Cover not available
Article In:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2024) ► pp.337–358

A typological study on person sensitivity in Ersu

ORCID logo | Hefei University of Technology
 | Hefei University of Technology
Since the “conjunct vs. disjunct” distinction was employed to describe the interaction between person and other grammatical categories or functional factors in Kathmandu Newari, the linguistic phenomenon has been widely discussed and different terms such as “self person vs. other person” and “egophoric vs. non-egophoric” distinction have also been used. However, there are always widespread parameters of variations found in specific languages. Ersu, a language quite sensitive to person distinction, is a case in point. Firstly, it not only has two different sets of first person pronouns but also has two different sets of third person pronouns. Moreover, it has differentiated person-based marking strategies of prospective, prospective, imminent and perfect aspects. Ersu not only shares some similarities with those person distinction languages, but also boasts of its own uniqueness. Therefore, we proposed to use “person sensitivity” as a more general and suitable term to describe the linguistic phenomenon in cross-languages.
Keywords: Ersu, person distinction, disjunct vs. conjunct, self person vs. other person, egophoric vs. non-egophoric, person sensitivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Data collection and analysis
  • 4.Ersu person distinction system
    • 4.1First person distinction
    • 4.2Third person distinction
  • 5.Ersu person sensitive aspectual marking system
    • 5.1Marking of progressive aspect
    • 5.2Marking of prospective aspect
    • 5.3Marking of imminent aspect
    • 5.4Marking of perfect aspect
  • 6.Discussion and summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (74)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2014). The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp.1–50). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Åkerman, Vesa (2012). Inflection of finite verbs in Mongghol. SIL Electronic Working Papers, 2012(003), 1–61.Google Scholar
Bendix, Edward H. (1992). The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: Interactional manipulation of evidential categories in Newari. In Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine (Eds), Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse (pp. 226–247). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik (2018). The role of sentence type in Ika (Arwako) egophoric marking. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 347–376). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Glenn A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. 〈 DOI logo〉Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia (2008). baimayu shizheng fanchou ji qi yu Zangyu fangyan de bijiao [Evidentials in Baima and Tibetan dialects compared]. Minzu yuwen [Minority Languages], 31, 36–43.Google Scholar
(2017). Lizu (Ersu). In Randy J. LaPolla and Graham Thurgood (Eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages (2nd edition) (pp. 823–839). Routledge.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia, & Wang, Dehe (2017). Verbal Aspect in Ersu. Language and Linguistics, 18 (3), 355–382.Google Scholar
Clynes, Adrian (1995). Topics in the Phonology and Morphosyntax of Balinese: Based on the Dialect of Singaraja, North Bali. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
Comrie, Bernard (1976). Aspect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis (2008). Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: Functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 61(4), 309–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Language documentation and verb inflection typology: The case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Chronos 9.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy J. (1997). A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of Southwestern Colombia. Phd dissertation, Australian National University.
(2002). Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics, 40(3), 611–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott (1990). Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 289–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992). The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensa, 251, 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delancey, Scott (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1(1), 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott (2012). Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 529–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery, 13(2), 60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Connie (2000). Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language, 24(3), 379–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (2007). Roman Jakobson and the two-dollar bills. Historiographia Linguistica, 34(2–3), 435–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Basic linguistic theory (Vol. 31). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon (2018). Egophoricity and argument structure in Cha’palaa. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 269–304). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Robert W. (2010). A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic language of Northwest China. PhD dissertation, The University of Buffalo, State University of New York.
