References (56)
References
Aijmer, K. (2009). Corpus and Context. Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The effective use of YouTube videos for teaching English language in classrooms as supplementary material at Taibah University in Alula. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(3), 32–47.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. T. (2013). Contrasting Systemic Functional Linguistic and Situated Literacies Approaches to Multimodality in Literacy and Writing Studies. Written Communication, 30 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, J. A., Veloso, F. O. D., & Lau, Y. L. (2021). On the track of visual style: a diachronic study of page composition in comics and its functional motivation. Visual Communication, 20 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2018). Multimodality: A guide for linguists. Research Methods in Linguistics (2nd Edition). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, D., & van Over, B. (2013). Interpersonal pragmatics and cultural discourse. Journal of Pragmatics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., & Wang, W. (2016). Relating visual images to subtitle translation in Finding Nemo: A multi-semiotic interplay. Translation and Interpreting, 8 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. (2001). Linguistic anthropology a reader. In Blackwell anthologies in social and cultural anthropology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Ethnopragmatics and beyond: Intentionality and agency across languages and cultures. In Hybrids, differences, visionsGoogle Scholar
Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Cyberactivism in Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Al-Jezeera Youtube Channel: a Cyberpragmatic Study (Aktivisme Siber Dalam Komentar Berita Konflik Palestina Di Kanal Youtube Al-Jazeera: Kajian Siberpragmatik). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian PendidikanBahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7 (2), 267–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, A., Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1993). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. In Contemporary Sociology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guba, E. G., Guba, Y. A. L., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. Handbook of Qualitative Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, E. (2017). Introducing multimodality. Social Semiotics, 27 (5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic : the social interpretation of language and meaning. In American Anthropologist, New Series. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harwath, D., Torralba, A., & Glass, J. R. (2016). Unsupervised learning of spoken language with visual context. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (2013). Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 3–31). Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. (2001). Qualitative Methods in Sociolinguistics. In Journal of English Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kartika, D., Rahardi, R. K., Aziz, M., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Depicting reflections of power on illocutionary acts of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe ’ s speeches on Covid -19. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13 (2), 284–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & Mcguire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of CMC. American Psychhologist, 39 (10), 1123–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunjana Rahardi, R. (2023). Social–Societal Context Element Changes in Cyberpragmatics Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13 (11), 2771–2779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J. (2015). Mindfulness in cultural context. Transcultural Psychiatry. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (1990). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. In Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2019). Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality. Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, van T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics (1st ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahsun. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya (Edisi Revisi). Raja Grafindo Persada.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. Word, 62 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Wang, B., & Ma, Y. (2020). Matthiessen on Halliday. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum, 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation Can Improve Students ’ Scientific Writing Skills. International Journal of Language Education, 6 (4), 368–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peñarroja, M. R. (2020). Corpus Pragmatics and Multimodality: Compiling an ad-hoc Multimodal Corpus for EFL Pragmatics Teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 14 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinar Sanz, M. J. (2013). Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahardi, K. (2011). Interpretasi Konteks Pragmatik dalam Pemelajaran Bahasa. LITERASI: Indonesian Journal of Humanities, 1 (2).Google Scholar
(2016). Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions. Lingua Cultura, 10 (2), 95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Contexts as The Determining Roles of Javanese Phatic ‘Monggo’: Culture-Specific Pragmatics Perspective. Indonesian Language Education and Literature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Triadicities of Indonesian Phatic Functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12 (12), 2641–2650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahardi, R. K., Rahmat, W., & Kurniawan, Y. (2023). Pseudo-Directive Speech Act in the Javanese Language: Culture-Specific Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66 (11), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahmat, W., Lateh, N. H. M., & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). How Do the Women Control Their Language Facing Certain Condition? A Perspective of Psychopragmatics. International Journal of Language Education, 6 (1), 36–45.Google Scholar
Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Kemal, E., Tatalia, R. G., Azri, H., & Wulandari, Y. (2023). How Do the Young People Picture Out Their Use, Activeness, and Connectivity on Social Media? A Discourse Analysis Approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 01968599231174848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahmat, W., Fitriyah, R., Zulfa, Z., Riza, A., Afrinda, P. D., Fitri, R., & Pebriani, Y. (2023). Learning Foreign Language Towards Its Media and Identity To Motivate Student ’ s Personal Growth. Studies in Media and Communication, 11 (7), 197–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahmat, W., Putra, L. D., & Fitriyah, R. (2023). How do the Ethnicity Minangkabau Male Express Their Masculinity in Language : A Identity Point of View. Culture & Psychology, 0 (0), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Rahardi, R. K., & Saaduddin. (2024). How International Students can well understand adapted Online Collaboration Project for BIPA Learners. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8 (1), 143–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. In Working with Multimodality: Rethinking Literacy in a Digital Age. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozakis, M. (2007). The cultural context of emergencies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachs-Hombach, K., & Thon, J. N. (2019). Introduction: Multimodal media. Poetics Today, 40 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Argument Constellation in Journal Articles: Toulmin Stephen Perspective (Konstelasi Argumen Dalam Artikel Jurnal: Perspektif Stephen Toulmin). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6 (2), 207–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sultan, Rapi M., Basri, M. B., Mangila, B. B., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Texts and Tasks in Indonesian Language Textbooks: Do They Support Indonesian Students in the International Reading Literacy Test? International Journal of Language Education, 7 (3), 563–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taverniers, M. (2011). The syntax-semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thwaite, A. (2019). Halliday’s view of child language learning: Has it been misinterpreted? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trinh, N. T. T., Hoa, P. Van, & Phuc, T. H. (2017). Halliday’s Functional Grammar: Philosophical Foundation and Epistemology. Jurnal Humaniora, 29 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiawati, R. L., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., & Chen, W. (2022). The Importance of Guidance In Understanding Cultural Discourse In Thinking and Speaking For Foreign Students In BIPA Program. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2 (1), 39–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wincana, G., Rahmat, W., & Tatalia, R. G. (2022). Linguistic Tendencies of Anorexia Nervosa on Social Media Users. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2 (1), 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2006). Context, Community, and Authentic Language. TESOL Quarterly. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., & Hu, R. (2021). The appliability of systemic functional linguistics and its role in discipline integration. Journal of World Languages, 7 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. In Global Perspectives on Language Assessment. John Benjamins B.V. DOI logoGoogle Scholar