Cover not available
Article In:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2024) ► pp.310–336

Cognitive, linguistic, and socio-cultural perspectives on classifier usage

A diachronic and synchronic semantic study of the classifier 只 (zhī) in Modern Mandarin

ORCID logo | University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa
Classifiers serve as tools for exploring how individuals use languages to cognitively categorize the world within social contexts. 只 (zhī), a prevalent classifier in modern Mandarin using simplified Chinese characters, categorizes both animate and inanimate referents, with the latter lacking significant similarities in shape or function. This paper conducts a corpus-based diachronic and synchronic semantic analysis of 只 (zhī) to reveal associations among its classified referents. It discovers that canonical referents classified by 只 (zhī) in simplified Chinese writing stem from two semantic meanings: “bird” and “one out of a pair”, linked to the original meaning of 隻 (zhī) from which the classifier 只 (zhī) originates. Additionally, 只 (zhī) is creatively used in the Internet Chinese language to categorize human referents, contributing to a playful style. The study identifies how cognitive and socio-cultural factors, in addition to lexical borrowing, influence the usage of 只 (zhī), aiding in the understanding of the comprehensive motivations behind Chinese classifier usage.
Keywords: classifier 只 (zhī), semantic study, cognitive motivation, socio-cultural factor, Chinese character
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Origins of the classifiers 隻 (zhī) and 只 (zhī)
    • 2.2Usages of classifiers 隻 (zhī) and 只 (zhī)
    • 2.3The stylistic effects of classifiers and emerging usages of classifiers
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Methods
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Development of Classifiers 隻 (zhī) and 只 (zhī)
      • 5.1.1Old Chinese: The usages of the classifier 隻 (zhī) and 只 (zhī) are under development
      • 5.1.2Middle Chinese: The usages of the classifier 隻 (zhī) and 只 (zhī) are developing
      • 5.1.3Early Mandarin: The usages of the classifier 隻 (zhī) and 只 (zhī)
      • 5.1.4Modern Mandarin: Usages of the classifier 只 (zhī)
      • 5.1.5Semantic network of the classifier 只 (zhī) in simplified modern mandarin Chinese
    • 5.2Emerging usages of 只 (zhī) as a human classifier in the internet Chinese language
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Cognitive motivation behind the usages of the classifier 只 (zhī)
    • 6.2Characteristics of the Chinese language affect the development of Chinese classifiers
    • 6.3Socio-Cultural factors behind the emerging usages of classifiers
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (61)
References
Academia Sinica Tagged Corpus of Old Chinese. Retrieved from [URL]
Academia Sinica Tagged Corpus of Middle Chinese. Retrieved from [URL]
Academia Sinica Tagged Corpus of Early Mandarin Chinese. Retrieved from [URL]
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019). Noun categorization devices: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Elena I. Mihas (Eds.), Genders and Classifiers: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Mihas, Elena I. (Eds.). (2019). Genders and Classifiers: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2022). Classifiers: Setting the scene An introduction to the special issue on classifiers in the languages of Asia. Asian Languages and Linguistics, 3(2), 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 53 (2), 284–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beijing Language and Culture University (BLCU) Corpus Center. Retrieved from [URL]
Bisang, Walter. (1999). Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and Beyond. In Jadranka Gvozdanović (Eds.). Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide (Vol. 1181, pp. 113–185). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chawla, Chanyaporn. (2016). A Semantic Study of the Classifier 只zhī, 个gè And 条tiáo in Mandarin and Three Southern Chinese Dialects. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 19(1), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chou, Bi-Hsiang. (2017). 回歸文字之本-談漢語近義量詞分辨 [Returning to the Essence of Words — Discussing the Differentiation of Synonymous Classifiers in Chinese]. 華文世界 [The World of Chinese Language], (119), 116–141.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, Mary. (1986). Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Colette G. Craig (Eds.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 399–436). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, Ming Y. and Barbara C. Malt. (2009). Mental representation and cognitive consequences of Chinese individual classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (7–8), 1124–1179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Xianzhen. (2002). 现代汉语量词用法词典 [A dictionary of modern Chinese quantifiers]. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.Google Scholar
He, Jie. (2000). 现代汉语量词研究 [Research on Measure Words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Holz, Christoph. (2022). The classifiability scale: A cross-linguistic study on the occurrence of numeral classifiers. Asian Languages and Linguistics, 3(2), 331–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Y. (2004). 敦煌社会经济文书中之量词研究 [Quantifier research in Dunhuang’s social and economic documents]. Taipei: Wenjin Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, Kyoko. (2000). Visualizing ability and nominal classification: Evidence of cultural operation in the agreement rules of Japanese numeral classifiers. In G. Senft (Ed.), Systems of nominal classification (pp. 217–238). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jarkey, Nerida and Hiroko Komatsu. (2019). Numeral classifiers in Japanese. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Elena I. Mihas (Eds.) Genders and Classifiers: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, (pp. 249–281). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Song. (2004). A Semantic Study of the Classifier Dao . In M. Achard and S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture and Mind, (pp.429–443). LA, Standard: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, Stanford University.Google Scholar
. (2016). An Embodied Construction Grammar Approach to the Semantic Overlap of Chinese Classifiers: The case of tiao and dao. Macao Journal of Linguistics, 48 (2), 91–106.Google Scholar
. (2017). The Semantics of Chinese Classifiers and Linguistic Relativity (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiao, Yumei. (2017). 非形貌類個體量詞語義、性質及用法研究 [Study of the Semantics, Nature, and Usage of Classifiers without shape characteristics], 중국문학연구 [Chinese Literature Research], 671, 127–147.Google Scholar
Jin, Yingzhe and Xinren Chen. (2020). “Mouren” (“Somebody”) can be you-know-who: A case study of mock referential vagueness in Chinese Weibo posts. Journal of Pragmatics, 1641, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komatsu, Hiroko. (2018). Prototypes and metaphorical extensions: The Japanese numeral Classifier hiki and hatsu. PhD thesis, The University of Sydney. [URL]
Lee, Michael. (1987). The cognitive basis of classifier systems. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 395–407). Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liang, Neal Szu-Yen. (2008). The Acquisition of Chinese Shape Classifiers by L2 Adult Learners. In Marjorie K. M. Chan and Hana Kang (Eds.). (2008). Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20) Volume 1 (pp.309–326). Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing. (1988). 汉语量词的宏观分析[The macroscopic analysis of Chinese classifiers]. 汉语学习 [Chinese Language Learning], 41, 5–7.Google Scholar
. (2017). 语法调查研究手册(第二版) [A Handbook for Grammatical Investigation and Research 2nd edition]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Liu, Shiru. (1965). 魏晋南北朝量词研究 [Quantifier research in the Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. (1980). 现代汉语八百词 [Eight Hundred Words of Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Loke, Kit-Ken. (1996). Norms and realities of Mandarin Shape Classifiers. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 31(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
Loke, Kit-Ken and Godfrey Harrison. (1986). Young children’s use of Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin) sortal classifiers. In Henry S. R. Kao and Rumjahn Hoosain. (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language, (pp.125–146). Hong Kong: Center of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ma, Aimin. (2015). 汉语个体量词的产生与发展 [The origin and development of Chinese individual quantifiers]. China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Rusen. (2008). 殷墟甲骨文实用字典 [Yinxu Oracle Bone Script Practical Dictionary]. Shanghai: Shanghai University Press.Google Scholar
Polio, Charlene. (1994). Non-native speakers’ use of nominal classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teacher Association, 29(3), 51–66.Google Scholar
Qiu, Xigui. (1988). 文字学概要 [Introduction to Philology]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Sang, He. (1990). 简化、繁体、异体汉字综合字表: 《简化字总表》《第一批异体字整理表》《印刷通用汉字字形表》的综合字表 [Comprehensive Character Table of Simplified, Traditional, and Variant Chinese Characters: A compilation of the General Table of Simplified Characters, First Batch of Variant Characters Compilation Table, and Printed Commonly Used Chinese Character Form Table]. Shanghai Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Shi, Heidi H. and Zhuo Jing-Schmidt. (2020). Little cutie one piece: An innovative human classifier and its social indexicality in Chinese digital culture. Chinese Language and Discourse, 11(1), 31–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Tianguan. (2016). 现代汉语量词“只” 的认知研究 [The Cognitive Study of “zhi” in Modern Chinese]. 黑龙江教育学院学报 [Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education], 35 (4), 100–102.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. (1988). The discourse function of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 21, 298–322. [URL]
Tai, James H-Y. and Lianqing Wang. (1990). A Semantic Study of the Classifier Tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 25(1), 35–56.Google Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. (1992). Variation in classifier systems across Chinese dialects: Towards a cognition-based semantic approach. Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology (pp. 587–608), Academia Sinica, No. 2.Google Scholar
(1994). Chinese Classifier Systems and Human Categorization. In Matthew Y. Chen. and Ovid J. L. Tzeng. (Eds.), Essays in Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang, (pp. 479–494). Taipei: Pyramid Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tien, Yi-Min, Ovid. J. L. Tzeng, and Daisy L. Hung. (2002). 漢語分類詞的語義與認知基礎: 功能語法觀點 [Semantic and Cognitive Basis of Chinese Classifiers: A Functional Approach]. Language and Linguistics, 3 (1), 101–132.Google Scholar
Wang, Chuqing. (2003). 中國文字結構——六書釋例 [The Structure of Chinese Characters: Six Examples of Character Analysis]. Taipei: Hungyeh Publishing Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Wang, Li. (1958). 汉语史稿 [History of the Chinese Language]. Science Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Sicheng. (2015). 指人名词与个体量词新兴搭配研究 [A study of the emerging collocations of personal nouns and individual quantifiers]. Master’s thesis, Nanjing University.
Wang, Xiaoyan. (2021). 量词“只”的形成及其历时演变 [The Formation and Diachronic Evolution of the Classifier 只(zhī)]. 汉字汉语研究 [The Study of Chinese Characters and Language], 11, 68–76.Google Scholar
Wang, Li., Qixiang Cen, Tao Lin, Li Dai, Zuofan Tang, Shaoyu Jiang, Wanqi Zhang, and Minxia Xu. (2009). 古汉语常用字字典 [Dictionary of Commonly Used Ancient Chinese Characters] (6 ed.). The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Waugh, L. R. and Lafford, Barbara. (2006). Markedness. In R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.), (pp. 419–498). New York: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weibo Data Center. (n.d.). 微博2020用户发展报告 [The report on the development of Weibo users]. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2024, from [URL]
Xia, Liping. (2020). 湘语益阳 (泥江口) 方言参考语法 [The Reference Grammar of Xiang Dialect in Yiyang (Nijiangkou)]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Xie, Guanghui. (1997). 常用汉字图解 [An illustrated account of the compositions of common Chinese characters]. Beijing: Peking University Press. [In Chinese]Google Scholar
Xu, Shen and Duan, Yucai. (2007). In Xu, Weixian (Eds.), 说文解字注 [Interpretations of Explanations of simple graphs and analyses of composite graphs]. Phoenix Publishing and Media Group.Google Scholar
Zhang, Hong. (2007). Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16 (1), 43–59. [URL]. DOI logo
Zhang, Dayan. (2017). 从“帅哥一枚”看量词“枚” [Analysis on the classifier 枚(méi) fromthe construction of “帅哥一枚(shuài gē yī méi)”]. 现代语文 [Modern Linguistics], 21, 126–127.Google Scholar
Zhang, Cheng. (2012a). 汉语通用量词的发展与汉语量词范畴的确立 [The relation between the development of general classifiers and the establishment of the category of numeral-classifiers in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 40 (2), 307–321. [URL]
. (2012b). 类型学视野的汉语名量词演变史 [A historical evolution of Chinese classifiers from the perspective of typology]. Peking University Press.Google Scholar