Article published In:
AILA Review: Online-First ArticlesChinese Russian language teachers’ agency in response to the New Liberal Arts policy
An ecological perspective
The Declaration on the Construction of New liberal Arts released in 2020 put forward curriculum-based ideological and moral education, quality culture, interdisciplinary integration and mode innovation as principles for new liberal arts construction, which are later adopted as language policy support underlying Chinese Russian language teachers’ (RLTs) career development. Against this backdrop, we focused on the issue of Russian language teachers’ agency in response to the call under the guidance of the ecological theory. We applied the ecological lens to researching how RLTs interact with diverse contextual factors at different subsystems to seek their professional development. The current study explored RLTs’ agency exercise experiences through semi-structured interviews with three RLTs working in Chinese universities. The findings showed that Chinese RLTs generally held a positive attitude towards the new education policy, while their potential for mobilizing was directly associated with the contingent policy of their local institutions. What’s more, their career prospects rested upon their career planning and personality. The study provides useful insights into teacher agency for less-commonly-taught languages and the different subsystems constraining their agencies. Given the relatively small sample size involved in the study and the strong dependence on interview-based data, further study based on larger sample size and multidimensional data with adequate cross-validation is expected.
Keywords: Chinese Russian language teachers, agency, ecological theory,
The Declaration on the Construction of New liberal Arts, policy
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Teacher agency and the ecological theory
- 2.1Teacher agency under policy changes
- 2.2The ecological theory of foreign language teachers
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Setting
- 3.2Participants
- 3.3Data collection and analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Macrosystem
- Teacher A
- Teacher B
- Teacher C
- 4.2Exosystem
- 4.3Mesosystem
- 4.3.1The impact of institutional polices
- 4.3.2The impact of interpersonal relationship
- 4.4Microsystem
- 4.1Macrosystem
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Enclosure statement
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 13 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23019.cai
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23019.cai
References (45)
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1993). The Ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak, & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments (pp.3–44). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen, X. M. (2000). Qualitative Research Methods and Social Science Research. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
(2003). Learning to do qualitative research in action. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
Chimbutane, F. (2011). Rethinking Bilingual Education in Postcolonial Contexts. In N. H. Hornberger, & C. Baker (Eds.), Multilingual Matters (pp.183–188). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto.
Chu, W. X., Liu, H. G., & Fang, F. (2021). A Tale of Three Excellent Chinese EFL Teachers: Unpacking Teacher Professional Qualities for Their Sustainable Career Trajectories from an Ecological Perspective. Sustainability. 131, 6721.
Chung, J., & Choi, T. H. (2016). English education policies in South Korea: Planned and enacted. In A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), English education policy in Asia (pp.281–299). Springer.
Cincotta-Segi, A. R. (2011). The big ones swallow the small ones. Or do they? Language-in-education policy and ethnic minority education in the Lao PDR. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development. 11, 1–15.
Duff, P. A. (2012). Identity, Agency, and Second Language Acquisition. In S. M. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.410–426). London: Routledge.
Ebersöhn, L., Loots, T., Eloff, I., & Ferreira, R. (2015). Taking note of obstacles research partners negotiate in long-term higher education community engagement partnerships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 451, 59–72.
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher-researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly. 31, 735–745.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity and agency in professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp.645–672).
Gao, X. S., Tao, J., & Gong, Y. (2018). Sociocultural Inquiry on Teacher Agency and Professional Identity in Curriculum Reforms. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching. 11, 19–28+146
Guo, Y. J. (2020). On the Construction of Foreign Language Education in the New Era: Thoughts and Reflections. Foreign Languages in China. 11, 4–12.
Freeman, R. D. (1998). Bilingual education and social change. Bilingual Education. Multilingual Matters.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education. 81, 967–983.
Hofstadler, N., Babic, S., Lämmerer, A., Mercer, S., & Oberdorfer, P. (2021). The ecology of CLIL teachers in Austria – an ecological perspective on CLIL teachers’ wellbeing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 31, 218–232.
Hu, G. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly. 41, 635–660.
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education. 211, 899–916.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2018). Constraints on Agency in Micro Language Policy and Planning in Schools. In J. Bouchard, & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in Language Policy and Planning – Critical Inquiries (pp.149–170). New York: Routledge.
Liu, H. G., Yan, C. M., & Fu, J. Y. (2022). Exploring livestream English teaching anxiety in the Chinese context: An ecological perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education. 41, 103620.
Maclellan, E. (2017). Shaping agency through theorising and practising teaching in teacher education. In Clandinin, D., & Husu, J. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in Teacher Education (pp.253–268). London: Sage.
Mansfield, C. F., Ebersöhn, L., Beltman, S., & Loots, T. (2018). Great Southern Lands: Making Space for Teacher Resilience in South Africa and Australia. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in Education: Concepts, Context and Connections. (pp.53–71). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Mercer, S. (2020). The wellbeing of language teachers in the private sector: An ecological perspective. Language Teaching Research, 1–24. Advanced online publication.
Ning, Q. (2020). Social Demand and Core Tasks in Construction of New Liberal Arts. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences). 41, 13–17.
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s professional agency – A relational approach to teacher learning. Learning, Research and Practice. 21, 112–129.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre, Curriculuma Inquiry, 21, 191–214.
Priestley, M., & Minty, S. (2013). Curriculum for excellence: ‘A brilliant idea, but….’. Scottish Educational Review. 11, 39–52.
Ramanathan, V. (2005). Rethinking language planning and policy from the ground up: Refashioning institutional realities and human lives. Current Issues in Language Planning. 21, 89–101.
Ruan, X., & Zheng, X. (2019). The rhetoric and the reality: Exploring the dynamics of professional agency in the identity commitment of a Chinese female teacher. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 211, 348–361.
Shohamy, E. (2010). Case of language policy resistance in Israel’s centralized educational system. In K. Menken, & O. Garcia (Eds.), Negotiating Language Policies in School (pp.182–197). New York: Routledge.
Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2003). Legal discourse and decisions, teacher policymaking and the multilingual classroom: Constraining and supporting Khmer/English biliteracy in the United States. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 61, 168–184.
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching & Teacher Education. 631, 346–355.
Tao, Y. (2021). Russian language teachers’ professional agency against the backdrop of the New National Teaching Quality Standards in China: an ecological perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 41, 347–370.
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., acker, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education. 611, 47–59.
Wang, C. J. (2021). What Does New Liberal Arts Mean to Foreign Language Education? Foreign Languages in China.
1
1, 1+24.
Wang, L. (2022). English Language Teacher Agency in Response to Curriculum Reform in China: An Ecological Approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 131, 935038.