Article published In:
AILA Review: Online-First Articles

Learning vocabulary through listening

The role of strategy use and linguistic proficiency

ORCID logo | University of Reading
ORCID logo | University of Reading
This study explored the strategy use of 12 high-school learners of English within a vocabulary teaching intervention which exposed three groups of learners to one of three types of oral vocabulary explanations: L2 explanations; codeswitched explanations (CS); and contrastive focus-on-form explanations (CFoF) giving cross-linguistic information. Unlike previous studies of vocabulary interventions, which have tended to focus solely on quantitative outcome measures and therefore give arguably limited insights into why different interventions have the impact that they do, the study implemented stimulated recall interviews to explore strategy use in order to better understand the learning outcomes from the intervention. A qualitative analysis was undertaken to explore how learners used strategies and whether patterns of use emerged by intervention group and proficiency level. Compared with the CS and L2 groups, learners from the CFoF group attended more specifically to the target words and engaged in more metacognitive reflection and evaluation of the explanations, leading potentially to deeper processing and hence greater vocabulary gains. Such strategy use also seemed, however, to explain their smaller gains in listening comprehension. Finally, strategic behaviour was found to be related to levels of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. The value of exploring qualitative data on strategy use for evaluating the effects of an intervention is discussed, alongside the theoretical and pedagogical implications of these findings.
Keywords: listening, vocabulary learning, strategy use, proficiency
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Vocabulary learning through listening and proficiency
  • The present study
  • Method
    • Participants and procedures
    • Stimulated recall interviews
  • Data analysis
  • Findings
    • Research Question 1: Strategy use in response to different kinds of vocabulary explanations
  • Qualitative analysis: Strategy patterns by intervention group
  • The L2 group
  • The CS group
  • CFoF group
  • Research Question 2: Strategy use by proficiency level
  • Discussion
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 18 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24019.gra
References (28)
References
Clenton, J., & Booth, P. (2020). Vocabulary and the four skills: Pedagogy, practice, and implications for teaching vocabulary. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1999). Factors in the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary from oral input. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 35–62). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, D., & Lo, Y. Y. (2023). Listening strategies in the English Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom: How students comprehend the teacher input. System, 113 1, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36 (1), 52–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4 (1), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y. (2014). To code or not to code: Dilemmas in analysing think-aloud protocols in learning strategies research. System, 43 1, 74–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennebry, M., Rogers, V., Macaro, E., & Murphy, V. (2013). Direct teaching of vocabulary after listening: Is it worth the effort and what method is best? Language Learning Journal, 45 (3), 282–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51 (3), 539–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobucci, D., Posavac, S., Kardes, F. R., Schneider, M. J., & Popovich, D. L. (2015). Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 1, 652–665 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29 1, 694–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E. (2017). Students’ strategies in response to teachers’ second language explanations of lexical items, Language Learning Journal, 45 (3), 352–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyikos, M., & Fan, M. (2007). A review of vocabulary learning strategies: Focus on language proficiency and learner voice. In A. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learning strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 251–274). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7 (2), 118–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suárez, M. D. M., & Gesa, F. (2019). Learning vocabulary with the support of sustained exposure to captioned video: Do proficiency and aptitude make a difference? The Language Learning Journal, 47 (4), 497–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, L., & Macaro, E. (2012). Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: A Lexical Focus-on-Form study. Language Teaching Research, 16 1, 367–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53 (3), 463–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61 (1), 219–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2021). Research investigating lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don’t know, and what needs to be examined. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33 1, 278–293. [URL]
Yanagisawa, A., & Webb, S. (2022). To what extent does the Involvement Load Hypothesis predict incidental L2 vocabulary learning? A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 71 1, 487–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P. (2018). Comparing different types of EFL vocabulary instruction for Chinese senior secondary school learners of English. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.
Zhang, P., & Graham, S. (2020a). Vocabulary learning through listening: Comparing L2 explanations, teacher codeswitching, contrastive focus-on form and incidental learning. Language Teaching Research, 24 1, 765–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). Learning vocabulary through listening: The role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. Language Learning, 70 1, 1017–1053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Fung, D., & Thomas, N. (2023). Towards deeper learning in EMI lectures: The role of English proficiency and motivation in students’ deep processing of content knowledge. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., & Thompson, G. (2023). Exploring the role of English proficiency, self-efficacy, and motivation in listening for learners transitioning to an English-medium transnational university in China. System, 113 1, DOI logoGoogle Scholar