Chapter published in:
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 321334
References

References

Beevor, A.
(2012) The second world war. New York: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1973) The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psycholinguistics. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H.
(2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation (Argumentation in Context 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (Argumentation in Context 11, pp. 7–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B.
(2009) Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules (Argumentation Library 16). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) The disguised ‘abusive ad hominem’ empirically investigated. Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
 (2015) De vermomde ad baculum drogreden empirisch onderzocht [The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37(1), 79–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1992) Argumentation, communication and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2015) Argumentatie. Inleiding in het analyseren en beoordelen van betogen [Argumentation. Introduction into the analysis and evaluation of argumentative texts]. 5th revised ed. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Garssen, B. J.
(2006) Beweringen met nare consequenties. Twee varianten van het argumentum ad consequentiam [Assertions with nasty consequences. Two variants of the argumentum ad consequentiam]. In B. J. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren [Reasonableness in person. Ten pragma-dialectical essays in honour of Frans van Eemeren] (pp. 107–115). Amsterdam: Rozenberg.Google Scholar
(2016) Face the consequences! Strategic maneuvering with the argumentum ad consequentiam. In F. Paglieri, L. Bonelli, & S. Felletti (Eds.), The psychology of argument. Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion (Studies in logic: Mathematical logic and foundations 59, pp. 245–253). London: College Publications.Google Scholar