Article published in:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2020) ► pp. 147167


Forward to the past

[ p. 163 ]References

Aarsleff, H.
(1988) Introduction. In first ed of Heath’s translation of Humboldt (1836 [1988]) (pp.vii–lxv).
Ansaldo, U.
(2010) Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: Typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics 48.4: 919–950. Crossref link
(1962) The categories on interpretation & prior analytics. London: Heinemann/ Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press [Loeb’s Classics].
Auer, P., Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Muller, F.
(1999) Language in time: the rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Auer, P.
(2009) On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1–13. Crossref link
Beames, J.
(1868) Outlines of Indian philology. London: Trübner and Company.
Beyer, S. V.
(1992) The Classical Tibetan language (SUNY Series in Buddhist Studies). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Bisang, W.
(2013) Die ‘Chinesische Grammatik’ von Georg von der Gabelentz aus typologischer Sicht. Preface to the reprint of: Gabelentz, G. von der. 1881. Chinesische Grammatik. Mit Ausschluss des niederen Stiles und der heutigen Umgangssprache. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Bloomfield, L.
(1933) Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.
Bo, Hanxi (Bauer, M.
) (2013) Georg von der GabeIentz Hanwenjinwei (Chinesische Grammatik) yanjiu [A study of Georg von der GabeIentz’ Chinesische Grammatik]. Shanghai Normal University PhD thesis.
Boas, F.
(1911) Introduction. In F. Boas (Ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages (pp. 1–83). Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology.
Bolinger, D. L.
(1961) Syntactic blends and other matters. Language 37: 366–381. Crossref link
(1976) Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1.1: 1–14.
Boroditsky, L.
(2001) Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43.1: 1–22. Crossref link
(2011) How language shapes thought: The languages we speak affect our perceptions of the world. Scientific American. 304.2: 63–65. Crossref link
Bowerman, M.
(2004) From universal to language-specific in early grammatical development [Reprint]. In K. Trott, S. Dobbinson, & P. Griffiths (Eds.), The child language reader (pp. 131–146). London: Routledge.
(2007) Containment, support and beyond: Constructing topological spatial categories in first language acquisition. In M. Aurnague, M. Hickmann & L. Vieu (Eds.), The categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition (pp. 177–203). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref link
Bowerman, M. & Choi, S.
(2003) Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, R. W. & Lenneberg, Eric H.
(1954) A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49:454–462. Crossref link
[ p. 164 ]
Burnouf, E.
(1825a) Review of “Vergleichende Zcrgliederung der Sanskrita-Sprache und der mit ihm verwandten Sprachen. Erste Abhandlung: Von den Wurzeln und Pronomen erster und zweiter Person” In F. Bopp (Ed.), Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 1825 (pp. 117–148). Journal Asiatique 6 (pp.52–62), (pp.113–124).
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
(2013) Radical Construction Grammar. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 211–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabelentz, G. von der
(1881) Chinesische Grammatik, Mit Ausschluss des niederen Stiles und der heutigen Umgangssprache. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.
(1891 [1901]) Die Sprachwissenschaft: ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. 2nd edn. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.
Gobineau, J. A. de
(1854–5) Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines (4 volumes). Paris: Firmin-Didiot et Compagnie.
Greenberg, J. H.
(1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
Harris, R.
(1981) The language myth. London: Duckworth.
Harris, R. & Taylor, T. J.
(1997) Landmarks in linguistic thought 1: The Western tradition from Socrates to Saussure, 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Heine, B.
(1993) Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1994) Areal influence on grammaticalization. In M. Putz (Ed.), Language contact language conflict (pp. 55–68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Crossref link
(1997a) Cognitive foundations of grammar. NY & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1997b) Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Heine, B. & Claudi, U.
(1986) On the metaphorical base of grammar. Studies in Language 10.2: 297–335. Crossref link
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
(2001) Convergence and divergence in the development of African languages: Some general observations. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Case studies in language change (pp. 225–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herforth, D. D.
(1987) A case of radical ambiguity in Old Chinese: Some notes toward a discourse-based grammar. Suzugamine Joshi Tanki Daigaku Bulletin of Humanities and Social Science Research 34: 31–40.
Hockett, C. F.
(1967 [1977]) Where the tongue slips, there slip I. To honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday 11 October 1966, 910–36. The Hague: Mouton. [Reprinted in Hockett 1977, 226–56].
(1968) The state of the art. The Hague: Mouton.
(1977) The view from language. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
[ p. 165 ]
Hopper, P. J.
(1992) Times of the sign: on temporality in recent linguistics. Time and society 1(2): 223–238. Crossref link
Hopper, P.
(2011) Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp. 22–44). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Crossref link
(2012) Emergent grammar. In J. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 301–314). London & New York: Routledge.
Humboldt, W. von
(1827) Lettre à m. Abel-Rémusat, sur la nature des forms grammaticales en general, et sur le génie de la language chinoise en particular. Paris: Dondey-Dupré père et fils. Available at https://​archive​.org​/search​.php​?query​=source%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fbooks​.google​.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DmW9GAAAAMAAJ%26oe%3DUTF​-8%22
(1836 [1988]) On Language  – The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. Translated by P. Heath. CUP 1988.
(1903–1936) Gesammelte Schriften. In A. Leitzmann (Ed.), 17 Volumes. Berlin: Behr. Crossref link
(1997) Essays on Language. In T. Harden & D. Farrelly (Eds.), Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–449). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Joseph, John E.
1999A Matter of Consequenz: Humboldt, Race and the Genius of the Chinese Language. Historiographia Linguistica 26.89-148. Crossref link
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
LaPolla, R. J.
(1993) Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63.4: 759–813.
(2009) Causes and effects of substratum, superstratum and adstratum influence, with reference to Tibeto-Burman languages. In Y. Nagano (Ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics (Senri Ethnological Studies 75) (pp. 227–237). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
(2003) Why languages differ: Variation in the conventionalization of constraints on inference. In D. Bradley, R. J. LaPolla, B. Michailovsky & G. Thurgood (Eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff (pp. 113–144). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
(2013) Arguments for a construction-based approach to the analysis of Chinese. Edited by T. Chiu-yu. Human language resources and linguistic typology, Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Sinology (pp. 33–57). Taiwan: Academia Sinica.
(2015) On the logical necessity of a cultural connection for all aspects of linguistic structure. In R. D. Busser & R. J. LaPolla (Eds.), Language structure and environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors (pp. 33–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2016) On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology 20.2: 365–375. Crossref link
(2017) Causation as a factor and goal in typological comparisons. Linguistic Typology 21.3: 547–554. Crossref link
[ p. 166 ]
LaPolla, R. J. & Huang, C.
(2003) A grammar of Qiang, with annotated texts and glossary (Mouton Grammar Library 39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Li, B.
(2010) Jiabeilunci Hanwenjingwei (Chinesische Grammatik von Hans Georg Conon von der Gabelentz)hanwenyinlijiaolong – yi shu, shi, lunyu wei zhongxin [Collation on the citation of Chinesiche Grammatik]. Chengdu, China: Southwest Jiaotong University, MA thesis.
Li, F.-K.
(1951[2013]) Zang-Hanxi yuyan yanjiufa [The method of studying Sino-Tibetan languages]. Guoli Beijing Daxue Guoxue Jikan 7.2(1951), republished in Journal of Sino-Tibetan Linguistics 7(2013): 1–10.
Li, J.
(1924) Xin zhu guoyu wenfa [New grammar of the national language]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
(1953) Zhongguo yufa de “cifa” yantao [Discussion of the grammar of words in Mandarin Chinese grammar]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1953.9: 8–12.
Noonan, M.
(1999) Non-structuralist syntax. In M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik & M. Noonan (Eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics Vol. 2 (pp. 11–31). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Studies in Language Companion Series 42]. Crossref link
Reddy, M. J.
(1979) The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renan, E.
(1858) De l’origine du langage (deuxième édition, revue et considérablement augmentée). Paris: Michel Lévy, Frères, Librairies-Éditeurs.
Sapir, E.
(1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Also available as www​.gutenberg​.net​.EBook​.#12629
(1929[1949]) The status of linguistics as a science. Language 5: 207–14. Also in D. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality (1949).
Saussure, F. de
(1916) Cours de linguistique générale. Edited by C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, assisted by A. Riedlinger. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.
Serruys, P. L.
(1981) Towards a grammar of the Shang bone inscriptions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Chinese Studies, August 15–17, 1980 (pp. 313–364). Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Steinthal, H.
(1850) Die Classification der Sprachen dargestellt als die Entwickelung der Sprachidee. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler’s Buchhandlung.
(1860) Charakteristik der hauptsächlichsten Typen des Sprachbaues. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler’s Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Swiggers, P.
(1986) In W. Humboldt (Ed.), Review of Brief an M. Abel-Rémusat: Über die Natur grammatischer Formen im allgemeinen und über den Geist der chinesischen Sprache im besonderen. Nach der Ausgabe Paris 1827 ins Deutsche ubertragen und mit einer Einfuhrung versehen von Christoph Harbsmeier. (Grammatica universalis, 17). Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich From- mann Verlag – Gunther Holzboog 1979 Language 62.2: 456–57.
Tobin, Y.
(2006) Structuralist phonology: Prague School. In Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition, vol. 12, 170–177. Oxford: Elsevier. Crossref link
[ p. 167 ]
Trabant, J.
(2016) Theses on the future of language. In B. Mersman & H. G. Kippenberg (Eds.), The Humanities between global integration and cultural diversity (pp. 135–140). Berlin: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Tsao, F.
(1989) Comparison in Chinese: A topic-comment approach. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 19.1: 152–189.
Wang, K.
(1986) Gu Hanyu dong bing yuyi guanxi de zhiyue yinsu [Factors conditioning the relationship between verbs and objects in Old Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1: 51–57.
Wang, L.
(1985) Zhongguo Gu Wenfa [Ancient Grammar in China]. In Wang Li Wen Ji [Collection of L. Wang’s Works], Vol. 3, 1–85. Jinan: Shandong Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. I.
(1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 95–195). Austin & London: University of Texas Press.
Whorf, B. L.
(1956) Language, thought, and reality; selected writings. Edited by J. B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yao, X.
(2015) Hanwen Jingwei [Chinese translation of Gabelentz 1881]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.