Article published in:
Visually Situated Language Comprehension
Edited by Pia Knoeferle, Pirita Pyykkönen-Klauck and Matthew W. Crocker
[Advances in Consciousness Research 93] 2016
► pp. 261290
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Gambi, Chiara, Priya Jindal, Sophie Sharpe, Martin J. Pickering & Hugh Rabagliati
2020. The Relation Between Preschoolers’ Vocabulary Development and Their Ability to Predict and Recognize Words. Child Development Crossref logo
Kronmüller, Edmundo, Ira Noveck, Natalia Rivera, Francisco Jaume-Guazzini & Dale Barr
2017. The positive side of a negative reference: the delay between linguistic processing and common ground. Royal Society Open Science 4:2  pp. 160827 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Altmann, G.T.M., & Kamide, Y.
(1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I.A., Carroll, D.J., Samson, D., Humphreys, G.W., Qureshi, A., & Moffitt, G.
(2010) Why are there limits on theory of mind use? evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1201-1217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.E., Hudson Kam, C.L., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2007) If you say it thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 914-930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D.J.
(2008a) Analyzing ’visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 457-474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109, 18-40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Perspective-taking and its impostors in language use: Four patterns of deception. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), The oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 98-110). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barr, D.J., Gann, T.M., & Pierce, R.S.
(2011) Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137, 201-207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D.J., & Keysar, B.
(2002) Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 901-938). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Begeer, S., Malle, B.F., Nieuwland, M.S., & Keysar, B.
(2010) Using theory of mind to represent and take part in social interactions: Comparing individuals with highfunctioning autism and typically developing controls. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 104-122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S.E., & Clark, H.H.
(1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1482-1493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S.E., & Hanna, J.E.
(2009) Partner-Specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274-291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S.
(2009a) Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171-190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 893-900. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2008) Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122-1134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Hanna, J.E.
(2011) Talking in another’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing. Dialogue and Discourse, 2, 11-33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Carlson, T.B.
(1981) Context for comprehension. In J. Long &A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Marshall, C.R.
(1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.K. Joshe, B.L. Webber, & I.A. Sag (Eds.) Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S.
(1983) Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 245-258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Converse, B.A., Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N.
(2008) In the mood to get over yourself: Mood affects theory-of-mind use. Emotion, 8, 725-730. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2004) Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 498-513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., Morewedge, C.K., & Keysar, B.
(2004) Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760-768. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A.
(1983) The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frank, A.F., Salverda, A.P., Jaeger, T.F., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2009) Multinomial models with “state” dependencies. In CUNY 2009 Conference on Human Sentence Processing .
Gerrig, R., & Littman, M.
(1990) Disambiguation by community membership. Memory & Cognition, 18, 331-338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Mueller, R.A.G., & Cox, R.W.
(1988) Common ground in asking and understanding questions. Language and Speech, 31, 321-335.Google Scholar
Greene, S., Gerrig, R., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1994) Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 511-511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1957) Meaning. The philosophical review, 66, 377-388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J.C.
(2011) The effect of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. In E.A. Gibson & N.J. Perlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 239-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, J.E., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2004) Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105-115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Trueswell, J.C.
(2003) The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, D., Grodner, D., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2008) The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition, 108, 831-836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C.
(2014) Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 131-143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horton, W., & Slaten, D.
(2011) Anticipating who will say what: The influence of speaker-specific memory associations on reference resolution. Memory & Cognition, 1-14.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D.
(1996) A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137-194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B.
(1997) Unconfounding common ground. Discourse Processes, 24, 253-270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Barr, D.J., Balin, J.A., & Brauner, J.S.
(2000) Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D.J.
(2003) Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25-41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D.J.
(2007) Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 436-455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Referential precedents in spoken language comprehension: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 1-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.P.H.
(2001) Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 21-44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.
(1969) Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N.
(2010) Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551-556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S.
(1994) Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metzing, C., & Brennan, S.E.
(2003) When conceptual pacts are broken: Partnerspecific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 201-213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nadig, A.S., & Sedivy, J.C.
(2002) Evidence of perspective-taking constraints on children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P., & Glucksberg, S.
(2011) Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Google Scholar
Savitsky, K., Keysar, B., Epley, N., Carter, T., & Swanson, A.
(2011) The closenesscommunication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 269-273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.
(1987) Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics, 25, 201-218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sloman, S.S.
(1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D.M., Sedivy, J., Buchanan, D.W., & Hennessy, R.
(2011) Speaker reliability in preschoolers’ inferences about the meanings of novel words. Journal of Child Language, 39, 90-104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., Frank, A., Jaeger, T.F., Masharov, M., & Salverda, A.P.
(2008) The art of the state: Mixed-effect regression modeling in the visual world. In CUNY 2008 Conference on Human Sentence Processing .
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C.
(1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., & Hanna, J.E.
(2000) Modeling thematic and discourse context effects on ambiguity resolution within a multiple constraints framework: Implications for the architecture of the language processing system. In M.W. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 90-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Berkum, J.J., van den Brink, D., Tesink, C.M., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P.
(2008) The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580-591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S., Barr, D.J., Gann, T.M., & Keysar, B.
(2013) How culture influences perspective taking: differences in correction, not integration. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 822.Google Scholar
Wu, S., & Keysar, B.
(2007) The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18, 600-606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar