Cover not available
Part of
Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres
Edited by Assimakis Tseronis and Charles Forceville
[Argumentation in Context 14] 2017
► pp. 217–238

Chapter 8
Employing film form and style in the argumentative analysis of political advertising

In this chapter I propose incorporating concepts from film studies in order to better analyze multimodal argumentation in audio-visual texts. I do so by examining the argumentation of a particular advertisement appealing to fear. The core argument in the chapter is that argumentation studies can benefit from appropriating or importing methods and concepts from film studies in order to supplement the interpretation and analysis of argumentation in moving images. In the chapter, I introduce a selection of methods and concepts from film analysis before exemplifying how they can be employed through describing the film style of a political ad produced by a Swedish right wing populist party.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A rhetorical perspective on argument
  • 3.On political advertising and fear appeals
  • 4.On the theory of film analysis
  • 5.Questions for the analysis
    • 5.1What is the central organizing principle of the film?
    • 5.2How has the filmmaker staged some event for filming? (mise-en-scène)
    • 5.3How is the event filmed? (cinematography)
    • 5.4How are the different shots put together and coordinated? (editing)
    • 5.5How are sound effects and music used for narrative structure, narrative support or for cueing emotions or moods? (sound)
  • 6.Case study: Style and argument in a fear ad
    • 6.1 Mise-en-scène
    • 6.2Cinematography and editing
    • 6.3Sound
    • 6.4Functions of film form and style
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • List of primary sources
Published online: 20 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.09hoe
References (48)
References
Alcolea-Banegas, J. (2009). Visual arguments in film. Argumentation, 23, 259–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbatsis, G. S. (1996). “Look, and I will show you something you will want to see:” Pictorial engagement in negative political campaign commercials. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 69–80.Google Scholar
Blair, J. A. (2012). Relevance, acceptability and sufficiency today. In J. A. Blair, Groundwork in the theory of argumentation (pp. 87–100). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakesley, D. (2009). Defining film rhetoric: The case of Hitchcock’s Vertigo . In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 111–133). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, E. F., & Sangalang, A. (2014). Juxtaposition as visual argument: Health rhetoric in Super Size Me and Fat Head . Argumentation and Advocacy, 50, 141–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2004). Film art: An introduction (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1998). Interpreting the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, J. M. R. (2015). Visual argumentation in political advertising: A context-oriented perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4, 286–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Hatfield, K. L., Hinck, A., & Birkholt, M. J. (2007). Seeing the visual in argumentation: A rhetorical analysis of UNICEF Belgium’s smurf public service announcement. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 144–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holtz-Bacha, C., & Kaid, L. L. (2006). Political advertising in international comparison. In L. L. Kaid, & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political advertising (pp. 3–13). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Kern, M. (1989). 30-second politics: Political advertising in the eighties. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015a). The rhetoric of thick representation: How pictures render the importance and strenght of an argument salient. Argumentation, 29, 197–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Symbolic condensation and thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54, 265–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kock, C. (2007). Norms of legitimate dissensus. Informal Logic, 27, 42–63.Google Scholar
Lake, R. A., & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, P. (2005). Filmmusikk: Historie, analyse, teori [Film music: History, analysis, theory]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Manolescu, B. I. (2006). A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation. Argumentation, 20, 327–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Micheli, R. (2010). Emotions as objects of argumentative constructions. Argumentation, 24, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nymo, J. (2015). 1,2 millioner så Skavlans intervju med Åkesson [1,2 million watched Skavlan’s interview with Åkesson]. NRK. Retrieved from [URL]
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Plantin, C. (2004). On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Emotion in dialogic interaction: Advances in the complex (pp. 265–276): John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson Jr, G. W. (2008). Pulp politics: How political advertising tells the stories of American politics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Rocci, A., Mazzali-Lurati, S., & Pollaroli, C. (2013). Is this the Italy we like? Multimodal argumentation in a Fiat Panda TV commercial. In B. Pennock-Speck, & M. del Saz Rubio (Eds.), The multimodal analysis of television commercials (pp. 157–187). Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València (PUV).Google Scholar
Strachan, J. C., & Kendall, K. E. (2004). Political candidates’ convention films: Finding the perfect image – An overview of political image making. In C. A. Hill, & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 135–154). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tindale, C. W. (2004). Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tseronis, A. (2015). Documentary film as multimodal argumentation: Arguing audio-visually about the 2008 financial crisis. In J. Wildfeuer (Ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research. International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis (pp. 325–343). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (this volume). The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Frederick Wiseman’s documentaries.
Tseronis, A., Forceville, C., & Grannetia, M. (2015). The argumentative role of visual metaphor and visual antithesis in ‘fly-on-the-wall’documentary. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 1–4 July 2014 (pp. 1380–1395). Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, P. (2012a). Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad on the US national debt. Informal Logic, 32, 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b). The narrator and the interpreter in visual and verbal argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 257–271). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation, 29, 157–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Hoven, P., & Yang, Y. (2013). The argumentative reconstruction of multimodal discourse. Taking the ABC coverage of president Hu Jintao’s visit to the USA as an example Argumentation , 27, 403–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. (1996). Practical reasoning and the structure of fear appeal arguments. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 4, 301–313.Google Scholar
(2010). The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, J., & Pollaroli, C. (this volume). Seeing the untold. Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers.
Walton, D. (2013). Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Willard, C. A. (1989). A theory of argumentation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D. (2014). Rhetorical perspectives on argumentation. Selected essays by David Zarefsky. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List of primary sources
Dangerous. Retrieved 11 April 2017 from [URL].
Peace Little Girl (Daisy). Retrieved 11 April 2017 from [URL].
Sverigedemokratneras valfilm 2010 [Sweden Democrats Election Film 2010]. Retrieved 11 April 2017 from [URL].
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pan, Molly Xie & Dennis Tay
2023. Individual differences in identifying creative metaphors from video Ads. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.