Aakhus M., Muresan S., & Wacholder N. (2017). An argument-ontology for a response-centered approach to argumentation mining. In Bex, F., Grasso, F., Green, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2016), New York, USA, 9 July 2016. [URL].
Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, M. (1997). On the logical integrity of children’s arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 135–167.
Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentative design. In A. N. Perret-Clermont, & N. Muller Mirza (Eds.), Argumentation and Education: theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 145–174): Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626–639.
Baker, M., Andriessen, J., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Affective learning together. Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. New York: Routledge.
Banks-Leite, L. (1998). Langue et argumentation: considérations sur les échanges linguistiques à l’école maternelle. Psychologie de l’interaction, (7-8).
Bernicot, J., Trognon, A., Guidetti, M., & Musiol, M. (Eds.) (2002). Pragmatique et psychologie. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 1–67). New York: Wiley.
Carugati, F., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). Learning and instruction: Social-cognitive perspectives. In J. D. Wright (editor-in-chief) (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 13, pp. 670–676). Oxford: Elsevier.
Convertini, J. (2019). Contributo allo studio dei tipi di argomento in situazioni di problem solving tecnico da parte di bambini in età prescolare (Doctoral dissertation). Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.
Convertini, J., Gfeller, F., Iannaccone, A., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (2017). Construire sa place dans une activité collective entre enfants. Communication au Congrès de la Société Suisse pour la Recherche en Education (SSRE), 26-28 juin 2017.
Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2015). Latour goes to kindergarten: Children marshaling allies in a spontaneous argument about what counts as science. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 5, 5–19.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht / Cinnaminson: Foris.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1987). Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation, 1(3), 283–301.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2&3), 135–153.
Golder, C. (1996). La production de discours argumentatifs : revue de questions. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 116(1), 119–134.
Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et psychosociales. In N. Muller Mirza, & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 39–82). Bern: Peter Lang.
Greco, S., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Iannaccone, A., Rocci, A., Convertini, J., & Schär, R. (2018). Analyzing implicit premises within children’s argumentative inferences. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (pp. 147–167), Fribourg 2017. London: College Publications.
Greco, S., Schär, R., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Iannaccone, A. (2017). Argumentation as a dialogic interaction in everyday talk: Adults and children “playing by the rules” in board game play. Presented at the International Association for Dialogue Analysis IADA, Bologna.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Grize, J.-B. (1996). Logique naturelle et communications. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Hundeide, K. (1985). The tacit background of children’s judgments. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iannaccone, A., Perret-Clermont, A. N., & Convertini, J. (in preparation). Children as investigators of Brunerian “Possible worlds”. The role of narrative scenarios in children’s argumentative thinking.
Jackson, S. (2018). Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi (online first).
Kohler, A. (in preparation). Approches psychologiques de situations de malentendu dans des activités de didactique des sciences (Doctoral dissertation). University of Neuchâtel.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 73(3), 319–337.
Kuhn, D., & Park, S.-H. (2005). Epistemological understanding and the development of intellectual values. International Journal of educational research, 43(3), 111–124.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Lombardi, E., Greco, S., Massaro, D., Schär, R., Manzi, F., Iannaccone, A., Perret-C. A. N., & Marchetti, A. (2018). Does a good argument make a good answer? Argumentative reconstruction of children’s justifications in a second order false belief task. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.
Miserez-Caperos, C. (2017). Etude de l’argumentation à visée cognitive dans des interactions entre adulte et enfants : un regard psychosocial sur le modèle pragma-dialectique. Thèse de doctorat. Institut de psychologie et éducation, Université de Neuchâtel. Retrieved from [URL].
Muller Mirza, N. (2010). Psychosocial dimensions in argumentative learning interactions: identity dynamics and transformation. In M. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together (pp. 233–250).
Muller Mirza, N., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Eds.). (2009). Argumentation and education. Theoretical foundations and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Tartas, V., & Iannaccone, A. (2009). Psychosocial Processes in Argumentation. In N. Muller Mirza, & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education (pp. 67–90). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Musi, E., & Aakhus, M. (2018). Discovering argumentative patterns in energy polylogues: A macroscope for argument mining. Argumentation (online first)
Nonnon, E. (1996). Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances nouvelles : le dialogue comme espace d’exploration. Langue Française, 112(1), 67–87.
