8. Can “radical” simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition?

Proust, Joëlle

doi:10.1075/aicr.45.16pro

Part of

Simulation and Knowledge of Action
Edited by Jérôme Dokic and Joëlle Proust
[Advances in Consciousness Research 45] 2002
► pp. 201–228

8. Can “radical” simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition?

Joëlle Proust

Published online: 5 November 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.45.16pro

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

van Tiel, Bob & Walter Schaeken

2017. Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning. Cognitive Science 41:S5 ► pp. 1119 ff.

KISSINE, MIKHAIL

2012. Pragmatics, Cognitive Flexibility and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Mind & Language 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Dokic, Jérôme

2005. Introspection, déploiement et simulation. Philosophiques 32:2 ► pp. 383 ff.

Ludwig, Pascal

2005. Une défense hétérodoxe de la conception inférentialiste de l'introspection. Dialogue 44:1 ► pp. 123 ff.

Proust, Joëlle

2005. Réponse à Édouard Machery. Pour une pensée évolutionniste des représentations : le cas de l'objectivité. Dialogue 44:1 ► pp. 161 ff.

Proust, Joëlle

2007. Le langage forme-t-il une condition nécessaire de la rationalité?. Dialogue 46:1 ► pp. 165 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.