Article published In:
AILA Review: Online-First ArticlesUnraveling the psychological impact of spatial cybertext environments on speech intent
Insights from social media platforms
This cyberpragmatic study investigates the correlation between spatial multimodal cybertext environments and their
psychological impact on speech intent. The research delves into speech fragments in diverse cybertextual contexts across social
media platforms. The methodology involves data identification, transcription, classification, and typification. Similarly, looking
at things, the study shows that the physical settings of cybertexts have a big effect on the everyday meanings of words, acting as
background, determinant, emphasis enhancer, reinforcement, illustration, and signal for speech intent. The research explores the
distinct role of each category in shaping speech intention within spatial cybertexts, underscoring how these insights can
facilitate effective communication and their psychological impact on speech intent, particularly for language learners on social
media platforms.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research method
- 3.Research findings and discussion
- a.Multimodal spatial aspects of cybertext context as the background of speech pragmatic meanings
- b.Multimodal spatial aspects of cybertext context as a determinant of the pragmatic meaning of speech
- c.Multimodal spatial aspects of cybertext context as emphasizing the pragmatic meaning of speech
- d.Multimodal spatial aspects of cybertext context as reinforcement of speech pragmatic meaning
- e.Multimodal spatial aspects of cybertext context as an illustrator of the pragmatic meaning of speech
- f.Multimodal spatial aspects of cybertext context as signalers of speech pragmatic meanings
- Multimodal analysis of spatial aspects in influence on psychological cybertext context and to assist language learners in achieving communication goals
- 4.Conclusion
-
References
Published online: 13 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23022.rah
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23022.rah
References (56)
Aijmer, K. (2009). Corpus
and Context. Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. International Journal of
Corpus Linguistics.
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The effective use of YouTube
videos for teaching English language in classrooms as supplementary material at Taibah University in
Alula. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics
Research, 4(3), 32–47.
Anderson, K. T. (2013). Contrasting
Systemic Functional Linguistic and Situated Literacies Approaches to Multimodality in Literacy and Writing
Studies. Written
Communication,
30
(3).
Bateman, J. A., Veloso, F. O. D., & Lau, Y. L. (2021). On
the track of visual style: a diachronic study of page composition in comics and its functional
motivation. Visual
Communication,
20
(2).
Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2018). Multimodality:
A guide for linguists. Research Methods in Linguistics (2nd Edition).
Carbaugh, D., & van Over, B. (2013). Interpersonal
pragmatics and cultural discourse. Journal of Pragmatics.
Chen, Y., & Wang, W. (2016). Relating
visual images to subtitle translation in Finding Nemo: A multi-semiotic interplay. Translation
and Interpreting,
8
(1).
Duranti, A. (2001). Linguistic
anthropology a reader. In Blackwell anthologies in social and
cultural anthropology.
(2009). Ethnopragmatics
and beyond: Intentionality and agency across languages and
cultures. In Hybrids, differences, visions
Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Cyberactivism
in Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Al-Jezeera Youtube Channel: a Cyberpragmatic Study (Aktivisme Siber Dalam Komentar
Berita Konflik Palestina Di Kanal Youtube Al-Jazeera: Kajian Siberpragmatik). Jurnal Gramatika:
Jurnal Penelitian PendidikanBahasa Dan Sastra
Indonesia,
7
(2), 267–286.
Garcia, A., Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1993). Rethinking
Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. In Contemporary
Sociology.
Guba, E. G., Guba, Y. A. L., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing
Paradigms in Qualitative Research. Handbook of Qualitative Research.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language
as social semiotic : the social interpretation of language and
meaning. In American Anthropologist, New
Series.
Harwath, D., Torralba, A., & Glass, J. R. (2016). Unsupervised
learning of spoken language with visual context. Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems.
Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (2013). Introduction
to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In Pragmatics
of Computer-Mediated
Communication (pp. 3–31). Mouton.
Kartika, D., Rahardi, R. K., Aziz, M., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Depicting
reflections of power on illocutionary acts of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe ’ s speeches on Covid
-19. Indonesian Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
13
(2), 284–293.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & Mcguire, T. (1984). Social
psychological aspects of CMC. American
Psychhologist,
39
(10), 1123–1134.
Kunjana Rahardi, R. (2023). Social–Societal
Context Element Changes in Cyberpragmatics Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies,
13
(11), 2771–2779.
(2009). Multimodality:
A social semiotic approach to contemporary
communication. In Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to
Contemporary Communication.
(2015). Semiotic
work: Applied Linguistics and a social semiotic account of Multimodality. AILA
Review,
28
1.
Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2019). Doing
critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality. Critical
Discourse Studies,
16
(5).
Mahsun. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa:
Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya (Edisi Revisi). Raja Grafindo Persada.
Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning
matters: A short history of systemic functional
linguistics. Word,
62
(1).
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Wang, B., & Ma, Y. (2020). Matthiessen
on Halliday. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics
Forum,
2
(1).
Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How
Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation Can Improve Students ’ Scientific Writing
Skills. International Journal of Language
Education,
6
(4), 368–385.
Peñarroja, M. R. (2020). Corpus
Pragmatics and Multimodality: Compiling an ad-hoc Multimodal Corpus for EFL Pragmatics
Teaching. International Journal of
Instruction,
14
(1).
Pinar Sanz, M. J. (2013). Multimodality
and Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive
Linguistics,
11
(2).
Rahardi, K. (2011). Interpretasi
Konteks Pragmatik dalam Pemelajaran Bahasa. LITERASI: Indonesian Journal of
Humanities,
1
(2).
(2016). Personal
and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions. Lingua
Cultura,
10
(2), 95.
(2019). Contexts
as The Determining Roles of Javanese Phatic ‘Monggo’: Culture-Specific Pragmatics
Perspective. Indonesian Language Education and Literature.
Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Triadicities
of Indonesian Phatic Functions. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies,
12
(12), 2641–2650.
Rahardi, R. K., Rahmat, W., & Kurniawan, Y. (2023). Pseudo-Directive
Speech Act in the Javanese Language: Culture-Specific Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing
Research,
66
(11), 1–12.
Rahmat, W., Lateh, N. H. M., & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). How
Do the Women Control Their Language Facing Certain Condition? A Perspective of
Psychopragmatics. International Journal of Language
Education,
6
(1), 36–45.
Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Kemal, E., Tatalia, R. G., Azri, H., & Wulandari, Y. (2023). How
Do the Young People Picture Out Their Use, Activeness, and Connectivity on Social Media? A Discourse Analysis
Approach. Journal of Communication
Inquiry, 01968599231174848.
Rahmat, W., Fitriyah, R., Zulfa, Z., Riza, A., Afrinda, P. D., Fitri, R., & Pebriani, Y. (2023). Learning
Foreign Language Towards Its Media and Identity To Motivate Student ’ s Personal
Growth. Studies in Media and
Communication,
11
(7), 197–207.
Rahmat, W., Putra, L. D., & Fitriyah, R. (2023). How
do the Ethnicity Minangkabau Male Express Their Masculinity in Language : A Identity Point of
View. Culture &
Psychology,
0
(0), 1–15.
Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Rahardi, R. K., & Saaduddin. (2024). How
International Students can well understand adapted Online Collaboration Project for BIPA
Learners. Journal of Pedagogical
Research,
8
(1), 143–158.
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working
with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. In Working
with Multimodality: Rethinking Literacy in a Digital Age.
Rozakis, M. (2007). The
cultural context of emergencies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International
Journal.
Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Argument
Constellation in Journal Articles: Toulmin Stephen Perspective (Konstelasi Argumen Dalam Artikel Jurnal: Perspektif Stephen
Toulmin). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra
Indonesia,
6
(2), 207–223.
Sultan, Rapi M., Basri, M. B., Mangila, B. B., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Texts
and Tasks in Indonesian Language Textbooks: Do They Support Indonesian Students in the International Reading Literacy
Test? International Journal of Language
Education,
7
(3), 563–578.
Taverniers, M. (2011). The
syntax-semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of
stratification. Journal of
Pragmatics,
43
(4).
Thwaite, A. (2019). Halliday’s
view of child language learning: Has it been misinterpreted? Australian Journal of Teacher
Education,
44
(5).
Trinh, N. T. T., Hoa, P. Van, & Phuc, T. H. (2017). Halliday’s
Functional Grammar: Philosophical Foundation and Epistemology. Jurnal
Humaniora,
29
(2).
Tiawati, R. L., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., & Chen, W. (2022). The
Importance of Guidance In Understanding Cultural Discourse In Thinking and Speaking For Foreign Students In BIPA
Program. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse
Research,
2
(1), 39–47.
Wincana, G., Rahmat, W., & Tatalia, R. G. (2022). Linguistic
Tendencies of Anorexia Nervosa on Social Media Users. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse
Research,
2
(1), 1–9.