Garrett, Edward J. (2001). Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
Gossner, Jan D. (1994). Aspects of Edolo Grammar. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
Hale, Austin (1980). Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Ronald L. Trail (Eds.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A, 53] (pp. 95–106). Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin, & Shrestha, Kedār P. (2006). Newār (Nepal Bhāsā). Lincom.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin, & Watters, David E. (1973). A survey of clause patterns. In Austin Hale & David E. Watters (Eds), Clause, Sentence, and Discourse Patterns in Selected Languages of Nepal, Part II (pp. 175–249). SIL and Tribhuvan University Press.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David (2005). Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics, 51, 1–48.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2012). ‘Mirativity’ does not exist: ḥdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn (2018). On egophoricity and mirativity in Kurtöp. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 109–137). John Benjamins. 〈 DOI logo〉Google Scholar
Jiang, Di, & Yue Ming. (2007). Tenses, aspects, and categories of evidentiality and egocentricity in spoken Lhasa Tibetan. Macrolinguistics, 1(1), 104–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Bryan F. (2004). A grammar of Sherpa. Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa (pp. 232–440). C. Genetti, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lidz, Liberty (2007). Evidentiality in Yongning Na (Mosuo). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 30(2), 45–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Egophoricity and differential access to knowledge in Yongning Na (Mosuo). In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 153–172). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Huiqiang (1983). The sketch of Ersu langauge. In Shaoming Li and Junbo Liu (Eds.), Studies on the Ersu Tibetan (pp.1–16). The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn (2009). A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne. 〈[URL]〉
Lum, Jonathon (2016). A conjunct-disjunct analysis of Dhivehi verbal morphology. The Symposium on Evidentiality, Egophoricity, and Engagement. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Miller, Amy (2001). A Grammar of Jamul Tipay. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne (1999). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norcliffe, Elisabeth (2018). Egophoricity and evidentiality in Guambiano (Nam Trik). In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 305–346). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. (1986). The evidential system of Kashaya. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (Eds), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20] (pp. 29–45). Ablex.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. (2007). A Grammar of Galo. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.
(2013). Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivations. In Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (Eds), Functional and Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103] (pp. 107–130). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren (2006). Ethical issues in linguistic fieldwork: An overview. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4(1), 123–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rule, W. M. (1977). A comparative study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila (2018). Egophoric patterns in Duna verbal morphology. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 405–436). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon, & Norcliffe, Elisabeth (2018). Egophoricity: An introduction. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 1–78). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandman, Erika (2018). Egophoricity in Wutun. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila S. Roque (Eds), Egophoricity (pp. 173–196). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schöttelndreyer, Burkhard (1980). Persons markers in Sherpa. Pacific Linguistics A, 531, 125–130.Google Scholar
Seyoum, Mulugeta (2008). A Grammar of Dime. LOT.Google Scholar
Slater, Keith W. (2003). A Grammar of Mangghuer. Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Strahm, Ester (1975). Clause patterns in Jirel. Collected Papers on Sherpa Jirel [Nepal Studies in Linguistics 2]. SIL & Institute of Nepal and Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai (1982). A sketch of Ersu (Tosu). Linguistic Study, 2 (3), 241–264.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T. (1993). Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 63(4), 945–1001.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas (1992). La déixis en tibétain: Quelques faits remarquables. In Mary Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (Eds), La Deixis: Colloque en Sorbonne, 8–9 juin 1990 (pp. 197–208). Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
(1996). L’ergativité en tibétain: approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Peeters.Google Scholar
(2008). Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Geburtstag, B. Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (Eds), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65 1 (pp. 281–308). VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Vesalainen, Olavi, & Vesalainen, Marja (1980). Clause Patterns in Lhomi. Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wang, Dehe, Wang, Ke, Wang, Xuan, Chirkova, Katia & Gu, Tao (2020). A Collection of Ersu Vocabulary. Anhui University Press.Google Scholar
Watters, David (2006). The conjunct-disjunct distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics, 221, 300–319.Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel, & Zúñiga, Fernando (2017). Egophoricity, involvement, and semantic roles in Tibeto-Burman languages. Open Linguistics, 31, 419–441. 〈 DOI logo〉Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. (1986). Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (Eds), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (pp. 188–202). Ablex.Google Scholar
Yu, Dominic (2012). Proto-Ersuic. PhD dissertation, University of California.
Zhang, Sihong (2014a). Numeral classifiers in Ersu. Language and Linguistics, 15 (6), 883–915.Google Scholar
(2014b). The expression of knowledge in Ersu. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-linguistic Typology (pp.132–147). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). A reference grammar of Ersu, a Tibetan-Burman language of China. Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
(2022). Imbuing words with power in Ersu. In Anne Storch & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Art of Language (pp. 188–203). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Sihong, & Wang, Xuan (2017). A study of verb-based reduplication in Yuexi Ersu. Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 44(2),163–169.Google Scholar
Zhang, Sihong, & Yu, Chenglin (2017). Existential and possessive verbs in Ersu and their typological significance. Minority Languages of China, 31, 54–67.Google Scholar
Zhang, Sihong, Sun, Hongkai & Wang, Dehe (2018). Adjectives as a separate word class in Ersu. Studies on Languages and Linguistics, 38 (1), 101–117.Google Scholar