Cover not available
Article published In:
Ethnolinguistic contact across the Indo-Myanmar-Southwestern China mountains
Edited by Alexander R. Coupe, Randy J. LaPolla and Hideo Sawada
[Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:2] 2023
► pp. 119–135

Jinghpaw loanword typology

Is the Jinghpaw lexicon conservative or innovative?

| Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
Jinghpaw is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken in northern Burma and adjacent areas of China and India. The language is known for both its conservative nature (e.g., comparative Tibeto-Burman linguistics) and the innovative nature of its speakers (e.g., social anthropology of highland Burma). In view of this duality, this paper explores the Jinghpaw lexicon asking whether it is conservative enough to shed great light on the reconstruction of the proto-language or whether it is innovative, having undergone a grand-scale lexical replacement under intensive contact. This paper addresses this question by measuring the lexical borrowing rate in the language based on the methodology laid out by the Loanword Typology (LWT) project. The results put Jinghpaw among average borrower languages in terms of the borrowability scale of the world’s languages. This study concludes that the Jinghpaw lexicon, especially its basic vocabulary, is relatively conservative, and the semantic fields affected by borrowing are mostly restricted to those that show high cross-linguistic susceptibility to intercultural influences. The results and discussion in this paper enable further understanding of comparative Tibeto-Burman linguistics and contact linguistics of northern Burma and beyond.
Keywords: Jinghpaw, Tibeto-Burman, borrowability, loanword typology, language contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Overall borrowing rate
    • 3.2Semantic field
    • 3.3Semantic word class
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.00009.kur
References (22)
References
Benedict, Paul K. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Contributing Editor, James A. Matisoff. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dai, Qingxia, & Xu, Xijian. 1995. Jingpoyu cihuixue [Jinghpaw lexicology]. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, Ola. (1913). The Kachins: Their customs and traditions. American Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, & Tadmor, Uri. (2009). The Loanword Typology project and the World Loanword Database. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 1–34). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.). (2009a). Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.). (2009b). World Loanword Database. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from [URL]
Kurabe, Keita. (2016). Phonology of Burmese loanwords in Jinghpaw. Kyoto University Linguistic Research, 351, 91–128. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2017). A classified lexicon of Shan loanwords in Jinghpaw. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics, 111, 129–166. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2018). A classified lexicon of Jinghpaw loanwords in Kachin languages. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics, 121, 99–131. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2019). Where have all the adjectives gone? The case of Jinghpaw. Kyoto University Linguistic Research, 381, 29–47. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2021). Typological profile of the Kachin languages. In Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia: A comprehensive guide (pp.403–432). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund R. (1954). Political systems of highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure. G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Manam, Hpang. (2000). English-Kachin-Myanmar pocket dictionary. Nhkai Bum Literature.Google Scholar
. (2014). Myanmar-Kachin-English dictionary. Zinyadanasaw Literature.Google Scholar
Maran, La Raw. (1964). Shan loan words in Kachin bilingualism in acculturation. MA thesis, The University of Arizona.
Matisoff, James A. (2003). Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2013). Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: Putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 36(2), 15–95.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. (2009). Language contact. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. (1978). Universals of language contact. In Joseph Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 94–122). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. (2010). Turung: A variety of Singpho language spoken in Assam. Pacific Linguistics. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tadmor, Uri. (2009). Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages (pp. 55–75). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, & Kaufman, Terrence. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar