The structure of phenomenal consciousness
Philosophers have largely abandoned the claim that the special sciences will ultimately reduce to microphysics in favour of the view that the special sciences trade in functional explanations. However, a careful examination of scientific practice reveals that the explanatory strategy of the special sciences is neither reductionist nor functionalist, but mechanistic. Mechanistic explanations appeal to active material entities organized so as to produce the target phenomena. We claim that phenomenal consciousness will also succumb to mechanistic explanation: it will turn out to be the activity of specific neural mechanisms in the brain. In this chapter we explore the implications of this perspective for the ontology of consciousness, arguing that it has a complex structural essence.
References (45)
Bechtel, W. (2006). Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2002). Connectionism and the mind: Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Brown, M.E., & Swallowe, G.E. (1981). The thermal decomposition of the silver (I) and mercury (II) salts of 5-nitrotetrazole and of mercury (II) fulminate. Thermochimica Acta, 49(2–3), 333–349.
Bunge, M. (1997). Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(4), 410–416.
Chalmers, D.J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Churchland, P.M. (1995). The engine of reason, the seat of the soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Craver, C.F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 53–74.
Craver, C.F. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy, 72(20), 741–765.
Faust, W.L. (1989). Explosive molecular ionic crystals. Science, 245(4913), 37–42.
Fodor, J.A. (1974). Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28(2), 97–115.
Fodor, J.A. (1989). Making mind matter more. Philosophical Topics, 17(1), 59–79.
Fries, P., Nikolić, D., & Singer, W. (2007). The gamma cycle. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(7), 309–116.
Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S342–S353.
Hempel, C.G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn.
Kurzer, F. (2000). Fulminic acid in the history of organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 851–857.
Lamme, V.A.F. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual awareness: A linking proposition. Brain and Mind, 1(3), 385–406.
Lamme, V.A.F. (2004). Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; A case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks, 17(5–6), 861–872.
Llinás, R., Ribary, U., Contreras, D., & Pedroarena, C. (1998). The neuronal basis for consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1841–1849.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C.F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.
McGinn, C. (1991). The problem of consciousness: Essays toward a resolution. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Miller, S.M. (2007). On the correlation/constitution distinction problem (and other hard problems) in the scientific study of consciousness. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19(3), 159–76.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.
Newman, J. (1995). Thalamic contributions to attention and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(2), 172–193.
O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (1998). The disunity of consciousness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76(3), 378–395.
O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (1999). A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 127–148.
O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (2000). Disunity defended: A reply to Bayne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 255–263.
Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 2, Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (pp.3–36). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
Priestley, J. (1775). The history and present status of electricity, with original experiments, Vol. 1 (3rd ed.). London, UK: C. Bathurst & T. Lowndes, et al.
Revonsuo, A. (2006). Inner presence: Consciousness as a biological phenomenon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Revonsuo, A. (2010). Consciousness: The science of subjectivity. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Robertson, T. (2008). Essential vs. accidental properties. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 edition). Retrieved from [URL]
Salmon, W.C. (1978). Why ask, “Why?”? An inquiry concerning scientific explanation. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 51(6), 683–705.
Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24(1), 49–65.
Singer, W. (2007). Binding by synchrony. Scholarpedia, 2(12), 1657.
Smart, J.J.C. (1959). Sensations and brain processes. Philosophical Review, 68(2), 141–156.
Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 42.
Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216–242.
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2008). The neural correlates of consciousness: An update. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 239–261.
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(4), 229–239.
Waldmann, R., Chamigny, G., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C., & Lazdunski, M. (1997). A proton-gated cation channel involved in acid-sensing. Nature, 386(6621), 173–177.
Woodward, J. (1989). The causal mechanical model of explanation. In P. Kitcher & W.C. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 13, Scientific explanation (pp.357–383). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
Zeki, S., & Bartels, A. (1999). Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(2), 225–259.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Kob, Lukas
2023.
Exploring the role of structuralist methodology in the neuroscience of consciousness: a defense and analysis.
Neuroscience of Consciousness 2023:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.