Article published In:
AILA Review: Online-First Articles

Processing and appreciation of literary metaphors in English as a foreign language

An eye-tracking study

ORCID logo | University of Warsaw
| University of Warsaw | University of Verona
| University of Warsaw | University of Vienna
Purpose: Experimental research on the processing of literary metaphors in a foreign language (L2) is scarce, as well as research on how non-native speakers perceive the aesthetic value of such metaphors. The paper aims to gain a deeper insight into the topic.
Method: The team experiment
was conducted in 2022 at the University of Warsaw. The methodology consisted of both online (eye tracking) and offline (comprehension tests, appreciation ratings) methods. The following research questions were formulated: (a) How do we process literary metaphors in L2? (b) Is their processing cognitively demanding? (c) How well do people understand literary metaphors in a foreign language? (d) How do we evaluate their aesthetic value? The participants were Polish EFL students (English level B2 and higher) who were given an excerpt from “The Picture of Dorian Gray” by Oscar Wilde. The experimental group read the original text with metaphors, and the control group read an adapted text where metaphors were rewritten in plain language.
Results: (1) Non-native readers process metaphors significantly slower than they do non-metaphorical expressions (a three-stage model of metaphor processing in L2). (2) All eye-tracking parameters were much higher for metaphors, indicating increased cognitive load. (3) Non-native readers rate the aesthetic value of metaphors in L2 higher than they do the corresponding non-metaphorical expressions. In addition, the more aesthetically appreciated the metaphor was for the respondents, the more time they spent on its reading.
Conclusion: The processing of literary metaphors in L2 is associated with increased cognitive load and enhanced aesthetic evaluation.
Keywords: literary metaphors, English as a foreign language, processing metaphors in a foreign language, appreciation of metaphors, comprehension of metaphors, eye tracking, experiment, foregrounding elements
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical accounts of metaphor comprehension
  • Metaphor processing in a second language
  • Eye-tracking experiments on metaphor processing. State of the art
  • Experimental design
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Experimental settings
    • Apparatus
    • Procedure
  • Data analysis
  • Analysis by items. Eye-tracking data
    • Dwell time
    • Fixation count
    • Fixation time
    • Revisits
  • Analysis by items. Comprehension test
  • Analysis by items. Appreciation test
  • Analysis by items. Correlations
  • Analysis by subjects. Eye-tracking data
    • Dwell time
    • Fixation count
    • Fixation time
    • Revisits
  • Analysis by subjects. Comprehension test
  • Analysis by subjects. Appreciation test
  • Analysis by subjects. Correlations
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Disclosure statement
  • Data availability statement
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 13 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23024.plu
References (56)
References
Akkök, E. A., & Uzun, I. P. B. (2018). Metaphor processing in Turkish: An eye-movement study. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 15(1), 105–124.Google Scholar
Binghan, Z., & Hao, Z. (2018). Revisiting processing time for metaphorical expressions: An eye-tracking study on eye-voice span during sight translation. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly), 50(5), 744–759.Google Scholar
Blank, G. D. (1988). Metaphors in the lexicon. Metaphor and Symbol, 3(3), 21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding figurative language. In: Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, 447–477.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2010). XIII – Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 110 (3), 295–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Peng, X., & Zhao, Y. (2013). An ERP study on metaphor comprehension in the bilingual brain. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36 (4), 505–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., & Lucy, P. (1975). Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 335–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Columbus, G., Sheikh, N. A., Côté-Lecaldare, M., Häuser, K., Baum, S. R., & Titone, D. (2015). Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: An eye movement study of sentence reading. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 81, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, M. (1993). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching. In: Alatis, J. E. (Eds.) Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. Georgetown University Press, 489–500.Google Scholar
(2003). Second language teaching: A view from the right side of the brain. Springer Science and Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Conceptual errors in second-language learning. In: De Knop, S. and De Rycker, T. (Eds.) Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Mouton De Gruyter, 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L. C. (2008). A psycholinguistic study on metaphor comprehension in a foreign language. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, 6(11), 1–23.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In: Miall, D. S. (Eds.) Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives. Harvester Press, 106–132.Google Scholar
George, T., & Wiley, J. (2016). Forgetting the literal: The role of inhibition in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42(8), 1324–1330.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1981). Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 201, 435–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and symbol, 16(3–4), 317–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science 81, 275–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). What does it mean to say that a metaphor has been understood? In: Haskell, R. (Eds.) Cognition and symbolic structures: The psychology of metaphoric transformations. Ablex, 31–48.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 21(1), 85–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldvarg, Y., & Glucksberg, S. (1998). Conceptual combinations: The role of similarity. Metaphor and Symbol 13(4), 243–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (Eds.) Syntax and semantics: Speech acts. Seminar Press, 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. J., Tebbe, M. R., Leka, G. E., Garcia, R. C., & Erramouspe, R. (1999). Monolingual and bilingual memory for English and Spanish metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 14 (1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoang, H. (2014). Metaphor and second language learning: The state of the field. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language 18(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H., & Joseph, B. D. (1996). Language history, language change and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, E., & Hatzidaki, A. (2019). Metaphor comprehension in L2: Meaning, images and emotions. Journal of Pragmatics 1491, 78–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikuta, M., & Miwa, K. (2021). Structure mapping in second-language metaphor processing. Metaphor and Symbol 36(4), 288–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D., & Carroll, P. J. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory & Cognition 12(6),558–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In: Schrott, R. and Jacobs, A. M. (Eds.) Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities). Carl Hanser Verlag, 492–520.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, K., Naranowicz, M., & Rataj, K. (2021). Metaphors are like lenses: Electrophysiological correlates of novel meaning processing in bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25 (3), 668–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janus, R. A., & Bever, T. G. (1985). Processing of metaphoric language: An investigation of the three-stage model of metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14(5), 473–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A.T. (1996). Comprehension of metaphors and similes: A reaction time study. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 111, 145–159.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2001). The ‘graded salience hypothesis’ in second language acquisition. In: Pütz, M., Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (Eds.) Applied cognitive linguistics: Volume 1. Mouton de Gruyter, 249–271. DOI logo
Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. R. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and symbol 17(4), 249–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2001). The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in higher education 6(3), 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied linguistics 32(4), 408–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied linguistics 27(2), 268–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Bertram, R., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2022). Knowledge is a river and education is like a stairway: An eye movement study on how L2 speakers process metaphors and similes. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25(2), 307–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. E. (1993). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 17(4), 465–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A., & Walsh, M. (1993). Psychological processes in metaphor comprehension and memory. In: Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Płużyczka, M. (2013). Eye-tracking research into sight translation processes. Lapsological conclusions. In: Grucza, S., Płużyczka, M., & Zając, J. (Eds.) Translation Studies and Eye-Tracking Analysis (= Warschauer Studien zur Germanistik und Angewandten Linguistik). Peter Lang Verlag, 105–138.Google Scholar
(2015). Tłumaczenie a vista: rozważania teoretyczne i badania eyetrackingowe (Eng.: Sight translation. Theoretical considerations and eye-tracking research). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Komunikacji Specjalistycznej i Interkulturowej. Uniwersytet Warszawski.Google Scholar
(2020). Tracking mental processes in sight translation. Neurobiological determinants of selected eye-tracking parameters. Translation, Cognition & Behaviour 3(2), 209–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1979). Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, 92–123.Google Scholar
(1993). Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought ( 2 ). Cambridge University Press, 83–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. (1992). Literary and nonliterary aspects of metaphor. Poetics Today 13(4), 687–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, X., Shen, L., Yang, P., Huang, Y., Huang, S., Huang, M., & Ren, W. (2022). Bilingual processing mechanisms of scientific metaphors and conventional metaphors: evidence via a contrastive event-related potentials study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 1, 894114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaid, J., López, B. G., & Martínez, F. E. (2015). Linking the figurative to the creative: Bilinguals’ comprehension of metaphors, jokes, and remote associates. In: Heredia, R. R. and Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.) Bilingual figurative language processing. Cambridge University Press, 53–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., & Jankowiak, K. (2023). Electrophysiological insights into the role of proficiency in bilingual novel and conventional metaphor processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13 (2), 163–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Way, E. C. (1991). Knowledge representation and metaphor (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive science 35(8), 1456–1488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar