8. Can “radical” simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition?

Proust, Joëlle

doi:10.1075/aicr.45.16pro

Part of

Simulation and Knowledge of Action
Edited by Jérôme Dokic and Joëlle Proust
[Advances in Consciousness Research 45] 2002
► pp. 201–228

8. Can “radical” simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition?

Joëlle Proust

Published online: 5 November 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.45.16pro

Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Order by:

Dokic, Jérôme

2005. Introspection, déploiement et simulation. Philosophiques 32:2 ► pp. 383 ff.

KISSINE, MIKHAIL

2012. Pragmatics, Cognitive Flexibility and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Mind & Language 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Ludwig, Pascal

2005. Une défense hétérodoxe de la conception inférentialiste de l'introspection. Dialogue 44:1 ► pp. 123 ff.

Proust, Joëlle

2005. Réponse à Édouard Machery. Pour une pensée évolutionniste des représentations : le cas de l'objectivité. Dialogue 44:1 ► pp. 161 ff.

Proust, Joëlle

2007. Le langage forme-t-il une condition nécessaire de la rationalité?. Dialogue 46:1 ► pp. 165 ff.

van Tiel, Bob & Walter Schaeken

2017. Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning. Cognitive Science 41:S5 ► pp. 1119 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.