Cover not available
Article published In:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 3:1 (2022) ► pp.109–140
Notes and discussions

Remarks on gapless relative clauses and complement clauses in Mandarin Chinese

| The Chinese University of Hong Kong
This paper makes remarks on the syntactic status of Gapless Relative Clauses (GRCs) in Mandarin Chinese and shows that the arguments for their complement status are not supported by the facts in Mandarin Chinese, as almost all the arguments for the complement clause analysis of GRCs, as presented in Huang (2016), could be argued to be evidence for the relative clause (RC) analysis of GRCs. The following RC recoverability hierarchy, Argument RC > Adjunct RC > GRC, is proposed to explain the contrasts discussed in Huang (2016) and this paper, and the relevant facts and differences could be accounted for if one assumes that the RCs further to the right in the hierarchy above are more difficult to be recovered than the RCs further to the left in the above hierarchy and should thus occur closer to the head noun. This paper demonstrates that GRCs are really RCs licensed by a covert semantic variable, and suggests that the gapless requirement on complement clauses be replaced by the following two conditions: (a) no syntactic gap or semantic variable exists in the relevant clause that is related to the head noun in question and (b) a semantic condition, to be specified in this paper, is necessary on the relationship between the clause in question and the modified head noun.
Keywords: Chinese, syntax, relative clauses, complement clause, semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Huang’s (2016) arguments and their limitations
    • 2.1Word order
    • 2.2Subcategorization
    • 2.3The distribution of Suo ‘所’
    • 2.4Coordination
    • 2.5Iteration
    • 2.6Long distance extraction
    • 2.7N′ ellipsis
    • 2.8Nominalization
  • 3.GRCs are RCs licensed by a semantic variable
  • 4.RC recoverability hierarchy
  • 5.Conditions on NC clauses
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 5 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21008.pan
References (17)
References
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Furukawa, Y. (1989). The structure of “de_s” and its modifiable nouns, Language Teaching and Research, No. 1, pp. 10–25.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot. (1981). Explanation in Linguistics: the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hu, J. H. and H. H. Pan. (2009). Decomposing the aboutness condition for Chinese topic constructions, The Linguistic Review, 26(9), pp 371–384, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. T. James. (2016). The syntax and semantics of prenominals: construction or composition? Language and Linguistics, 17(4), 431–475.Google Scholar
Li, Qiang. (2015). Hidden predicates, participant roles, and the structure of NP1 de NP2 , Studies in Language and Linguistics, No. 4, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
Lu, S. and H. H. Pan. (2019). Revisiting the hidden predicate issue from the perspective of “NP de NP” noun phrase structures, Language Teaching and Research, No. 3, pp. 56–58.Google Scholar
Pan, H. H. and J. H. Hu. (2003). Head noun movement, focus, and topicalization in Mandarin Chinese, In: Xu, Jie, Donghong Ji, and K. T. Lau (eds.) Chinese Syntax and Semantics, Singapore, August 2003, pp. 119–156.Google Scholar
. (2008). A semantic–pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese, Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 10 November 2008, pp 1966–1981. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, H. H. and S. Lu. (2013). The problems of the DeP analysis and its possible solution, Studies in Language and Linguistics 33(3): 53–61, October 2013.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole, editor, Radical Pragmatics, pages 223–56. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, D. X. (2000). Topic and topic–comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76 (2), 383–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Nouns and Nominal Structures. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, C., Y. Yang. (2013). The licensing conditions of English and Chinese relative structures. Linguistic Sciences, No. 4, pp. 357–370.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. L. (1995). Hidden predicates and their syntactic effects, Studies of the Chinese Language, No. 4, pp. 241–255.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. X. (1983). Self-referring and reference shift: the syntax and semantics of Chinese nominalization markers “de, zhe, zhi, suo”, Dialects, No.1, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

马, 艳晓
2023. The Current Research and Future Development of Formal Linguistics—A Review of the 9th International Conference on Formal Linguistics. Modern Linguistics 11:03 ► pp. 1264 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.