Applied Folk Linguistics
AILA Review, Volume 24
Within applied linguistics, a number of approaches consider the ideas that lay people have about language-related topics. Taking those ideas as a serious object of research is essentially what can be subsumed under the folk linguistics approach. This issue of the AILA Review connects the study of folk beliefs about language(s), language learning and communication to the field of applied linguistics. It discusses current research and studies addressing applied folk linguistic topics and their relevance for the understanding of people’s language-related everyday problems on the one hand and the practical application of those insights to such everyday problems on the other. The issue considers theoretical foundations, empirical methods and practical solutions derived from folk linguistic investigation. The contributions cover a wide range of thematic fields for which the study of folk beliefs is essential, among them language learning and teaching, language policy, language variation, multilingualism and diachronic developments in language assessment.
[AILA Review, 24] 2011. iii, 115 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Bringing the ‘folk’ into applied linguistics: An introductionAntje Wilton & Martin Stegu | pp. 1–14
Methods in (applied) folk linguistics: Getting into the minds of the folkDennis R. Preston | pp. 15–39
Do non-linguists practice linguistics? An anti-eliminative approach to folk theoriesMarie-Anne Paveau | pp. 40–54
Linking past and present: A view of historical comments about languageAntje Wilton & Holger Wochele | pp. 55–67
Communication and understandingKarol Janicki | pp. 68–77
First language acquisition and teachingMadalena Cruz-Ferreira | pp. 78–87
Folk beliefs about second language learning and teachingMichael Pasquale | pp. 88–99
That which We Call a Rose by any Other Name Would Sound as Sweet: Folk perceptions, status and language variationRobert M. McKenzie & Dietmar Osthus | pp. 100–115
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.