Burhan-Horasanlı, Elif
2024.
Conference presentation preparation sessions as a site for academic discourse socialization in an engineering research team.
English for Specific Purposes 76
► pp. 41 ff.
Dong, Yang, Bonnie Wing‐Yin Chow, Jianhong Mo, Xuecong Miao & Hao‐Yuan Zheng
2024.
Effects of dialogic reading elements on children's language development.
Journal of Research in Reading 47:2
► pp. 181 ff.
Tran, Mai Ngoc & Kazuya Saito
2024.
Effects of the 4/3/2 activity revisited: Extending Boers (2014) and Thai & Boers (2016).
Language Teaching Research 28:2
► pp. 326 ff.
ACAROL, Kenan
2023.
The effect of web-based peer feedback on students’ writing achievement.
Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning
AlGhafri, Mahmood , Chahrazed Mirza & Cécile Gabarre
2023.
Students Attitudes Towards Oral Corrective Feedback: A Case Study from Oman.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Bao, Rui & Hui Wang
2023.
A comparison between the preferences for oral corrective feedback of teachers and students of Chinese as a second language.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
Donoso-Herrera, Lizeth
2023.
Vers le développement de la conscience métalinguistique des futurs enseignants de L2, LN et LNN.
Folios :57
► pp. 36 ff.
Jin, Xiaoling & Zhoulin Ruan
2023.
University Students’ Perceptions of Their Lecturer's Use of Evaluative Language in Oral Feedback.
Linguistics and Education 78
► pp. 101233 ff.
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
2023.
EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction.
Language Teaching Research 27:3
► pp. 689 ff.
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk & Jiahui Luo
2022.
Exploring teacher perceptions of different types of ‘feedback practices’ in higher education: implications for teacher feedback literacy.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:1
► pp. 61 ff.
HASEGAWA, ATSUSHI
2021.
Sociomateriality of Semiscripted Pair‐Work Prompts in Beginner‐Level Japanese‐as‐a‐Foreign‐Language Classrooms.
The Modern Language Journal 105:S1
► pp. 65 ff.
Kartchava, Eva & Hossein Nassaji
2021.
Corrective Feedback in Mobile Technology-Mediated Contexts. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching,
► pp. 520 ff.
Kartchava, Eva, Elizabeth Gatbonton, Ahlem Ammar & Pavel Trofimovich
2020.
Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices.
Language Teaching Research 24:2
► pp. 220 ff.
Nassaji, Hossein
2020.
Assessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges.
Language Teaching 53:1
► pp. 3 ff.
Nassaji, Hossein & Eva Kartchava
2020.
Corrective Feedback and Good Language Teachers. In
Lessons from Good Language Teachers,
► pp. 151 ff.
Penning de Vries, Bart WF, Catia Cucchiarini, Helmer Strik & Roeland van Hout
2020.
Spoken grammar practice in CALL: The effect of corrective feedback and education level in adult L2 learning.
Language Teaching Research 24:5
► pp. 714 ff.
REZALOU, Ali
2020.
STUDENT TEACHERS’ BELIEFS ABOUT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK.
Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi :41
► pp. 416 ff.
HERAZO, JOSÉ DAVID, KRISTIN J. DAVIN & ANAMARIA SAGRE
2019.
L2 Dynamic Assessment: An Activity Theory Perspective.
The Modern Language Journal 103:2
► pp. 443 ff.
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2019.
The combined effect of task repetition and post-task transcribing on L2 speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency.
The Language Learning Journal 47:2
► pp. 172 ff.
Li, Huifang (Lydia) & Noriko Iwashita
Li, Huifang (Lydia) & Noriko Iwashita
2021.
The role of recasts and negotiated prompts in an FL learning context in China with non-English major university students.
Language Teaching Research 25:2
► pp. 209 ff.
Netz, Hadar & Orna Fogel
2019.
Input-providing vs. output-pushing corrective feedback in dyadic tutoring sessions.
System 87
► pp. 102159 ff.
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019.
Pronunciation in the Classroom: Teachers and Teaching Methods. In
English Pronunciation Teaching and Research [
Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics, ],
► pp. 173 ff.
Wu, Xiao-hong, Sha Fang & Ivan Ka-Wai Lai
2019.
Undergraduate Student’s Acceptance of a Situational and Interactive Hotel English Learning APP: An Empirical Study Based on the Extension of UTAUT. In
Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations [
Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1048],
► pp. 203 ff.
Xu, Jinfen, Yumei Fan & Qingting Xu
2019.
EFL learners’ corrective feedback decision-making in task-based peer interaction.
Language Awareness 28:4
► pp. 329 ff.
ŞENDOĞAN, Kübra, Mukaddes ÇOBAN, Dilay İşık KİRİŞCİ, Simay ULUSCU & Mustafa POLAT
2019.
The Effect of Explicit Feedback in Oral Performance in Use of Past Tense.
SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 6:2
► pp. 35 ff.
杨, 松
2019.
The Comparative Study of College Students’ Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback in English Classes.
Modern Linguistics 07:02
► pp. 193 ff.
Chen, Chih-Ping
2018.
Understanding mobile English-learning gaming adopters in the self-learning market: The Uses and Gratification Expectancy Model.
Computers & Education 126
► pp. 217 ff.
Li, Huifang (Lydia)
2018.
Recasts and output-only prompts, individual learner factors and short-term EFL learning.
System 76
► pp. 103 ff.
Naeimi, Amin, Mahnaz Saeidi & Biook Behnam
2018.
Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention.
Education Research International 2018
► pp. 1 ff.
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2018.
Metacognitive Instruction Enhances the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback: Variable Effects of Feedback Types and Linguistic Targets.
Language Learning 68:2
► pp. 507 ff.
Tavakoli, Mansoor & Nourollah Zarrinabadi
2018.
Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate.
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12:3
► pp. 247 ff.
Martin, Sidney & Ibis M. Alvarez Valdivia
2017.
Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks.
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14:1
Nguyen, Minh Thi Thuy, H.T. Do, T.T. Pham & A.T. Nguyen
2017.
The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight month investigation.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Xu, Qi & Hongying Peng
2017.
Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language.
Computer Assisted Language Learning 30:3-4
► pp. 173 ff.
Xu, Qi & Hongying Peng
2022.
Exploring learner motivation and mobile‐assisted peer feedback in a business English speaking course.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38:4
► pp. 1033 ff.
Della Putta, Paolo
2016.
THE EFFECTS OF TEXTUAL ENHANCEMENT ON THE ACQUISITION OF TWO NONPARALLEL GRAMMATICAL FEATURES BY SPANISH-SPEAKING LEARNERS OF ITALIAN.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:2
► pp. 217 ff.
Fujii, Akiko, Nicole Ziegler & Alison Mackey
Gooch, Reginald, Kazuya Saito & Roy Lyster
2016.
Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners.
System 60
► pp. 117 ff.
Lee, Andrew H. & Roy Lyster
2016.
THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON INSTRUCTED L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:1
► pp. 35 ff.
Li, Shaofeng, Rod Ellis & Yan Zhu
2016.
Task-Based Versus Task-Supported Language Instruction: An Experimental Study.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36
► pp. 205 ff.
Skorczynska, Hanna, Milagros del Saz Rubio & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2016.
Second Language Teaching and Technology. An Overview. In
Technology Implementation in Second Language Teaching and Translation Studies [
New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 13 ff.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2015.
Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching.
Language Teaching 48:2
► pp. 263 ff.
Larsen‐Freeman, Diane
2018.
Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition.
Foreign Language Annals 51:1
► pp. 55 ff.
Lyster, Roy
2015.
The Relative Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in Classroom Interaction. In
The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction,
► pp. 213 ff.
Fernández-García, Marisol & Asunción Martínez-Arbelaiz
2014.
Native speaker–non-native speaker study abroad conversations: Do they provide feedback and opportunities for pushed output?.
System 42
► pp. 93 ff.
Moghaddam, Seyyed Reza Mousavi & Fatemeh Behjat
2014.
Overt-correction vs. Recasts and Grammar Performance of Iranian Male Learners of English.
Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:4
Xu, Hainu & Roy Lyster
2014.
Differential effects of explicit form-focused instruction on morphosyntactic development.
Language Awareness 23:1-2
► pp. 107 ff.
Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Muhammad Rahimi
2014.
EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes.
System 42
► pp. 429 ff.
Lyster, Roy, Kazuya Saito & Masatoshi Sato
2013.
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms.
Language Teaching 46:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Saito, Kazuya
2012.
Effects of Instruction on L2 Pronunciation Development: A Synthesis of 15 Quasi‐Experimental Intervention Studies.
TESOL Quarterly 46:4
► pp. 842 ff.
Saito, Kazuya
2013.
The Acquisitional Value of Recasts in Instructed Second Language Speech Learning: Teaching the Perception and Production of English /ɹ/ to Adult Japanese Learners.
Language Learning 63:3
► pp. 499 ff.
SAITO, KAZUYA
2015.
Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction.
Applied Psycholinguistics 36:2
► pp. 377 ff.
Saito, Kazuya & Roy Lyster
2012.
Effects of Form‐Focused Instruction and Corrective Feedback on L2 Pronunciation Development of /ɹ/ by Japanese Learners of English.
Language Learning 62:2
► pp. 595 ff.
Saito, Kazuya & Kim van Poeteren
2012.
Pronunciation-specific adjustment strategies for intelligibility in L2 teacher talk: results and implications of a questionnaire study.
Language Awareness 21:4
► pp. 369 ff.
Sato, Masatoshi & Roy Lyster
2012.
PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34:4
► pp. 591 ff.
김부자
2012.
Differential Effects of Oral Metalinguistic Feedback Given during English Writing Task Performance and Written Metalinguistic Feedback Given after English Writing Task Performance..
Studies in English Language & Literature 38:3
► pp. 165 ff.
ADAMS, REBECCA, ANA MARÍA NUEVO & TAKAKO EGI
2011.
Explicit and Implicit Feedback, Modified Output, and SLA: Does Explicit and Implicit Feedback Promote Learning and Learner–Learner Interactions?.
The Modern Language Journal 95:s1
► pp. 42 ff.
Ji-Young Jung
2010.
A Classroom Study on the Efficacy of Interactional Feedback for Korean Particles.
Journal of Korean Language Education 21:4
► pp. 255 ff.
Kiely, Richard & Matt Davis
2010.
From transmission to transformation: Teacher learning in English for speakers of other languages.
Language Teaching Research 14:3
► pp. 277 ff.
Lyster, Roy & Kazuya Saito
2010.
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2
► pp. 265 ff.
Yang, Yingli & Roy Lyster
2010.
EFFECTS OF FORM-FOCUSED PRACTICE AND FEEDBACK ON CHINESE EFL LEARNERS’ ACQUISITION OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR PAST TENSE FORMS.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2
► pp. 235 ff.
Balcom, Patricia & Siok H. Lee
2009.
The Effect of Extensive Instruction on Learning the Passive Voice in Intermediate ESL.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 157
► pp. 45 ff.
Bergen, David
2009.
The role of metacognition and cognitive conflict in the development of translation competence.
Across Languages and Cultures 10:2
► pp. 231 ff.
Philp, Jenefer & Rita Tognini
2009.
Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction.
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47:3-4
BELCHER, DIANE
2007.
A Bridge Too Far?.
TESOL Quarterly 41:2
► pp. 396 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.