Aben, B., Stapert, S., & Blokland, A. (2012). About the distinction between working memory and short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(301). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adams, J. M. (2006). The performative nature and function of Isaiah 40–55. Norfolk: T & T Clark.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alston, W. P. (2000). Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amaral, P., & Cummins, C. (2015). A cross-linguistic study on information backgrounding and presupposition projection. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perpsectives on presuppositions (pp. 157–172). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, L. B. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 273–312). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andorno, C. (2005). Che cos’è la pragmatica linguistica. Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Annett, M. (1967). The binomial distribution of right, left and mixed handedness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 327–333. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arbib, M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 105–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austen, J. (1811). Sense and sensibility. Reprinted by ESD Cloud Media, 2014. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, N. D., & Greenfield, P. (1988). The development of new and old information in young children’s early language. Language Sciences, 10(1), 3–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bambini, V. (2010). Neuropragmatics: A foreword. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 1–20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bambini, V. (2012). Neurolinguistics. In J-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bambini, V., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2014). A dataset of metaphors from the Italian literature: Exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context. PLoS ONE, 9, e105634. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Van Berkum, J. J., & Hagoort, P. (2002a). Event-related theta power increase in the human EEG during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters, 323, 13–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Van Berkum, J. J., & Hagoort, P. (2002b). Syntactic processing modulates the theta rhythm of the human EEG. Neuroimage, 17, 1479–1492. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Van der Linden, M., ter Keurs, M., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 530–541. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Oscillatory neural dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baumann, S., & Schumacher, B. P. (2011). (De-)Accentuation and the processing of information status: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Speech, 55(3), 361–381. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benatar, A., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2014). Newness, givenness and discourse updating: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benveniste, E. (Ed.). (1971[1958]). Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics [Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek]. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berger, H. (1929). Über das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr, 87, 527–570. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Best, C. T. (1988). The emergence of cerebral asymmetries in early human development: A literature review and a neuroembryological model. In D. L. Molfese & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Brain lateralization in children (pp. 5–34). New York: Guilford Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, C. (2009). Pragmatica cognitiva. I meccanismi della comunicazione. Roma-Bari: Laterza.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and Human Behavior. Washington: University of Washington Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birch, S., & Rayner, K. (1997). Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 653–660. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, F. (1900). Sketch of the Kwakiutl language. American Anthropologist, 2, 708–721. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, F. (1910). Kwakiutl. An illustrative sketch. Washington: Government Printing Office.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bock, K. J. & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 64–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, D. L. (1965). Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts. Melody in Spoken English. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schumacher, P. B. (2016). Towards a neurobiology of information structure. In F. Caroline & I. Sinichiro (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 581–598). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bréal, M. (1964 [1900]). Semantics: Studies in the science of meaning. New York: Dover.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bredart, S. & Modolo, K. (1988). Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 67, 135–144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brentano, F. (1973[1874]). Psychology from an empirical point of view. Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and Linda L. McAlister, from Psychologie vom empirischen Standtpunkt
, Sections V–IX.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brodmann, K. (1909). Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brody, M. (1990). Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 201–225.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98, 159–168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burkhardt, P. (2007). The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory. Neuroreport, 18(17), 1851–1854. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burkhardt, P., & Roehm, D. (2007). Differential effects of saliency: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 413, 115–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burkhardt, P. (2008). Two types of definites: Evidence for presupposition cost. In A. Grønn (Ed.), Proceedings of SuB12 (pp. 66–80). Oslo: ILOS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burmester, J., Spalek, K., & Wartenburger, I. (2014). Context updating during sentence comprehension: The effect of aboutness topic. Brain and Language, 137, 62–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Büring, D. (2003). On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 511–545. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Camblin, C. C., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 103–128. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell, A. L., Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M. (2000). Factors affecting young children’s use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 1337–1349. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardona, T. R., & Volterra, V. (2007). Le lingue dei segni. Storia e semiotica. Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chemla, E. (2009). Similarity: Towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection. Under revision for Semantics and Pragmatics
.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Massachusetts: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovitz (Eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 183–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 489–558. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood: N. J.-Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cole, M. (1992). Context, modularity, and the cultural constitution of development. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s development within social contexts (pp. 5–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2005). Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archeological Journal, 15(1), 5–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coppock, E. (2014). Introduction to dynamic semantics. Slides available at [URL].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corballis, M. C. (2003). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cory, B., Romoli, J., Schwarz, F., & Crain, S. (2014). Scalar Implicatures vs. Presuppositions: The View from Acquisition. Topoi, 35(1), 57–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowles, H. W., Kluender, R., Kutas, M., & Polinsky, M. (2007). Violations of information structure. An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions. Brain and Language, 102, 228–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (1987). L’articolazione dell’informazione nel parlato. In AA. VV., Gli italiani parlati (pp. 27–90). Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (1992). Le unità d’informazione e la teoria degli atti linguistici. In G. Gobber (Ed.), Atti del XXIV Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Linguistica e pragmatica (pp. 501–529). Roma: Bulzoni.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (2000). Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M. (2010). Informational patterning theory and the corpus-based description of spoken language: The compositionality issue in the topic-comment pattern. In M. Moneglia & A. Panunzi (Eds.), Bootstrapping information from corpora in a cross-linguistic perspective. Firenze: Firenze University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2001). Functional approaches to grammar. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 6323–6330). Oxford: Elsevier Sciences. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, F. (1966). A three-level approach to syntax. In F. Daneš et al. (Eds.), Travaux linguistiques de Prague (pp. 225–240). Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence persepctive (pp. 106–128). Prague: Academia/The Hague-Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. London: Clowes & Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including indepllendent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, S. C. (1978). Functional grammar [North-Holland Linguistic Series 37]. Amsterdam: North-Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domaneschi, F., Carrea, E., Penco, C., & Greco, A. (2014). The cognitive load of presupposition triggers: Mandatory and optional repairs in presupposition failure. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 136–146. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domaneschi, F., & Carrea, E. (2015). Attivatori presupposizionali e failure: uno studio psicolinguistico. Sistemi Intelligenti, 2, 303–322.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domaneschi, F. (Ed.). (2015). Special issue of Topoi on presuppositions: Philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Dordrecht: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domaneschi, F., Carrea, E., Penco, C., & Greco, A. (2016). Selecting presuppositions in conditional clauses. Results from a psycholinguistic experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 2026. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donnellan, K. (1966). Reference and Definite Descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75(3), 281–304. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dudley, R., Orita, N., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2015).
Three-year-olds’ understanding of know and think. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental Perspectives on Presuppositions (pp. 241–262). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dummett, M. (1981). Frege: Philosophy of language, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dummett, M. (2006). Thought and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunn, J. (1988). The beginning of social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meanings: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 540–551. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, M. T. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stanford, PhD Dissertation Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantic description. In C. J. Fillmore & T. D. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 272–289). New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flavell, J., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1990). Developmental changes in young children’s knowledge about the mind. Cognitive Development, 5, 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, B. A. (2001). Evidentiality, authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 11(2), 167–192. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, D., & Katzir, R. (2010). On the characterization of alternatives. Available at: [URL].
Frascarelli, M. (2008). The fine structure of the topic field. In C. De Cat & K. Demuth (Eds.), The Bantu-Romance Connection. A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure (pp. 261–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(2), 78–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frege, G. (1918). Negation: A logical investigation. In P. T. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (2nd ed., pp. 117–135). Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, V. A. (1986). Evidentiality in the Balkans. Macedonian and Albanian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 168–187). Norwood: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gabelentz, von der G. (1869). Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagliardi, G., Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Tamburini, F. (2012). A topologic view of topic and focus marking in Italian. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. M. Doğan, M. Bente, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings 8th International Conference on Language Resources and – LREC 2012 (pp. 948–955). Istanbul: LREC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geurts, B. (1999). Presuppositions and pronouns. [Current research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 3]. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T. (1975). Focus and the scope of assertion: Some Bantu evidence. Studies in African Linguistics, 6, 185–205.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glanzberg, M. (2003). Felicity and presupposition triggers. Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics
. Michigan: University of Michigan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glanzberg, M. (2005). Presuppositions, truth values and expressing propositions. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning and truth (pp. 349–396). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Sensation and perception. USA: Wadsworth.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodnow, J. J., & Warton, P. (1993). Contexts and cognitions: Taking a pluralistic view. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 157–177). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, L. A., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Sciences, 17, 311–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, P. C., & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(2), 2016–2031. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation, a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, P. H. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guiard, Y. (1987). Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 486–517. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 337–364. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–442. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagoort, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Neuropragmatics. In M. S. Gazzaniga & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 667–674). Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, S. (1976). Induction, evolution and accountability. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 58–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. University of Massachussetts, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, I. (1983). On the projection problem for presuppositions. Proceedings of the
Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics
, 114–125.
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hertrich, I., Kirsten, M., Tiemann, S., Beck, S., Whüle, A., Ackermann, H., & Rolke, B. (2015). Context-dependent impact of presuppositions on early magnetic brain responses during speech perception. Brain and Language, 148, 1–12. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, J., & Irvine, J. (Eds.). (1993) Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horn, L. R. (1981). Exhaustiveness and the semantics of clefts. North East Linguistic Society (NELS), 11, 125–142.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornby, P. A. (1971). A psychological investigation of presupposition. Talk presented at the 1971 Summer
Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America
. Buffalo, New York.
Hornby, P. A. (1973). Intonation and syntactic structure in the development of presupposition. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development
, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 18 p.
Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 530–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hruska, C., & Alter, K. (2004). Prosody in dialogues and single sentences: How prosody can influence speech perception. In A. Steube (Ed.), Language, context and cognition. Information structure: Theoretical and empirical aspects (pp. 211–223). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irwin, D. E., Bock, K. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Effects of information structure cues on visual word processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 307–325. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge Mass.: Russian Language Project, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, Harvard University, p. 14. Repub. as SW II, 10 (130-147).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jayez, J., Mongelli, V., Reboul, A., & Henst van der, J. B. (2015). Weak and strong triggers. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 173–193). Dordrecht: Springers International Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jäncke, L., Schlaug, G., & Steinmetz, H. (1997). Hand skill asymmetry in professional musicians. Brain and Cognition, 34, 424–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jäncke, L., Shah, N. J., & Peters, M. (2000). Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 177–183. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics. Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, C. N., & Maratsos, M. P. (1977). Early comprehension of mental verbs: Think and know. Child Development, 48(4), 1743–1747. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jouravlev, O., Stearns, L., Bergen, L., Eddy, M., Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2016). Processing temporal presuppositions: An event-related potential study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaan, E., Harris A., Gibson E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 159–201. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamio, A. (1994). The theory of territory of information. The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 67–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, & M. B. J. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 277–322). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts 135.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: Introduction to model-theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory, Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamp, H., Van Genabith, J., & Reyle, U. (2011). Discourse representation theory. Handbook of philosophical logic, Vol. 15 (pp. 125–394). Netherlands: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karttunen, L. (1973). Presupposition of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169–193.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karttunen, L. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1(1–3), 181-194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan-Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1976). Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 335–384). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kempson, R. M. (1975). Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1986). L’implicite. Paris: Armand Colin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiparsky, C., & Kiparsky, P. (1971). Fact. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovitz (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirby, S. (1999). Function, selection, and innateness. The emergence of language universals. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, M. (2007). Functional similarities between bimanual coordination and topic/comment structure. In S. Ishihara, S. Jannedy, & A. Schwarz (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 8, 61–96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3-4), 243–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Križ, M. (2014). Homogeneity, Non-Maximality, and all. Available at: [URL].
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, M., De Long, K. A., & Smith, J. N. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain. Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (2003). Extreme subjectification: English tense and modals. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günther Radden [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 243] (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langford, J., & Holmes, V. M. (1979). Syntactic presupposition in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 7, 363–383. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, R. J. (2003). Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In G. Thurgood & R. J. LaPolla (Eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (pp. 22–42). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Rocca, D., Masia, V., Maiorana, E., Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Campisi, P. (2016). Brain response to information structure misalignments in linguistic contexts. Neurocomputing, 199, 1–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lempert, H., & Kinsbourne, M. (1985). Possible origin of speech in Selective orienting. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 62–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. USA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levy, R. (2007). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(3), 339–359. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieberman, P. (1984). The biology and evolution of language. USA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, D. W. (1999). The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (1993). Clausole a contenuto presupposto e loro funzione discorsiva in italiano antico. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica dell’Università degli Studi di Firenze, 4, 71–95.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (1995). Tratti linguistici della persuasione in pubblicità. Lingua Nostra, 2-3, 41–51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (1996). A simple test for Theme and Rheme in the clause complex. Language Sciences, 17(4), 357–378. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2000). Grammatica funzionale delle avverbiali italiane. Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2001). La teoria come separatrice di fatti di livello diverso. L’esempio della struttura informativa dell’enunciato. In Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche, Atti del XXXIII Congresso SLI, Napoli 1999 (pp. 151–173). Roma: Bulzoni.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2002). La struttura informativa dell’enunciato. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2004). The relation between mind and language: The innateness hypothesis and the poverty of the stimulus. The Linguistic Review, 21(3-4), 345–387.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2009). La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Masia, V. (2014). Implicitness impact: Measuring texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 161–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Masia, V. (2015a). Cognitive constraints on the emergence of topic-focus structure in human communication. In V. Ganfi & A. Chiera (Eds.), Immagine e pensiero. Bilanci nelle scienze cognitive attuali (pp. 180–204). Roma-Messina: Corisco.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Masia, V. (2015b). Context-dependent information processing: Towards an expectation-based parsing model of Information Structure. In H. Christiansen, I. Stojanovic, & G. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context [LNAI 9405 Series] (pp. 440–453). Switzerland: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Löbner, S. (1985). Definites. Journal of Semantics, 4, 279–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (2012). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor ergo sum? In R. J. Jarvella & K. Wolfgang (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 101–124). New York: Wiley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacFarlane, J. (2011). What is assertion? In J. Brown & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacNeilage, P. F., Studdert-Kennedy, M. G., & Linblom, B. (1984). Functional precursors to language and its lateralization. The American Journal of Physiology, 246, 912–914.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCready, E. (2014). What is evidence in natural language? In E. Mc Cready, K. Yabushita, & K. Yoshimoto (Eds.), Formal approaches to semantics and pragmatics, studies in linguistics and philosophy (pp. 155–180). Netherlands: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 296–305. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martinet, A. (1955). Economie des changements phonétiques, Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: Francke. [trad. it, Economia dei mutamenti fonetici, Torino: Einaudi, 1968].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marty, A. (1918). Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. II, part 1. Abteilung, Halle: Max Niemeyer, Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Masia, V., Canal, P., Ricci, I., Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Bambini, V. (2017). Presupposition of new information as a pragmatic garden path: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 31–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathesius, V. (1939). O tak zvaném aktuálním členĕní vĕty (On the So-Called Topic/Comment Articulation of the Sentence). SaS, 5, 171–174.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mennes, M., Wouters, H., Vanrumste, B., Lagae, L., & Stiers, P. (2010). Validation of ICA as a tool to remove eye movement artifacts from EEG/ERP. Psychophysiology, 47, 1142–1150. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Dunbar, R. (2006). A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 405–423. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molinaro, N., Conrad, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). On the functional nature of the N400: Contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 1–7. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. In C. Morris (Ed.), Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Narasimhan, B., & Dimroth, C. (2008). Word order and information status in child language. Cognition, 107, 317–319. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 149). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, J. (2005). Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The Expression of Modality [The Expression of Cognitive Categories 1] (pp. 1–26). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I., & Sperber, D. (2004). Experimental pragmatics. UK: MacMillan, Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2010). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Article ID 156869 Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 9(5), 105–113.
»![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Orletti, F. (2000). La conversazione diseguale. Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osterhout, L., Holcomb P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental and Psychological Learning, 20, 786–803. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Özcan, A., Tulum, Z., Lamia, P., & Başkurt, F. (2004). Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right- and left-handed subjects. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 19, 874–878. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagin, P. (2004). Is assertion social? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 833–859. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Park, H., & Reder, L. M. (2004). Moses illusion: Implication for human cognition. Available at: [URL].
Partee, B. H., Hajičová, E., & Sgall, P. (1998). Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. Amsterdam: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1842–1857. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piemontese, E. (1996). Capire e farsi capire. Teorie e tecniche della scrittura controllata. Napoli: Tecnodid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierce, C. S. (1934). Belief and judgment. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers, Vol. V. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–784. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Price, H. (1987). Truth and the nature of assertion. Mind, 96, 202–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puglielli, A., & Frascarelli, M. (2008). L’analisi linguistica. Dai dati alla teoria. Italia: Caissa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R. et al. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4), 21–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Récanati, F. (1987). Meaning and force. The pragmatics of performative utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Isn’t it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 277–293. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T. (1982). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(1), 53–94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rigal, R. A. (1992). Which handedness: Preference or performance? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 851–866. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Netherlands: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romoli, J., & Schwarz, F. (2015). An experimental comparison between presupposition and indirect scalar implicatures. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics Series] (pp. 215–240). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GLSA, Dept. of Linguistics, South College, UMASS, Amherst MA 01003.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roth, J. (1979). Die indirekten Erlebnisformen im Bulgarischen: Eine Untersuchung zu ihrem Gebrauch in der Umgangssprache [Slavistische Beiträge 130]. Wiesbaden: Sagner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothschild, D. (2011). Explaining presupposition projection with dynamic semantics. Semantics & Pragmatics, 4(3), 1–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, E. (1922). The fundamental elements of Northern Yana. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Linguistics, 13, 215–234.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, H-J. (1987). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511–580. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, L. de. & Oswald, S. (2009). Argumentation et engagement du locuteur pour un point de vue subjectiviste. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 29, 215–243.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, L. de. (2013). Background relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 178–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, L. de. (2014). Présuppositions discursives, assertion d’arrière-plan et persuasion. In T. Herman & S. Oswald (Éds), Rhétorique et cognition: perspectives théoriques et stratégies persuasives/Rhetoric & Cognition theoretical perspectives and persuasive strategies (pp. 279–311). Berne: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sbisà, M. (2007). Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1984). Theoretical note: Automatic and controlled processing revisited. Psychological Review, 91(2), 269–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumacher, P. B., & Hung, Y-C. (2012). Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 295–310. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwarz, F. (2014). Presuppositions are fast, whether hard or soft – Evidence from the visual world. Proceedings of
SALT
, 24, 1–22.
Schwarz, F., & Tiemann, S. (2015). Presupposition projection in online processing. Available at: [URL].
Schwarz, F. (2015). Presuppositions vs. Asserted content in online processing. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presupposition. Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics (pp. 89–108). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge (pp. 344–369). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., & Benešová, E. (1973). Topic, focus, and generative semantics. Michigan: Scriptor Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simone, R., & Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2010). Natural constraints on language. Nature and consequences. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 63, 205–224.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simone, R., & Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2011). Natural constraints on language. The ergonomics of the software. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 64, 119–141.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simons, M. (2001). On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolenszky (Eds.), SALT XI (pp. 431–448). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil, Backwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, R. C. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–457. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, R. C. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Milton & U. K. Peter (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 471–482). New York: University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Pragmatics 9 (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, R. C. (1999). Context and content: Essays on intentionality in speech and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stoica, P., & Moses, R. (2005). Spectral analysis of signals. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, [Occasional papers, No. 8]. University of Buffalo: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, P. F. (1949). Truth. Analysis, 8, 83–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sturt, P., Sandford, A. J., Stewart, A., & Dawydiak, E. (2004). Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 882–888. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivations: Advances in research and theory 43 (pp. 215–266). USA: Elsevier Science.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tallerman, M. (2007). Did our Ancestors speak a holistic protolanguage? Lingua, 117(3), 579–604. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanner, D., Morgan-Short, K., & Luck, S. J. (2015). How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 997–1009. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S. A. (1985). Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text, 5(1/2), 55–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tiemann, S., Schmid, M., Bade, N., Rolke, B., Hertrich, I., Ackermann, H., et al. (2011). Psycholinguistic evidence for presuppositions: On-line and off-line data. In I. Reich, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung, Vol. 15 (pp. 581–595). Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2003). Mapping brain asymmetry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 37–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C. (2006). Grammaticalization, emergent constructions, and the notion of “newness”. Paper presented at HDLS, Albuquerque, Nov. German trans. [to appear] as “Grammatikalisierung und emergente Konstruktionen". In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Kerstin Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik und grammatische Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C. (2010). Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–70). Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trent, N. (1997). Linguistic coding of evidentiality in Japanese spoken discourse and Japanese politeness. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Foreign Language Education. Austin, University of Texas.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví, E. (1993). Information packaging: A survey. Paper presented at the WOP IS (Word Order, Prosody, and Information Structure), Center for Cognitive Science & Human Communication Research Center, University of Edinburgh.
Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 580–591. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Holleman, B., Nieuwland, M. S., Otten, M., & Murre, J. (2009). Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1092–1099. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2010). The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad – any implications for neuropragmatics? Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 181–208.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van der Sandt, R. A. (1992). Presupposition projection as anaphora. Journal of Semantics, 9, 333–377. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Osstendorp, H., & Kok, I. (1990). Failing to noticing errors in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 105–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vespignani, F., Canal, P., Molinaro, N., Fonda, S., & Cacciari, C. (2010). Predictive mechanisms in idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1682–1700. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, D. (1993). Commitment, types of dialogues, and fallacies. Informal Logic, XIV(2–3), 93–103.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, L., Bastiaansen, M., Yang, Y., & Hagoort, P. (2011). The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: How focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 813–820. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, L., Jensen, O., Van den Brink, D., Weder, N., Schoffelen, J-M., Magyari, L., Hagoort, P., & Bastiaansen, M. (2012). Beta oscillations relate to the N400 during language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 33(12), 2898–2912. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, L., & Schumacher, P. B. (2013). New is not always costly: Evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 363. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ward, P., & Sturt, P. (2007). Linguistic focus and memory: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 73–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weil, H. (1844). De l’ordre des mots dans les langages anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. [En. tr. By Charles William Super as The order of words in the ancient languages compared with that of the modern languages, 1978, Amsterdam, Benjamins].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wetzel, F., & Molfese, D. L. (1992). The processing of presuppositional information contained in sentences: Electrohpysiological correlates. Brain and Language, 42, 286–307. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for features singletons. Journal pf Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483–502. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wray, A. (1998). Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Language and Communication, 18, 47–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wray, A. (2000). Holistic utterances in protolanguage: The link from primates to humans. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & J. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language (pp. 285–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)