Interaction researchers often tend to identify themselves and others with the methods they are using, rather than with the topic they are studying. I survey a number of commonly used research methods in human interaction research, and indicate some of their strengths, weaknesses, and relative advantages. I will argue that human interaction is a topic of such massive complexity that it will require not only a multidisciplinary approach, but also, and more importantly, a multimethodological approach. This requires open-mindedness about the use of methods that we happen not to be familiar with. Combining different qualitative and quantitative methods to address similar and converging research questions is essential for gaining progress in the complex field of human interaction.
2023. Gaps in the Lexicon Restrict Communication. Open Mind 7 ► pp. 412 ff.
Nordfalk, Jenny M, Trygve Holmøy, Owen Thomas, Magne Nylenna & Pal Gulbrandsen
2022. Training physicians in providing complex information to patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 12:3 ► pp. e049817 ff.
Albert, Saul & J. P. de Ruiter
2018. Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 10:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
Albert, Saul, J. P. de Ruiter, Rolf Zwaan & Mark Dingemanse
2018. Improving Human Interaction Research through Ecological Grounding. Collabra: Psychology 4:1
de Ruiter, J. P. & Saul Albert
2017. An Appeal for a Methodological Fusion of Conversation Analysis and Experimental Psychology. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Kendrick, Kobin H.
2017. Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.