Article published in:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2021) ► pp. 135–166

Temporal realization of multimodally designed enactment in Japanese talk-in-interaction

| San Diego State University
This article explores the issue of temporality and projectability regarding the production of enactments – stretches of talk designed as there-and-then verbal and/or non-verbal behaviors – in Japanese conversations. As word order is a practice that interactants employ for projecting the shape of an upcoming turn, the predicate-final structure of Japanese leads to “delayed projectability” (Fox, Hayashi & Jasperson 1996; Tanaka 1999, 2000). Japanese enactments are no exception. In English, “she said” is prototypically produced before enactment and projects a forthcoming utterance as enactment (Lerner & Takagi 1999; Schegloff 1987). In Japanese, however, syntactic markings of enactment appear after enactment and thus retrospectively indicate preceding enactment. Despite the syntactically delayed projectability, the Japanese interactants rarely exhibit difficulty in comprehending enactments. This article demonstrates that the projection of Japanese enactment is assisted by various linguistic and/or non-linguistic resources accumulated in preparation for the launch of enactment and deployed within the design of enactment.
Keywords: Japanese, enactment, predicate-final structure, projectability, interactional linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Formation of Japanese enactment
    • 2.2Projection
  • 3.Method, data, and transcript notations
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Preliminary: Early responses to enactment turns
    • 4.2Vocal enactment’s compositional features and its projectability
    • 4.3Compound TCU as a projection resource for non-vocal enactment
    • 4.4Co-production of enacted materials
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 27 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21002.ari
References
Auer, Peter
(2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text, 25 (1), 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bögels, Sara & Levinson, Stephen C.
(2017) The brain behind the response: Insights into turn-taking in conversation from neuroimaging. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50 (1), 71–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Gerrig, Richard J.
(1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66 1, 764–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
(2006) Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10 (5), 569–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corps, Ruth E., Gambi, Chiara & Pickering, Martin J.
(2018) Coordinating utterances during turn-taking: The role of prediction, response preparation, and articulation. Discourse Processes, 55 (2), 230–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(2007) Assessing and accounting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (Eds.), Reporting Talk (pp. 81–119). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret
(2017) Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Günthner, Susanne
(2018) Introduction: Temporality in interaction. In Arnulf Deppermann & Susanne Günthner (Eds.), Temporality in interaction (pp. 1–23). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, Mondada, Lorenza & Doehler, Simona Pekarek
(2021) Early responses: An introduction. Discourse Processes, 58 (4), 293–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A.
(1996) Interactional units in conversations: Syntax, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Hayashi, Makoto & Jasperson, Robert
(1996) Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 185–237). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara & Robles, Jessica
(2010) It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like. Discourse Studies, 12 (6), 715–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Seiko
(2006) Quoted thought and speech using the mitai-na ‘be-like’ noun-modifying construction. In Satoko Suzuki (Ed.), Emotive communication in Japanese (pp. 53–95). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Yasuyuki
(2000) Kokugo inyoo koobun no kenkyuu [A Study of the quotative structure in Japanese]. Izumi Shoin.Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea
(2000) An innovative German quotative for reporting on embodied actions: Und ich so/und er so “and I’m like/and he’s like. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (1), 24–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Impersonal quotatives and hypothetical discourse. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (Eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives (pp. 3–36). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 225–246). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Transparent vision. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel. A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Time in action. Current Anthropology, 43 (4), 19–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Interactive footing. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (Eds.), Reporting Talk (pp. 16–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
(1997) The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In Susanne Niemeier & Rene Dirven (Eds.), The language of emotions: Conceptualization, expression and theoretical foundation (pp. 247–275). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
(2005) Joint construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica, 156 1, 21–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geffery
(2005) The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quartetly, 68 (1), 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
(1996) Reporting on talk: the use of direct reported speech in a conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29 (2), 219–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 1, 425–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth & Clift, Rebecca
(2007) Reporting Talk. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
(2011) Emergent grammar. In James P. Gee & Michael Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 301–314). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ikeda, Keiko
(2009) Quotation patterns in Japanese political discourse. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (TWPL), 34 1, 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shimako
(2009) Initiating interactive turn spaces in Japanese conversation: Local projection and collaborative action. Discourse Processes, 46 (2), 226–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Suspending talk: Multimodal organization of participation and stance in Japanese. In Arnulf Deppermann & Jürgen Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentially of multimodal resources (pp. 69–96). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1991) List construction as a task and resource. In Geprge Psathas (Ed.), Interactional competence (pp. 63–92). Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Yin
(2012) ‘-Teki’ ni kansuru ichikoosatsu [A study of ‘-teki’]. Research Journal of Graduate Students of Letters, 12 1, 235–248. Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
(2014) Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 65 1, 103–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koester, Almut & Handford, Michael
(2018) It’s not good saying “Well it it might do that or it might not”: Hypothetical reported speech in business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 130 1, 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kushida, Shuya
(2011) Confirming understanding and acknowledging assistance: Managing trouble responsibility in response to understanding check in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (11), 2716–2739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20 (3), 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. & Takagi, Tomoyo
(1999) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (1), 49–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Makino, Seiichi & Tsutsui, Michio
(1986) A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. Japan Times.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny
(2013) Storytelling in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 492–507). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E.
(1975) A reference grammar of Japanese. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
(2018) The form and meaning of the dangling mitaina construction in a network of constructions. In Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto & Junko Mori (Eds.), Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture (pp. 75–98). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, Patricia
(1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language, 14 1, 325–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K.
(2005) Another conversation: expressivity of Mitaina and inserted speech in Japanese discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 37 (6), 837–869. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Linguistic creativity in Japanese discourse: Exploring the multiplicity of self, perspective, and voice. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGloin, Naomi H.
(1980) Some observations concerning no desu expressions. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 15 (2), 117–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morita, Emi
(2005) Negotiation of contingent talk: The Japanese interactional particles ne and sa. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Kanae
(2009) Interactive negotiation of perspectives in Japanese: Predicate-final structure as a resource to organize interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Nakano, Yuri
(2009) ‘Noda’ ni mirareru futatsu no kinoo [Two usages of ‘noda’]. Journal of International Student Center, 13 1, 40–57. Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
Nishizaka, Aug
(2017) A sentence dispersed within a turn-at-talk: Response-opportunity places as loci for interactional work. East Asian Pragmatics, 2 (2), 229–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Hatsugen junban nai ni oite bunsan suru bun [Dispersed sentences within a turn-at-talk]. Shakaigengo Kagaku [Japanese Journal of Language in Society], 10 (2), 83–95.Google Scholar
Elinor Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A.
(1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oikawa, Ryoko
(2000) Functional variety of toka as a quotative marker in conversational Japanese. The Research Center for Japanese Language Education annual bulletin, 9 1, 77–108. International Christian University.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
(1995) Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), In Essays in semantics and pragmatics: In honor of Charles J. Fillmore (pp. 201–218). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geffrey
(2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68 1, 939–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Benjamin M.
(2008) A resource for repair in Japanese talk-in-interaction: The phrase TTE YUU KA . Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (2), 227–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Federico
(2010) Questioning and responding in Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (10), 2756–2771. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Richard Baumann & Joel Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on Conversation, vol. 2. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 1, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question?’ Sociological Inquiry, 50 (3–4), 104–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organization. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 70–85). University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of interaction and grammar. In Elinor A. Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In Makoto Hayashi, Geffery Raymond & Jack Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 41–70). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margaret
(1996) On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6 1, 371–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margaret & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(2001) Studies in interactional linguistics. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
(2006) Coordinating gesture, talk and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (4), 377–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
(2002) Grammars, words, and embodied meanings: On the evolution and uses of ‘so’ and ‘like.’ Journal of Communication, 52 1, 581–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suga, Ayumi
(2012) Jitsuen to warai niyoru katari rensa [Enactment and laughter in storytelling sequence]. In Akiko Yoshimura, Ayumi Suga & Naoko Yamamoto (Eds.), Kotoba o mitsumete –Uchida Seeji kyooju taikan kinen ronbunshuu [Observing linguistic phenomena: A festschrift for Professor Seiji Uchida on the occasion of his retirement from Nara Women’s University], 425–436. Eihoosha.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko
(1995) A study of the sentence-final mitaina . The journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 29 (2), 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) (Inter)subjectification in the quotative tte in Japanese conversation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 8 (2), 207–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko
(1999) Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Turn projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (1), 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teramura, Hideo
(1982) Nihongo no shintakusu to imi [Syntax and semantics of Japanese], vol. 11. Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko
(2014) Reenactments in conversation: Gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies, 16 (6), 816–846. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
(2007) An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vatanen, Anna
(2018) Responding in early overlap: Recognitional onsets in assertion sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (2), 107–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vatanen, Anna, Endo, Tomoko & Yokomori, Daisuke
(2021) Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Projection in Overlapping Agreements to Assertions: Stance-Taking as a Resource for Projection. Discourse Processes, 58 (4), 308–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Venhuizen, Noortje J., Crocker, Matthew W. & Brouwer, Harm
(2019) Expectation-based comprehension: Modeling the interaction of world knowledge and linguistic experience. Discourse Processes, 56 (3), 229–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar