Article published in:
Themes in SLA Research
Edited by Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig and Zoltán Dörnyei
[AILA Review 19] 2006
► pp. 1841
Cited by

Cited by 56 other publications

2011. Explicit and Implicit Feedback, Modified Output, and SLA: Does Explicit and Implicit Feedback Promote Learning and Learner-Learner Interactions?. The Modern Language Journal 95  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Balcom, Patricia & Siok H. Lee
2009. The Effect of Extensive Instruction on Learning the Passive Voice in Intermediate ESL. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 157  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
2007. A Bridge Too Far?. TESOL Quarterly 41:2  pp. 396 ff. Crossref logo
Bergen, David
2009. The role of metacognition and cognitive conflict in the development of translation competence. Across Languages and Cultures 10:2  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk & Jiahui Luo
2021. Exploring teacher perceptions of different types of ‘feedback practices’ in higher education: implications for teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Chih-Ping
2018. Understanding mobile English-learning gaming adopters in the self-learning market: The Uses and Gratification Expectancy Model. Computers & Education 126  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Fernández-García, Marisol & Asunción Martínez-Arbelaiz
2014. Native speaker–non-native speaker study abroad conversations: Do they provide feedback and opportunities for pushed output?. System 42  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
Fujii, Akiko, Nicole Ziegler & Alison Mackey
2016.  In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45],  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
Gooch, Reginald, Kazuya Saito & Roy Lyster
2016. Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners. System 60  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
2021. Sociomateriality of Semiscripted Pair‐Work Prompts in Beginner‐Level Japanese‐as‐a‐Foreign‐Language Classrooms. The Modern Language Journal 105:S1  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
2019. L2 Dynamic Assessment: An Activity Theory Perspective. The Modern Language Journal 103:2  pp. 443 ff. Crossref logo
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2019. The combined effect of task repetition and post-task transcribing on L2 speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The Language Learning Journal 47:2  pp. 172 ff. Crossref logo
Kartchava, Eva, Elizabeth Gatbonton, Ahlem Ammar & Pavel Trofimovich
2020. Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research 24:2  pp. 220 ff. Crossref logo
Kiely, Richard & Matt Davis
2010. From transmission to transformation: Teacher learning in English for speakers of other languages. Language Teaching Research 14:3  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2015. Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching 48:2  pp. 263 ff. Crossref logo
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2018. Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals 51:1  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Andrew H. & Roy Lyster
2016. THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON INSTRUCTED L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Huifang (Lydia)
2018. Recasts and output-only prompts, individual learner factors and short-term EFL learning. System 76  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Huifang (Lydia) & Noriko Iwashita
2019.  In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7],  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Huifang (Lydia) & Noriko Iwashita
2021. The role of recasts and negotiated prompts in an FL learning context in China with non-English major university students. Language Teaching Research 25:2  pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Shaofeng, Rod Ellis & Yan Zhu
2016. Task-Based Versus Task-Supported Language Instruction: An Experimental Study. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Lyster, Roy
2015.  In The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction,  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Lyster, Roy & Kazuya Saito
2010. ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Lyster, Roy, Kazuya Saito & Masatoshi Sato
2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Martin, Sidney & Ibis M. Alvarez Valdivia
2017. Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14:1 Crossref logo
Mifka-Profozic, Nadia
2014. Effectiveness of implicit negative feedback in a foreign language classroom. EUROSLA Yearbook 14  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Moghaddam, Seyyed Reza Mousavi & Fatemeh Behjat
2014. Overt-correction vs. Recasts and Grammar Performance of Iranian Male Learners of English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:4 Crossref logo
Naeimi, Amin, Mahnaz Saeidi & Biook Behnam
2018. Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention. Education Research International 2018  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Nassaji, Hossein
2020. Assessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges. Language Teaching 53:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Nassaji, Hossein & Eva Kartchava
2020.  In Lessons from Good Language Teachers,  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Netz, Hadar & Orna Fogel
2019. Input-providing vs. output-pushing corrective feedback in dyadic tutoring sessions. System 87  pp. 102159 ff. Crossref logo
Nguyen, Minh Thi Thuy, H.T. Do, T.T. Pham & A.T. Nguyen
2017. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight month investigation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Penning de Vries, Bart WF, Catia Cucchiarini, Helmer Strik & Roeland van Hout
2020. Spoken grammar practice in CALL: The effect of corrective feedback and education level in adult L2 learning. Language Teaching Research 24:5  pp. 714 ff. Crossref logo
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019.  In English Pronunciation Teaching and Research,  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Philp, Jenefer & Rita Tognini
2009. Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47:3-4 Crossref logo
2020. ADAY İNGİLİZCE ÖRETMENLERİNİN BAKIŞ AÇISINDAN DÜZELTİCİ GERİBİLDİRİM. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya
2012. Effects of Instruction on L2 Pronunciation Development: A Synthesis of 15 Quasi-Experimental Intervention Studies. TESOL Quarterly 46:4  pp. 842 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya
2013. The Acquisitional Value of Recasts in Instructed Second Language Speech Learning: Teaching the Perception and Production of English /ɹ/ to Adult Japanese Learners. Language Learning 63:3  pp. 499 ff. Crossref logo
2015. Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics 36:2  pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya & Roy Lyster
2012. Effects of Form-Focused Instruction and Corrective Feedback on L2 Pronunciation Development of /ɹ/ by Japanese Learners of English. Language Learning 62:2  pp. 595 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya & Kim van Poeteren
2012. Pronunciation-specific adjustment strategies for intelligibility in L2 teacher talk: results and implications of a questionnaire study. Language Awareness 21:4  pp. 369 ff. Crossref logo
Sarandi, Hedayat
2016. Oral Corrective Feedback: A Question of Classification and Application. TESOL Quarterly 50:1  pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2018. Metacognitive Instruction Enhances the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback: Variable Effects of Feedback Types and Linguistic Targets. Language Learning 68:2  pp. 507 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Roy Lyster
2012. PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34:4  pp. 591 ff. Crossref logo
Skorczynska, Hanna, Milagros del Saz Rubio & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2016.  In Technology Implementation in Second Language Teaching and Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Tavakoli, Mansoor & Nourollah Zarrinabadi
2018. Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12:3  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Tran, Mai Ngoc & Kazuya Saito
2021. Effects of the 4/3/2 activity revisited: Extending Boers (2014) and Thai & Boers (2016). Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882199413 ff. Crossref logo
Wu, Xiao-hong, Sha Fang & Ivan Ka-Wai Lai
2019.  In Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1048],  pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Hainu & Roy Lyster
2014. Differential effects of explicit form-focused instruction on morphosyntactic development. Language Awareness 23:1-2  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Jinfen, Yumei Fan & Qingting Xu
2019. EFL learners’ corrective feedback decision-making in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness 28:4  pp. 329 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Qi & Hongying Peng
2017. Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning 30:3-4  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Yingli & Roy Lyster
Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Muhammad Rahimi
2014. EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System 42  pp. 429 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Yanyin
2015.  In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4],  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
杨, 松
2019. The Comparative Study of College Students’ Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback in English Classes. Modern Linguistics 07:02  pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
2012. Differential Effects of Oral Metalinguistic Feedback Given during English Writing Task Performance and Written Metalinguistic Feedback Given after English Writing Task Performance.. Studies in English Language & Literature 38:3  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.