M. (1989). 30-second politics: Political advertising in the eighties. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015a). The rhetoric of thick representation: How pictures render the importance and strenght of an argument salient. Argumentation, 29, 197–215.
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015b). The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132.
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2016). Symbolic condensation and thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54, 265–281.
Kock, C. (2007). Norms of legitimate dissensus. Informal Logic, 27, 42–63.
Lake, R. A., & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93.
Larsen, P. (2005). Filmmusikk: Historie, analyse, teori [Film music: History, analysis, theory]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Manolescu, B. I. (2006). A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation. Argumentation, 20, 327–343.
McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. London: Taylor & Francis.
Micheli, R. (2010). Emotions as objects of argumentative constructions. Argumentation, 24, 1–17.
Nymo, J. (2015). 1,2 millioner så Skavlans intervju med Åkesson [1,2 million watched Skavlan’s interview with Åkesson]. NRK. Retrieved from [URL]
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, London: University of Notre Dame Press.
Richardson Jr, G. W. (2008). Pulp politics: How political advertising tells the stories of American politics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Rocci, A., Mazzali-Lurati, S., & Pollaroli, C. (2013). Is this the Italy we like? Multimodal argumentation in a Fiat Panda TV commercial. In B. Pennock-Speck, & M. del Saz Rubio (Eds.), The multimodal analysis of television commercials (pp. 157–187). Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València (PUV).
Strachan, J. C., & Kendall, K. E. (2004). Political candidates’ convention films: Finding the perfect image – An overview of political image making. In C. A. Hill, & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 135–154). New York: Routledge.
Tindale, C. W. (2004). Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Tseronis, A. (2015). Documentary film as multimodal argumentation: Arguing audio-visually about the 2008 financial crisis. In J. Wildfeuer (Ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research. International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis (pp. 325–343). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (this volume). The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Frederick Wiseman’s documentaries.
Tseronis, A., Forceville, C., & Grannetia, M. (2015). The argumentative role of visual metaphor and visual antithesis in ‘fly-on-the-wall’documentary. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 1–4 July 2014 (pp. 1380–1395). Amsterdam: SicSat.
Van den Hoven, P. (2012a). Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad on the US national debt. Informal Logic, 32, 381–402.
Van den Hoven, P. (2012b). The narrator and the interpreter in visual and verbal argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 257–271). Dordrecht: Springer.
Van den Hoven, P. (2015). Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation, 29, 157–176.
Van den Hoven, P., & Yang, Y. (2013). The argumentative reconstruction of multimodal discourse. Taking the ABC coverage of president Hu Jintao’s visit to the USA as an example Argumentation
, 27, 403–424.
Walton, D. (1996). Practical reasoning and the structure of fear appeal arguments. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 4, 301–313.
Walton, D. (2010). The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.
Wildfeuer, J., & Pollaroli, C. (this volume). Seeing the untold. Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers.
Walton, D. (2013). Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats. Dordrecht: Springer.
Willard, C. A. (1989). A theory of argumentation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Zarefsky, D. (2014). Rhetorical perspectives on argumentation. Selected essays by David Zarefsky. Dordrecht: Springer.
List of primary sources
Dangerous. Retrieved 11 April 2017 from [URL].
Peace Little Girl (Daisy). Retrieved 11 April 2017 from [URL].
Sverigedemokratneras valfilm 2010 [Sweden Democrats Election Film 2010]. Retrieved 11 April 2017 from [URL].
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Pan, Molly Xie & Dennis Tay
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.