Article published in:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp. 2645

Full-text

A corpus-based analysis of so in written discourse: A comparison between L1 English speakers and Japanese EFL learners
References

References

Anthony, L.
(2014) AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software
Babanoğlu, P. M.
(2014) A corpus-based study on the use of pragmatic markers as speech-like features in Turkish EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 186–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D.
(1988) “So” as a constraint on relevance. In R. Kempson (Ed.), Mental representation: The interface between language and reality (pp. 183–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolden, G. B.
(2006) Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 661–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) “So what’s up?’’: Using the discourse marker “so’’ to launch conversational business. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(3), 302–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker “so” in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 974–998. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, L.
(2007) Discourse marker so in the English of Flemish university students. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, 5, 79–95.Google Scholar
(2012)  So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1764–1782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapetón Castro, C. M.
(2009) The use and functions of discourse markers in EFL classroom interaction. Profile, 11, 57–77. Available from: http://​www​.scielo​.org​.co​/scielo​.php​?script​=sci​_arttext​&pid​=S1657​-07902009000100005​&lng​=en​&tlng​=en
Ding, R., & Wang, L.
(2015) Discourse markers in local and native English teachers’ talk in Hong Kong EFL classroom interaction: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5), 65–75.Google Scholar
Fraser, B.
(1988) Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 38(1–4), 19–33.Google Scholar
(1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 383–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6(2), 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fung, L., & Carter, R.
(2007) Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and non-native use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28, 410–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hays, P. R.
(1992) Discourse markers and L2 acquisition. Papers in Applied Linguistics, 7, 24–34.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A.
(2007) Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 157–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
House, J.
(2013) Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 57–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howe, L.
(1991) Topic change in conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, S.
(2013) The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world 1, 91–118. Kobe: Kobe UniversityGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A.
(2002) So..?: Pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 91–110). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lam, P. W. Y.
(2009) The effect of text type on the use of so as a discourse particle. Discourse Studies, 11, 353–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Toward a functional framework for discourse particles: A comparison of well and so. Text and Talk, 30(6), 657–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, J.
(2016) Discourse marker so: A comparison between English language Learners and English-dominant speakers (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
Liu, B.
(2017) The use of discourse markers but and so by native English speakers and Chinese speakers of English. Pragmatics, 27(4), 479–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsui, T.
(2002) Semantics and pragmatics of a Japanese discourse marker dakara (so/in other words): A unitary account. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(7), 867–891. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, S.
(1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S.
(2005) Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Raymond, G.
(2004) Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, G.
(2006) Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In K. Fischer (Ed.). Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 339–358). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Romero Trillo, J.
(2002) The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 769–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, M.
(2006) A blurring of categorization: The Japanese connective de in spontaneous conversation. Discourse Studies, 8(29), 303–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers (Studies in interactional sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L.
(1999) Discourse markers. Lingua, 107, 227–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1995) Collins COBUILD English dictionary. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dijik, T.
(1979) Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 447–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vickov, G., & Jakupčević, E.
(2017) Discourse markers in non-native EFL teacher talk. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 649–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Magliacane, Annarita
2020. Erasmus students in an Irish studyabroad context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:1  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.