Mindshaping and the intentional control of the mind
Tillmann Vierkant | School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh
Andreas Paraskevaides | School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh
Understanding and controlling our minds is one of the most fascinating features of human cognition. It has often been assumed that this ability requires a theoretical understanding of psychological states. This assumption has recently been put under pressure by so called mindshaping approaches. We agree that these approaches provide us with a new way of self-understanding and that they enable a very powerful form of self-regulation which we label narrative control. However, we insist that there still is a crucial role for a theoretical understanding of psychological states in human cognition. We argue that this is because a theoretical understanding is necessary for all intentional control of the mind. Keywords: mindreading; mindshaping; narrative control; manipulative control; folk psychology
2022. Understanding implicit bias: A case for regulative dispositionalism. Philosophical Psychology 35:8 ► pp. 1212 ff.
Fernández-Castro, Víctor & Fernando Martínez-Manrique
2021. Shaping your own mind: the self-mindshaping view on metacognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Vierkant, Tillmann & Rosa Hardt
2015. Explicit Reasons, Implicit Stereotypes and the Effortful Control of the Mind. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Vierkant, Tillmann
2014. Mental Muscles and the Extended Will. Topoi 33:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Vierkant, Tillmann
2015. Is Willpower Just Another Way of Tying Oneself to the Mast?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6:4 ► pp. 779 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.