Cover not available
Part of
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 33–60

Chapter 3
Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Advocacy campaigns and the media
  • 3.Advocacy argumentation in television campaigns: Towards an analytic framework (1)
  • 4.Television advocacy campaigns as dispositives: Towards an analytic framework (2)
  • 5.Illustration
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.03mad
References (53)
References
Beciu, C. (2009). Comunicare și discurs mediatic: O lectură sociologică [Communication and media discourse: A sociological reading]. București: [email protected].Google Scholar
(2011). Sociologia comunicării şi a spaţiului public [The sociology of communication and of the public sphere]. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.Google Scholar
Beciu, C., Ciocea, M., Mădroane, I. D., & Cârlan, A. I. (2018). Introduction: Intra-EU labor migration and transnationalism in media discourses: A public problem approach. In C. Beciu, M. Ciocea, I. D. Mădroane, & A. I. Cârlan (Eds.), Debating migration as a public problem: National publics and transnational fields (pp. 1–37). New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beciu, C., Lazăr, M., & Mădroane, I. D. (2018). Mediating Public Issues in Romanian Broadcast Talk: Personalized Communication Strategies. Television & New Media, 19(1), 75–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bătrânii României nu mai așteaptă nimic. Primarii cunosc legea care ar putea ajuta peste 640.000 de vârstnici, dar îi ignoră [Romania’s elders no longer hope for anything. The mayors are well aware of the law that could help over 640,000 elderly, but ignore it]. 2014 (March 31). Știrile ProTV [ProTV News]. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from [URL]
Birks, J. (2011). The politics of protest in newspaper campaigns: Dissent, populism and the rhetoric of authenticity. British Politics, 6(2), 128–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, J. A. (2012). Groundwork in the theory of argumentation: Selected papers of J. Anthony Blair (Argumentation Library 21). C. W. Tindale (Ed). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charaudeau, P. (2011). Les médias et l’information. L’impossible transparence du discours (2nd ed.). Bruxelles: De Boeck INA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Le discours politique. Les masques du pouvoir. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Coffman, J. (2002, May). Public communication campaign evaluation: An environmental scan of challenges, criticisms, practice, and opportunities (Prepared for the Communications Consortium Media Center). Harvard Family Research Project. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, M.A. Retrived February 20, 2019, from [URL]
Cox, R., & Pezzullo, P. C. (2016). Environmental communication and the public sphere (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Despre “România, Te Iubesc!” [About “Romania, I Love You!”]. n.d. România, te iubesc! [Romania, I love you!]. ProTV News. Retrieved March 02, 2019, from [URL]Google Scholar
Echipa [The Team]. n.d. România, te iubesc! [Romania, I love you!]. ProTV News. Retrieved March 02, 2019, [URL]Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1985). La guerre du faux. Paris: Editions Bernard Grasset.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvring in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation (Argumentation in Context). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Strategic maneuvering: Examining argumentation in context. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (Argumentation in Context, pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Există viață după cutremur – lecția japoneză [There is life after earthquake – The Japanese lesson]. (2017). Știrile ProTV/România, te iubesc [ProTV News/Romania, I love you]. București: ProTV.Google Scholar
Fairclough, I. (2016). Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK Austerity Budget. Critical Discourse Studies 13(1): 57–77. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2018). Deliberative discourse. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 242–256). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, I., & Mădroane, I. D. (2014). An argumentative approach to policy ‘framing’. Competing ‘frames’ and policy conflict in the Roşia Montană case. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodnight, T. G. (2009a). The duties of advocacy: Argumentation under conditions of disparity, asymmetry and difference. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues (Argumentation Library, Volume 14, pp. 269–286). Amsterdam: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b). Strategic maneuvering in direct-to-consumer drug advertising: Argument, contestation, and institutions. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (Argumentation in Context, pp. 77–92). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, J. (2013). Norms of advocacy. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewínsky (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–23 May 2012 (pp. 1–18). Windsor: ON, OSSA.Google Scholar
Henkemans, A. F. S. (2016). Argumentative patterns in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. Argumentation, 30(1), 81–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hrușcă, Șt. (1995). Rugă pentru părinți [Prayer for parents]. Rugă pentru părinți Album. Metropol Music.Google Scholar
Lazăr, M. (2008). Noua televiziune şi jurnalismul de spectacol [The new television and sensational journalism]. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.Google Scholar
Lewiński, M. (2017). Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy. Informal Logic, 37(2), 85–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lochard, G., & Boyer, H. (1998). Comunicarea mediatică [Media communication]. B. Geangalău (Trans.). Iași: Institutul European.Google Scholar
Mădroane, I. D. (2015). Campaign journalism on Romanian televisions: Towards a normative view of advocacy in the media. Revista română de sociologie, XXVI(5–6), 415–430.Google Scholar
(2016). Metaphors and calls for action in media advocacy campaigns on social issues. In L. Pungă. (Ed.), Language in use: Metaphors in non-literary contexts (pp. 169–191). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2018). Migrant identities and practices in media advocacy campaigns: The construction of claims and audiences. In C. Beciu, M. Ciocea, I.D. Mădroane, & A. I. Cârlan (Eds.), Debating migration as a public problem: National publics and transnational fields (pp. 175–198). New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moș Ion spune cu lacrimi în ochi povestea singură și tristă a sute de mii de bătrâni [With tears in his eyes, uncle Ion tells the lonely and sorrowful story of hundreds of thousands of old people]. (2014, 18 February). Știrile ProTV [ProTV News]. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from [URL]
Nel, N. (1990). Le débat télévisé. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, D. J. (2009). Normatively responsible advocacy: Some provocations from persuasion effects research. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues (Argumentation Library, Volume 14, pp. 79–90). Amsterdam: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pe banii trimiși de români în țară, statul își bate joc de părinții și bunicii lor. Cum sunt îngrijiți vârstnicii în Italia [Romanian migrants send money back home, but the state mocks their parents and grandparents. How the elderly are looked after in Italy]. (2014, February 23). România, te iubesc [Romania, I love you], Part 1. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from [URL]Google Scholar
Raduly, R. (2019, Sept. 25). Life Stories People Stories Point of View: Paula Herlo: Când am făcut Campania cu bătrânii, ‘Tu ce mai fac’ ând am făcut campania cu bătrânii, ‘Tu știi ce mai fac părinții tăi?’ m-am gândit că o să ajung și eu la anii bătrâneții și o să trăiesc într-o Românie în care scapă cine poate. Și parcă nu mi-aș dori asta [Paula Herlo: When I ran the campaign about the elders, ‘Any idea what your parents are doing right now?’ I thought I would be old one day and I would live in a country where every man is for himself. And I don’t think I want this]. Life.ro. Retrieved March 02, 2019, from [URL]Google Scholar
România, te iubesc [Romania, I love you]. (2008-ongoing). ProTV News. Production team: Paul Angelescu, Alex Dima, Paula Herlo, Cristian Leonte, Rareș Năstase, Cosmin Savu. București: ProTV.Google Scholar
România, Te Iubesc! Căutăm primar, model European [Romania, I Love You! We are looking for a mayor, European model]. (2016). Știrile ProTV/România, te iubesc [ProTV News/Romania, I love you]. București: ProTV.Google Scholar
România, țara catedralelor poleite cu aur ce n-a construit nici măcar 10.000 de locuri în căminele pentru bătrâni. Risipa ce le face viața un iad [Romania, the country of gilded cathedrals, does not even have 10.000 places available in state homes for the elderly. The waste that makes their lives a living hell]. (2014, February 23, Part 3). România, te iubesc [Romania, I love you]. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from [URL]Google Scholar
Semnează petiția [Sign the petition]. (2014). “Tu știi ce mai fac părinții tăi?” Știrile ProTV/ România, te iubesc [ProTV News/ Romania, I love you]. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from [URL] [no longer available].Google Scholar
Soulages, J. C. (1999). Les mises en scène visuelles de l’information: Étude comparée France, Espagne, États-Unis. Paris: Nathan & INA.Google Scholar
(2007). Les rhétoriques télévisuelles: Le formatage du regard. Bruxelles: De Boeck INA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statul își bate joc de generația ai cărei copii trimit în țară 3 miliarde de euro pe an [The state mocks the generation whose children send home 3 billion Euros every year]. (2014, February 18). Știrile ProTV [ProTV News]. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from [URL]Google Scholar
Știrile ProTV au dat startul campaniei “Tu știi ce mai fac părinții tăi?” [ProTV News has launched the campaign “Any idea what your parents are doing right now?”]. (2014, February 16). Știrile ProTV [ProTV News]. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from [URL]
Tu știi ce mai face copilul tău? [Any idea what your kid is doing right now?]. (2007). Știrile Pro TV [ProTV News]. București: ProTV.Google Scholar
Tu știi ce mai fac părinții tăi? [Any idea what your parents are doing right now?]. (2014). Știrile ProTV/România, te iubesc [ProTV News/Romania, I love you]. București: ProTV.Google Scholar
Wallack, Lawrence, & Dorfman, L. (2001). Putting Policy into Health Communication: The Role of Media Advocacy. In R. E. Rice, & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public Communication Campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 389–401). Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. (1999). One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias (SUNY Series in Logic and Language). New York: The University of New York Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Evaluating practical reasoning, Synthese, 157(2), 197–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zarefsky, D. (2009). Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (Argumentation in Context, pp. 115–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mădroane, Irina Diana & Alexandru I. Cârlan
2024. The enactment of rhetorical citizenship in a cultural journalism podcast: empowering low-skilled women migrants. Feminist Media Studies 24:6 ► pp. 1405 ff. DOI logo
Fairclough, Isabela & Irina Diana Mădroane
2020. An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict. Co-herencia 17:32 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.