Part of
Visually Situated Language Comprehension
Edited by Pia Knoeferle, Pirita Pyykkönen-Klauck and Matthew W. Crocker
[Advances in Consciousness Research 93] 2016
► pp. 261290
References (57)
References
Altmann, G.T.M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I.A., Carroll, D.J., Samson, D., Humphreys, G.W., Qureshi, A., & Moffitt, G. (2010). Why are there limits on theory of mind use? evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1201-1217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.E., Hudson Kam, C.L., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2007). If you say it thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 914-930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D.J. (2008a). Analyzing ’visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 457-474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008b). Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109, 18-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). Perspective-taking and its impostors in language use: Four patterns of deception. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), The oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 98-110). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barr, D.J., Gann, T.M., & Pierce, R.S. (2011). Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137, 201-207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D.J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 901-938). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Begeer, S., Malle, B.F., Nieuwland, M.S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Using theory of mind to represent and take part in social interactions: Comparing individuals with highfunctioning autism and typically developing controls. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 104-122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S.E., & Clark, H.H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1482-1493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S.E., & Hanna, J.E. (2009). Partner-Specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274-291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009a). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171-190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009b). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 893-900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122-1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Hanna, J.E. (2011). Talking in another’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing. Dialogue and Discourse, 2, 11-33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Carlson, T.B. (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long &A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Marshall, C.R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.K. Joshe, B.L. Webber, & I.A. Sag (Eds.) Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 245-258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Converse, B.A., Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2008). In the mood to get over yourself: Mood affects theory-of-mind use. Emotion, 8, 725-730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 498-513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., Morewedge, C.K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760-768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frank, A.F., Salverda, A.P., Jaeger, T.F., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2009). Multinomial models with “state” dependencies. In CUNY 2009 Conference on Human Sentence Processing .
Gerrig, R., & Littman, M. (1990). Disambiguation by community membership. Memory & Cognition, 18, 331-338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Mueller, R.A.G., & Cox, R.W. (1988). Common ground in asking and understanding questions. Language and Speech, 31, 321-335.Google Scholar
Greene, S., Gerrig, R., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 511-511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1957). Meaning. The philosophical review, 66, 377-388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J.C. (2011). The effect of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. In E.A. Gibson & N.J. Perlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 239-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanna, J.E., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105-115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanna, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Trueswell, J.C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, D., Grodner, D., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2008). The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition, 108, 831-836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2014). Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 131-143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horton, W., & Slaten, D. (2011). Anticipating who will say what: The influence of speaker-specific memory associations on reference resolution. Memory & Cognition, 1-14.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B. (1997). Unconfounding common ground. Discourse Processes, 24, 253-270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Barr, D.J., Balin, J.A., & Brauner, J.S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D.J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25-41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D.J. (2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 436-455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015). Referential precedents in spoken language comprehension: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 1-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.P.H. (2001). Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 21-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551-556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzing, C., & Brennan, S.E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partnerspecific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 201-213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadig, A.S., & Sedivy, J.C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints on children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P., & Glucksberg, S. (2011). Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Google Scholar
Savitsky, K., Keysar, B., Epley, N., Carter, T., & Swanson, A. (2011). The closenesscommunication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 269-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1987). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics, 25, 201-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloman, S.S. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D.M., Sedivy, J., Buchanan, D.W., & Hennessy, R. (2011). Speaker reliability in preschoolers’ inferences about the meanings of novel words. Journal of Child Language, 39, 90-104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., Frank, A., Jaeger, T.F., Masharov, M., & Salverda, A.P. (2008). The art of the state: Mixed-effect regression modeling in the visual world. In CUNY 2008 Conference on Human Sentence Processing .
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., & Hanna, J.E. (2000). Modeling thematic and discourse context effects on ambiguity resolution within a multiple constraints framework: Implications for the architecture of the language processing system. In M.W. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 90-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Berkum, J.J., van den Brink, D., Tesink, C.M., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580-591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, S., Barr, D.J., Gann, T.M., & Keysar, B. (2013). How culture influences perspective taking: differences in correction, not integration. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 822.Google Scholar
Wu, S., & Keysar, B. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18, 600-606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Gambi, Chiara, Priya Jindal, Sophie Sharpe, Martin J. Pickering & Hugh Rabagliati
2021. The Relation Between Preschoolers’ Vocabulary Development and Their Ability to Predict and Recognize Words. Child Development 92:3  pp. 1048 ff. DOI logo
Richter, Maria, Mariella Paul, Barbara Höhle & Isabell Wartenburger
2020. Common Ground Information Affects Reference Resolution: Evidence From Behavioral Data, ERPs, and Eye-Tracking. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Kronmüller, Edmundo, Ira Noveck, Natalia Rivera, Francisco Jaume-Guazzini & Dale Barr
2017. The positive side of a negative reference: the delay between linguistic processing and common ground. Royal Society Open Science 4:2  pp. 160827 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.