Nonnon, E. (2015). Préface. L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation. In N. Muller Mirza, & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducationL’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 1–11). Bern: Peter Lang.
Perret-Clermont, A. N., Arcidiacono, F., Lamas-Breux, S., Greco, S., & Miserez-Caperos, C. (2015). Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children. In Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 135–149). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Piaget, J. (1926). La représentation du monde chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Transl. in English: Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. London, New York Harcourt, Brace and Co.).
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12. (republished: (2008). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 51, 40-47).
Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. Paris: PUF.
Piaget, J. (1980). Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). La psychologie de l'enfant. Paris: PUF. (English edition 1969/2000, The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1966). La psychologie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Transl. in English: Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Plantin, C. (1996). Le trilogue argumentatif. Présentation de modèle, analyse de cas. Langue Française, 112, 9–30.
Plantin, C. (2005). L’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Pramling, N., & Säljö, R. (2015). The clinical interview: The child as a partner in conversation vs. the child as an object of research. In S. Robson, & S. Flannery Quinn (Eds.), The routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding (pp. 87–95). Oxon: Routledge.
Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource. In N. Muller Mirza, & A. N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp. 1–61). New York, NY: Springer.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2010). Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24, 489–512.
Rigotti, E., & Greco, S. (2019). Inference in argumentation: A topical approach to argument schemes. New York, NY: Springer.
Rocci, A. (2005). Connective predicates in monologic and dialogic argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences (Special Issue: Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction), 97–118.
Rocci, A. (2006). Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3 (4), 409–442.
Rocci, A. (2008). Analysing and evaluating persuasive media discourse in context. In: M. Burger (Ed.), L’analyse linguistique des discours médiatiques. Entre sciences du langage et sciences de la communication (pp. 247–284). Québec: Nota Bene.
Rommetveit, R. (1976). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In L. H. Strickland, K. J. Gergen, & F. J. Aboud (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 215–221). New York: Plenum Press.
Schär, R. G. (2018a). On the negotiation of issues in discussions among small children and their parents. TRANEL Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 68, 17–25.
Schär, R. G. (2018b). An argumentative analysis of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions (PhD Dissertation). Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano.
Schär, R., Greco, S. (2018). The emergence of issues in everyday discussions between adults and children. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric, 2(1).
Schwarz, B. (2008). ESCALATE: The white book. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Schwarz, B., & Baker, M. (2017). Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. New York City, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Traverso, V. (1999). L’Analyse de la conversation. Paris: Editions Nathan.
Trognon, A., Batt, M., Sorsana, C., & Saint-Dizier, V. (2011). Argumentation and dialogue. In A. Trognon, M. Batt, J. Caelen, & D. Vernant (Eds.), Logical properties of dialogue (pp. 147–186). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy (PUN).
Veneziano, E. (Ed.) (1999). La conversation : instrument, objet et source de connaissance (Psychologie de l’interaction No. 7–8). Paris : L’Harmattan.
2024. La argumentación dialógica: Tres ejemplos en diferentes momentos de desarrollo. Revista iberoamericana de psicología 17:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Kohler, Alaric
2023. Approches psychologiques de situations de malentendu dans des activités de didactique des sciences. Bulletin de psychologie N° 582:4 ► pp. 316 ff.
Bauri, Swagatanjali
2022. Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning. Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly
2022. Socio-cognitive Conflict. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly
2022. Socio-cognitive Conflict. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1517 ff.
Convertini, Josephine
2021. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Investigate Preschool children’s Implicit Inferential Reasoning in Scientific Activities. Research in Science Education 51:1 ► pp. 171 ff.
2021. Regards croisés des approches cognitives et socioculturelles sur l’apprentissage collaboratif : quelles contributions dans le domaine de l’éducation ?. Raisons éducatives N° 25:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
2019. Children as Investigators of Brunerian “Possible Worlds”. The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children’s Argumentative Thinking. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 53:4 ► pp. 679 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.