Cover not available
Article published In:
Classifiers
Edited by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
[Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2] 2022
► pp. 202–238

Classifiers in nDrapa

A Tibeto-Burman language in Western Sichuan

| Southwest Jiaotong University
This paper introduces noun categorization devices in nDrapa. It argues that nDrapa usually requires both numeral classifiers and verbal action classifiers to express classificatory techniques. Morphologically, classifiers are fused with numerals; without the involvement of classifiers, numerals cannot be directly associated with nouns. Classifiers can derive from the pragmatic function, in which a considerable number of classifier-derived quantifiers and adverbs reveal the adverbial function with respect to the softening voice and politeness. Historically, the majority of classifiers can trace their etyma back to nouns. This paper’s five sections explore the grammatical properties of classifiers in nDrapa. In Section 2 and Section 3, I provide background information on numerals and numeral classifiers, and describe the characteristics of verbal action classifiers in nDrapa. Section 4 explores expressions relevant to classifier-related grammatical categories. In Section 5, I summarize the pragmatic and functional properties of classifiers in nDrapa. In Section 6, I introduce the origin and development of classifiers in this language. To conclude this paper, I propose that the limited number of classifiers in nDrapa may exhibit an infant development of classificatory devices in this language.
Keywords: nDrapa language, classifiers, categorization devices, morphosyntactic properties, pragmatic use, historical development
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Numerals and numeral classifiers in nDrapa
    • 2.1Numerals
    • 2.2Numeral classifiers
      • 2.2.1Sortal classifiers
        • 2.2.1.1The general classifier
        • 2.2.1.2Shape classifiers
        • 2.2.1.3The honorific classifier
        • 2.2.1.4Functional classifiers
        • 2.2.1.5Other numeral classifier
      • 2.2.2Mensural classifiers
  • 3.Verbal action classifiers
  • 4.Classifiers and other related grammatical categories
    • 4.1Quantifiers
    • 4.2Adverbials
  • 5.Functions of classifiers in discourse
    • 5.1The anaphoric function
    • 5.2Definiteness versus indefiniteness
  • 6.Origin and development of nDrapa classifiers
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22009.hua
References (48)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Imperatives and Commends. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2019). Noun categorization devices: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Aikhenvald and Elena I. Mihas (Eds.), Genders and Classifiers: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. (1977). Classifiers. Languages 531: 284–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bai, Junwei. (2019). Numeral classifiers in Munya, a Tibetan-Burman language. In Alexandra Aikhenvald and Elena I. Mihas (Eds.), Genders and Classifiers: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 282–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter. (1999). Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In Jadranka Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide (pp. 113–186). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1968 [2011]). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press [Reprinted by the Commercial Press].Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia. (2012). The Qiangic subgroup from an areal perspective: A case study of languages of Muli. Language and Linguistics 13(1): 133–170.Google Scholar
Coblin, Weldon South. (1986). A Sinologist’s Handlist of Sino-Tibetan Lexical Comparisons (Monumenta Serica Monograph Series, 18). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, Nancy. F. (1981). The Semantic and Syntax in Numeral Classification in Tai and Austronesian. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Croft, William. (1994). Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word 45(2): 145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daudey, Henrëitte. (2014). A Grammar of Wadu Pumi. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Central for Research on Language Diversity, La Trobe University, Australia.
DeLancey, Scott. (1986). Toward a history of Thai classifier systems. In Colette Craig (Ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification (pp. 437–452). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). Semantic categorization in Tibetan Honorific nouns. Anthropological Linguistics 401: 109–123.Google Scholar
Denny, Peter J. (1976). What are noun classifiers good for? Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 121: 122–132.Google Scholar
(1986). The semantic role of classifiers. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification (pp. 297–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus Sizhi. (2014). A Grammar of Prinmi – Based on the Central Dialect of Northwest Yunnan, China. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. (1997). Head classes and agreement classes in the Mayali dialect chain. In Mark Harvey and Nicholas Reid (Eds.), Nominal Classification in Aboriginal Australia (pp. 105–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol and Kristine Hildebrandt. (2004). The two adjective classes in Manange. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Aikhenvald (Eds.), Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 74–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gong, Qunhu ( 龚群虎). (2007). Zhabayu yanjiu 扎巴语研究 [A Study of the nDrapa Language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1972). Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis type, working papers in languages universals. Reprinted in K. Denning and S. Kemmer (Eds.), On Language: Selected Writings of Joseph H Greenberg (pp. 16–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hass, Mary. (1942). The use of numeral classifiers in Thai. Language 181: 201–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer. (1991). From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization (Vol. 11) (pp. 149–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Bufan (黄布凡). (1990). Zhabayu gaikuang 扎坝语概况 [A Survey of the nDrapa Language]. Journal of Minzu University of China (中央民族大学学报) 41: 71–82.Google Scholar
Huang, Bufan ( 黄布凡). (1992). Zangmianyuzu yuyan cihui 藏缅语族语言词汇 [A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon]. Beijing: Central Institute of Minorities.Google Scholar
Huang, Yang ( 黄阳). (2020). Zhabayu de mingwuhua he guanxihua 扎坝语的名物化和关系化 [Nominalization and Relativization in nDrapa]. Minzu Yuwen (民族语文) 41: 29–42.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. (2021). A Grammar of Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Li. (2015). A Grammar of Guìqióng: A Language of Sichuan. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog, Seongha Rhee. (2019). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. (2004). On nominal relational morphology in Tibeto-Burman. In Ying-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang, and Dah-an Ho (Eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in Hornor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday (pp. 43–73). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. with Chenglong Huang. (2003). A Grammar of Qiang, with Annotated Texts and Glossary. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chungmin. (2021). Definiteness, specificity, and genericity in numeral classifier languages. In Chungmin Lee, Young-Wha Kim and Byeong-uk Yi (Eds.), Numeral Classifiers and Classifier Languages: Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 121–136). London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. (1997). Classifiers in Korean. Honours thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
Lu, Shaozun ( 陆绍尊). (2007). Queyu yu 却域语 [The Choyo Language]. In Hongkai Sun, Zengyi Hu and Xing Huang (Eds.), Zhongguo de yuyan 中国的语言 [The Languages in China] (pp. 1059–1075). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lü, shuxiang ( 吕叔湘). (2006). Xiandai Hanyu Babaici 现代汉语八百词 [The Eight Hundred Words in Mandarin]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (2 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. (2015). The Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus. Berkeley: University of California. Data available online at the STEDT database accessed via [URL] on 2022-07-01.
Matthews, Stephen. (2006). Cantonese grammar in areal perspective. In Alexandra, Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Grammars in Contact. A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 220–236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko and Marielle Prins. (2013). rGyalrongic Language Database. Minpaku. Accessed via STEDT database [URL] on 2022-07-06.
Shirai, Satoko. (2010). Depago no ‘kaku’ o arawasu keesiki [Case markers in nDrapa]. In Hideo Sawada (Ed.), Tibetto=Birumakeegengo no bunpoogensyoo 1: Kaku to sono syuuhen [Grammatical Phenomena in Tibeto-Burman Languages 1: Case and Related Phenomena] (pp. 287–310). Fuchu: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
. (2019). N-based Nominalization in nDrapa. Paper presented at the Fifth Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Southwest China, August 21–23, 2019. Tianjing: Nankai University.
. (2020). Dapago no meesisyuusyokuhyoogen to meesikuhyoosiki [Noun-modifying expressions and NP-use marker in nDrapa]. In Prashant Pardeshi and Kaoru Horie (Eds.), Nihongo to sekai no gengo no meesisyuusyokuhyoogen [Noun-Modifying Expressions in Japanese and Languages of the World] (pp. 97–117). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
. (2022). Classifiers in nDrapa: Definition and categorization. Gengo Kenkyu No. 166.Google Scholar
Shirai, Satoko and Yang Huang ( 黄阳). (2022). A Geolinguistic Approach to nDrapa Dialectology. Paper presented at the 55th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, September 15–18, 2022. Kyoto: Kyoto University.
Sun, Hongkai ( 孙宏开). (2013). Bajiangliuyu de zangmianyu 八江流域的藏缅语 [The Tibeto-Burman Languages along the Eight River Area]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (1993). Tani Synonym Sets (unpublished ms. contributed to STEDT). Accessed via STEDT database [URL] on 2022-07-08.
Zhang, Sihong. (2014). Numeral classifiers in Ersu. Language and Linguistics 15(6): 883–915. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubin, David. A., and Mitsuaki Shimojo. (1993). How ‘general’ are general classifiers? With special reference to ko and tsu in Japanese. In J. S. Guenter et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals 191: 490–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar