Cover not available
Article published In:
AILA Review
Vol. 36:2 (2023) ► pp.299–320

Permanent or temporary homes?

Investigating the discourses of lifestyle migration, lifestyle mobilities and multilingualism within a Norwegian context

| University of Bern
| Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Questions surrounding mobility and migration are often connected to matters of language, citizenship, socio-economic status and class that are inherently unequal between developed and less-developed nation states. Scholars of geography and demographics have conceptualized both internal and external/international migration with “push” and “pull” factors as salient reasons for mobility. Traditional causes of external migration and so-called “push factors” include conflict, natural disaster, economic collapse, war, and transformations of socio-political systems as well as more promising employment options and decent incomes as contributing factors to external migration (Gonçalves & Schluter, 2020, p. 3). Such “forced moves” affect largely disadvantaged populations that are at risk (i.e. asylum seekers, refugees, victims of human trafficking) (Castles, 2003). For individuals engaging in lifestyle migration and lifestyle mobilities and considered voluntary migration, their life circumstances are extremely different in that they are often equipped with “privileged preconditions” (Mancinelli, 2020, p. 419) as “nomads from affluence” (Cohen, 1973) including for the most part, education, specialized skills, high standards of living and favorable visa regimes of their home countries (primarily in the West). These factors facilitate a range of choices in terms of where they travel to (i.e. place), also known as network capital, the kind of work they engage in and the rate of their mobility. Based on years of ethnographic work, in this paper, we investigate the different dimensions and discourses of lifestyle migration and lifestyle mobilities, both of which we argue presents a new trajectory and venue to explore within the field of migration linguistics (Borlongan, 2023). By focusing on two different case studies within Norway, we also draw on the notion of mediational repertoires (Lexander & Androutsopolous, 2021) as part of the communicative ecology in which jobs are found and where communication takes place among different types of migrants and their new permanent or temporary homes.
Keywords: multilingualism, lifestyle migration, lifestyle mobilities, Norway, mediational repertoires, yoga teachers, cleaners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Migration and multilingualism in Norway: Setting the scene
  • 3.Lifestyle migration and lifestyle mobilities
  • 4.Linguistic and mediational repertoires
  • 5.Methodology
  • 6.The discourses of lifestyle mobilities via yoga teaching as a global practice
  • 7.The discourses of lifestyle migration via cleaning work as multilingual practice
  • 8.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00057.gon
References (53)
References
Allan, K. (2013). Skilling the self: The communicability of immigrants as flexible labour. In A. Duchêne, M. Moyer, & C. Roberts (Eds.), Language, migration and social inequalities: A critical sociolinguistic perspective on institutions and work (pp. 56–78). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000). Living in the era of liquid modernity. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 22 (2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Benson, M. (2012). How culturally significant imaginings are translated into lifestyle migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (10), 1681–1696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benson, M., & O’Reilly, K. (2009). Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review, 57 (4), 608–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2013). Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In I. De Saint-Georges & J. J. Weber (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality (pp. 9–32). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borlongan, A. (2023). Migration linguistics: A synopsis. AILA Review, 36 (1), 38–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (transl. and ed. by R. Nice. Polity.Google Scholar
Bugge, E. (2021). Talemål, identitet og tilhørighet: Sosiolingvistiske perspektiv på språkanalyse ved søknad om beskyttelse og språkkrav for opphold og statsborgerskap. Målbryting, 12 1, 25–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busch, B. (2012). The linguistic repertoire revisited. Applied Linguistics, 33 (5), 503–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2021). Materialising semiotic repertoires: Challenges in the interactional analysis of multilingual communication. International journal of multilingualism, 18 (2), 206–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Transnational work, translingual practices, and interactional sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24 1, 555–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Translingual practices and neoliberal policies: Attitudes and strategies of African skilled migrants in anglophone workplaces. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37 (1), 13–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. (1973). Nomads from affluence: Notes on the phenomenon of drifter-tourism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 14 1, 89–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E., & Cohen, S. A. (2012). Current sociological theories and issues in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39 (4), 2177–2202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S., & Gössling, S. (2015). A darker side of hypermobility. Economy and Space, 47 (8), 1661–1679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dlaske, K., & Del Percio, A. (2022). Introduction: Language, work and affective capitalism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 276 1, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2012). Language and late capitalism: Pride and profit. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, T., Cohen, S. A., & Thulemark, M. (Eds.). (2013). Lifestyle mobilities: Intersections of travel, leisure and migration. Routledge.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edensor, T. (2007) Mundane mobilities, performances and spaces of tourism, Social & Cultural Geography, 8:2, 199–215, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Travel Connections: Tourism, Technology, and Togetherness in a mobile world. Annals of Tourism Research 401: 442–444.Google Scholar
Flores, N. (2013). The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly, 47 (3), 500–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrido, M. R., & Sabaté-Dalmau, M. (2020). Transnational trajectories of multilingual workers: Sociolinguistic approaches to emergent entrepreneurial selves. International Journal of Multilingualism, 17 (1), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, K. (2024). “From the side, you should look like a Japanese ham sandwich, no gap anywhere”: Exploring embodied, linguistic, and nonlinguistic signs in enregisterment processes of Bikram yoga in online and offline spaces. Signs and Society.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, K. (2020a). Labour policies, language use and the ’new’ economy. Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). Introduction. Managing people with language: language policy, planning and practice in multilingual blue-collar workplaces. Language Policy, 19 1, 327–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020c). “What the fuck is this for a language, this cannot be Deutsch?” Language, ideologies,policies, and semiotic practices of a kitchen crew in a hotel restaurant. Language Policy, 19 1, 417–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, K., & Schluter, A. (Eds.). (2020). Introduction: Language, inequality, and global care work. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 262 1, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist, 66 (6), 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, B. (2013). Yoga traveling: Bodily practice in transcultural perspective. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., & Pujolar, J. (2018). Critical sociolinguistic research methods: Studying language issues that matter. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Hiss, F., & Loppacher, A. (2021). “The working language is Norwegian. Not that this means anything, it seems”: When expectations meet the new multilingual reality. Acta Borealia, 38 (1), 43–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huete, R., Mantecon, A., & Estevez, J. (2013). Challenges in lifestyle migration research: Reflections and findings about the Spanish crisis. Mobilities, 8 (3), 331–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkeberg, M. I. (2020). Økt arbeidsinnvandring i fjor – SSB. Retrieved on 1 December 2023 from [URL]
Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37 (4), 474–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kusters, A. (2021). Introduction: The semiotic repertoire: Assemblages and evaluation of resources. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18 (2), 183–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lexander, K. V., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2021). Working with mediagrams: A methodology for collaborative research on mediational repertoires in multilingual families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42 (1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Multilingual families in a digital age. Mediational repertoires and transnational practices. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorente, B. (2018). Scripts of servitude: Language, labour migration and transnational domestic work. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mancinelli, F. (2020). Digital nomads: Freedom, responsibility and the neoliberal order. Information Technology & Tourism, 22 (3), 417–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education and Research. (2018). Integrering gjennom kunnskap. Regjeringens integreringsstrategi 2019–2022 (Integration through knowledge. The Norwegian Government’s Integration Strategy 2019–2022).Google Scholar
Rymes, B. (2014). Communicating beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Söderlundh, H., & Keevallik, L. (2022). Labour mobility across the Baltic sea: Language brokering at a blue-collar workplace in Sweden. Language in Society, 52 (5), 783–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statistics Norway. (2023). Innvandrere og norskfødte med innvandrerforeldre (ssb.no). Retrieved on 1 December 2023 from [URL]
Tagg, C., & Lyons, A. (2021). Repertoires on the move: Exploiting technological affordances and contexts in mobile messaging interactions. International Journal of multilingualism, 18 (2), 244–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thyness, H. & Lexander, K. V. (2023) Indexing the ‘included’ migrant? Social categorization and interpersonal digital interaction between labour migrants, teachers and employers in Norway. Language and Communication, 881, 27–40.Google Scholar
Urciuoli, B. (2008). Skills and selves in the new workplace. American Ethnologist, 35 (2), 211–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urry, J. (2002). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36 (2), 255–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar