Cover not available
Article published In:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 5:1 (2024) ► pp.132–177

Evidence of a contact-induced change

Relative-correlative clause in a South Central (Kuki-Chin) language of the Tibeto-Burman branch in Bangladesh

| Independent University, Bangladesh | SOAS University of London
South Central Tibeto-Burman (also known as Kuki-Chin) forms a group of fifty languages spoken in the border area of Bangladesh, India and Burma. Due to their geographic distribution, speakers of South Central (SC) languages are in close contact with the superstrate languages, Bangla, Hindi and Burmese. The inevitable consequence of this longstanding contact on lesser-known languages of this region is understudied, especially structural diffusions. This paper presents a detailed discussion on relative-correlative (RC-CRC) construction in Hyow, a Southeastern SC language spoken by approximately four thousand people in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh, where they are in close contact with Bangla and Marma (a dialect of Burmese). This empirical study demonstrates how RC-CRC construction in Hyow is structurally and distributionally similar to those in IA languages, taking a critical look at the existing literature on IA languages and using data therein for a comparative study. In doing so, this paper provides examples from Bangla, Hindi and Sanskrit, and refutes some of the observations made in previous scholarly works. This paper also explores how they might have developed in Hyow, which otherwise uses a nominalization as native strategy for forming relative clauses. Even though most part of this paper discusses the RC-CRC constructions in Hyow as a consequence of language contact, this paper presents new insights on RC-CRC constructions in Bangla as well comparing to other IA languages.
Keywords: language contact, relative-correlative, South Central (Kuki-Chin), Tibeto-Burman, Bangla, Hindi, Sanskrit, Indo-Aryan
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodologies and data
  • 3.Language contact in the CHT
  • 4.Borrowing and replication of RC-CRC
    • 4.1Borrowed RC-CRC
      • 4.1.1The status of the correlative
      • 4.1.2Borrowed correlative pronoun
      • 4.1.3Postposed relative clause as afterthought
      • 4.1.4Postnominal relative clause
      • 4.1.5Double-headed relative clause
      • 4.1.6Borrowing or code-switching
    • 4.2Replicated RC-CRC
      • 4.2.1Position of the RC
      • 4.2.2Status of the head noun
      • 4.2.3Nature of the correlate
      • 4.2.4Reduplication of relative and correlative pronouns
      • 4.2.5Stacking of relative clauses
  • 5.Source of replication
  • 6.Motivation for RC-CRC
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 5 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.00020.zak
References (78)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, Robert. (2001). Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andvik, Erik. (2010). A Grammar of Tshangla. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Ronald. (1982). Tamil (Lingua Descriptive Studies 7). Amsterdam: North.Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald & Kumari. (1997). Malayalam. (Descriptive Grammars Series, Descriptive Grammars). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auderset, Sandra. (2020). Interrogatives as relativization markers in Indo-European. Diachronica, 37 (4), 474–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. (2003). Locality in correlatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21 (3), 485–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brauns, Claus-Dieter & Löffler, Lorenz. (1990). Mru: Hill people on the border of Bangladesh. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam, King, Tracy & Roth, Sebastian. (2007). Urdu Correlatives: Theoretical and Implementational Issues. Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference
Chhangte, Lalnunthangi. (1993). Mizo syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.
Cinque, Guglielmo. (2011). On double-headed relative clauses. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 6 1, 67–91.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alec. (2018). South Asian perspectives on the relative-correlative construction. Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
. (2007). A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Probal. (1980). Questions and relative and complement clauses in a Bangla grammar. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
David, Anne. (2015). Descriptive grammar of Bangla. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice. (2009). Correlative clause features in Sanskrit and Hindi/Urdu. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (Eds.) Historical syntax and linguistic theory (pp. 271–291). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. (1996). Locality in wh-quantification: Questions and relative clauses in Hindi. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 62. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. (2005). Comparative correlatives comparatively. Linguistic Inquiry, 36 (4), 497–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Bruce. (1978). Some universals of relative clause structure. Universals of human language, 4 1, 375–418.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. (2013). Order of Relative Clause and Noun. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed on 2021-10-04.)
Emeneau, Murray. (1956). India as a Lingustic Area. Language, 32 (1), 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick. (2005). Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34 1, 181–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol, Coupe, Alexander, Bartee, Ellen, Hildebrandt, Kristine & Lin, You-Jing. (2008). Syntactic Aspects of Nominalization in Five Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayan Area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area, 31 (2), 97–143.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Harvey, Goldfrey. (1925). History of Burma: From the Earliest Times to 10 March 1824. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri. (2009). Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Salikoko S. Mufwene, Robert Chaudenson, Braj Kachru, Lesley Milroy, Shana Poplack & Michael Silverstein. (2005). Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. (2006). From question to subordination. In Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania (Eds.) The changing languages of Europe (pp. 204–243). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans. (1989). Conjoined we stand: Theoretical implications of Sanskrit relative structures. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 19 ( 1 ), 93–126.Google Scholar
. (2015). Some issues in Sanskrit syntax. Sanskrit syntax, 1–52.Google Scholar
. (2016). Finite and non-finite subordination. In Bashir, Elena & Hock, Hans (Eds.) The languages and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huziwara, Keisuke. (2005). Correlative construction in Cak. Paper presented at 11th Himalayan Language Symposium. Bangkok: Thailand.
. (2008). An overview of grammatical particles in Marma. Paper presented at 41st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. London: SOAS.
. (2015). Nominalization and Related Phenomena in Marma. North East Indian Linguistics, 3 1, 105–119.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias. (2015). Foreign influence in the Burmese language. In International Conference on Burma/Myanmar Studies Burma/Myanmar in Transition: Connectivity, Changes and Challenges (pp. 1–21). Chiangmai: Thailand.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. (2002). Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In Mari Jones & Edith Esch (Eds.) Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra Linguistic Factors (pp. 285–314). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Written language intertwining. In Bakker, Peter and Matras, Yaron (Eds.) Contact Languages, (pp. 273–332). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Samuel. (1972). A grammar of the Hindi language. Рипол Классик.Google Scholar
Kim, Amy, Roy, Palash & Sangma, Mridul. (2011). The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh: A sociolinguistic survey. SIL International.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. (2003). The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Dahl, Östen. (2001). Circum-Baltic Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. (2008). Relative Clause Structures in the Rawang Language. Language and Linguistics, 9 (4), 797–812.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. (1984). Der Relativsatz: Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó. (2009). Correlatives cross-linguistically (Vol. 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop. (2000). Relative asymmetries and Hindi correlatives. In Artemis Alexiadou, André Meinunger, Chris Wilder & Paul Law (Eds.) The syntax of relative clauses (pp. 201–229). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masica, Colin. (1976). Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James. (1972). Lahu Nominalization, Relativization, and Genitivization. In Kimball, John Syntax and Semantics (Vol 11), 237–257. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. (1996). Prozeduralwe Fusion: Grammatische Interferenzschichten im Romanes. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 49 (1), 60–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics, 36.2: 281–331.Google Scholar
. (2020). Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James. (2004). Remarks on adsentential, adnominal, and extraposed relative clauses in Hindi. In Dayal, Veneeta, and Anoop Mahajan (eds.) Clause structure in South Asian languages (pp. 291–311). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montaut, Annie. (2009). Réduplication et constructions en écho en hindi/ourdou. Faits des langues, 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, Mangesh. (1975). Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language, 51 (3), 672–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. (1997). Versatile nominalizations. In Honour of T. Givón, J. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. Thompson (Eds.) Essays of Language Function and Language Type (pp. 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okell, John. (1965). Nissaya Burmese: A Case of Systematic Adaptation to A Foreign Grammar and Syntax. Lingua, 15 1, 186–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Kosei. (2019). The Influence of Burmese on Asho Chin Grammar. Paper presented at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Ozerov, Pavel. (2022). Alternatives to QUD: Alternatives to questions. Functions of Language, 29 (1), 86–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patnaik, B. N. & Pandit, Ira. (1986). Englishization of Oriya. In Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica, Anjani Kumar Sinha (Eds.) South Asian languages: structure, convergence and diglossia (pp. 232–243). Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Peterson, David. (2008). Nominalization in Kuki-Chin and Mru. Paper presented at 41st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. Lodon: SOAS.
Peterson, John. (2011). A grammar of Kharia. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, Carol. (1982). Constraints on language mixing: Intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish-English. Spanish in the United States, 26497.Google Scholar
Phayre, Arthur. (1883). History of Burma, including Burma proper, Pegu, Taungu, Tenasserim, and Arakan. From the earliest time to the end of the first war with British India. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Post, Mark. (2007). A Grammar of Galo. PhD Dissertation. Melbourne, LaTrobe University.
Puri, Vandana. (2011). The influence of English on the history of Hindi relative clauses. Journal of Language Contact, 4 (2), 250–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Gargi, Kumar, Rajesh & Subbarao, Kārumūri. (2020). Kokborok Relative Clauses-A Case Of Syntactic Convergence. [URL]
Salmons, Joe. (1990). Bilingual discourse marking: code switching, borrowing, and convergence in some German-American dialects.Google Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur. (1990). Kannada: Descriptive Grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Srivastav, Veneeta. (1991). The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 9 (4), 637–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subbarao, Kārumūri. (1984). Complementation in Hindi syntax (Vol. 11). Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Subbārāo, Kārumūri. (2012). South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thampoe, Harold. (2016). Sinhala and Tamil: a case of contact-induced restructuring. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University.
Thomason, Sarah & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vittrant, Alice and Watkins, Justin. (2019). The Mainland Southeast Asia Linguistic Area. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2019. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Muhammad. (2017). Contact-induced changes: structural convergence in Hyow, a Tibeto-Burman language of Bangladesh. ENH Seminar Series, Brac University, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
. (2018). A grammar of Hyow. Doctoral dissertation, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
. (2021). Lexical and grammatical borrowings and replications in Hyow, a language of the Bangladesh-Myanmar border area. Paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on Linguistic and Cultural Diversity in the Northeast India – Myanmar– Southwest China Region, Tokyo, Japan.
. (2022). Relative-correlative clauses in Hyow (Khyang): evidence of contact-induced changes. International Conference on Language Documentation focusing on the Internal Structures of Languages, International Mother Language Institute (IMLI), Bangladesh.