Article published in:Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 185–204
Learning to differ
Transforming parliament through argument and debate in Poland post-1989
The essay describes how Polish members of parliament (MPs) reinvented the institution of parliament (conceived of in its essentially discursive character as parleyment) in the course of the political transition of 1989. The reinvention of “parliamentary democracy” and deliberation in the chamber involved four interrelated developments: rearticulation of the “people” and thereby providing new basis for parliamentary “representation” and for the rhetorical agency of MPs; redefinition and rearticulation of the relationship between parliament and other organs of state power, especially government; emergence of deliberation through the dialectic between identification and division; and refunctionalization of verbal and non-verbal behaviors to enable exercise of MPs’ rhetorical agency in the plural context. The essay suggests a perspective that sees argumentation and debate as both shaped by and constitutive of “institutions,” a perspective that complements the view of argument and debate in interpersonal terms.
Published online: 30 April 2014
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Candlin, C. N.
Gunn, J. A. W.
Hibbing, J. R., & Patterson, S. C.
Ihalainen, P., & Palonen, K.
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N.
McGee, M. C.
Olson, D. M., & Norton, P.
Ornatowski, C. M.
Patterson, S. C., & Copeland, G. W.
Simon, M. D.
Tindale, C. W.
van Eemeren, F. H., & R. Grootendorst
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, A.
Van Haaften, Ton