The role of mirror neurons in the ontogeny of speech

Cited by 9 other publications

Bakrim, Noury

2020. The Biolinguistic Instantiation: Form to Meaning in Brain/Syllable Interactions. In Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics,

Krysiak, Adrian

2020. Sign languages as natural languages. Biolinguistic data. Nowa Audiofonologia 1:1 ► pp. 19 ff.

Majorano, Marinella, Marilyn M. Vihman & Rory A. DePaolis

2014. The Relationship Between Infants’ Production Experience and Their Processing of Speech. Language Learning and Development 10:2 ► pp. 179 ff.

Massaro, Dominic W. & Trevor H. Chen

2008. The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15:2 ► pp. 453 ff.

Polka, Linda, Matthew Masapollo & Lucie Ménard

2022. Setting the Stage for Speech Production: Infants Prefer Listening to Speech Sounds With Infant Vocal Resonances. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:1 ► pp. 109 ff.

Sirois, Sylvain, Michael Spratling, Michael S. C. Thomas, Gert Westermann, Denis Mareschal & Mark H. Johnson

2008. Précis ofNeuroconstructivism: How the Brain Constructs Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31:3 ► pp. 321 ff.

Vihman, Marilyn M. & William Croft

2013. Phonological development: toward a “radical” templatic phonology. In The Emergence of Phonology, ► pp. 17 ff.

Zamuner, Tania S. & Andrea Thiessen

2018. A phonological, lexical, and phonetic analysis of the new words that young children imitate. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:4 ► pp. 609 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Development in Perception. In Phonological Development, ► pp. 49 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.