Article published in:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp. 6891
Ament, J. R., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
(2015) Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A.
(1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(1), 68–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, P., & Daniel, A.
(2002) How effective is late partial immersion? Some findings from a secondary school program in Germany. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 499–516). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Triet.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H.
(2012a) The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 121–142). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 5–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fragai, E.
(2001) La programmazione didattica: Il Glotto-Kit come strumento per valutare i liv- elli in entrata. In M. Barni & A. Villarini (Eds.), La questione della lingua per gli immigrati stranieri. Insegnare, valutare e certificare l’Italiano L2 (pp. 191–208). Milan, IT: Franco Angeli Editore.Google Scholar
(2003) Valutare la competenza linguistico-comunicativa in italiano L2: Il Glotto-Kit per bambini e adolescenti stranieri. Didattica & Classe Plurilingue, 71, 1–5.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G.
(1987) Tests of oral performance: The need for data-based criteria. ELT Journal, 41(4), 287–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Taguchi, N.
(2018) Task complexity effects on interaction during a collaborative persuasive writing task: A conversation analytic perspective. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics (pp. 84–109). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantic, Vol. 31 (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Q.
(2009) Maturity and interculturality: Chinese students’ experience in UK higher education. European Journal of Education, 44(1), 37–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herraiz-Martinez, A., & Alcón-Soler, E.
(2018) English-medium instruction and functional adequacy in L2 writing. In A. Sánchez-Hernández & A. Herraiz-Martinez (Eds.), Learning second language pragmatics beyond traditional contexts (pp. 145–170). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Housen, A.
(2012) Time and amount of L2 contact inside and outside the school: Insights from European schools. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 111–140). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huizhu, J. H.
(2012) Mutual influences between learners’ identity construction and English language learning in the first year of university study in China. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The University of Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
Knoch, U.
(2009) Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales. Language Testing, 26(2), 275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing, 16(2), 81–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2017) Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., & Gilabert, R.
(2010) Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 81–100). Eurosla Monographs Series 1.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N.
(1991) Étude des effets à long terme de l’apprentissage intensif de l’anglais, langue seconde, au primaire. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48(1), 90–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loranc-Paszylk, B.
(2007) Evaluation of foreign language achievement based upon a CLIL programme in tertiary education: A Polish perspective. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (Eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education. Maastrich, The Netherlands: Maastricht University Language Centre.Google Scholar
Martín-Laguna, S.
(2018) Learning pragmatics in the multilingual classroom: Exploring multicompetence across types of discourse-pragmatic markers. In A. Sánchez-Hernández & A. Herraiz-Martínez (Eds.) Learning second language pragmatics beyond traditional contexts (pp. 205–223). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McNamara, T., & Roever, C.
(2007) Language testing: The social dimension. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. S.
(2001) A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment in Japanese as a foreign language. In G. Kasper & K. Rose (Eds.), Pragmatics and language teaching (pp.103–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G.
(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E.
(2016) The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848.Google Scholar
Salaberri, M. S., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. M.
(2015) Analyzing writing in English-medium instruction at university. Linguarum Arena, 61, 45–58.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Hernández, A.
(2017) Acculturation and acquisition of pragmatic routines in the study abroad context (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T.
(2012) The contribution of test-takers’ speech content to scores on an English oral proficiency test. Language Testing, 29(2), 223–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1993) Consciousness, learning, and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21–42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C.
(2007) Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35(3), 305–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheela, S. K., & Ravikumar, K.
(2016) The importance of exposure in learning English as a second language: Strategies to be employed to improve the students’ language exposure in the context of rapid changes in the field of technology. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 4(2), 770–774.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2012) Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. New York/Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) ‘Contextually’ speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class, and online. System, 481, 3–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Naganuma, N., & Budding, C.
(2015) Does instruction alter the naturalistic pattern of pragmatic development? A case of request speech act. TESL-EJ, 19(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
UCLES (University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate)
(2001) Quick placement test. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Upshur, J. A., & Turner, C. E.
(1995) Constructing rating scales for second language tests. ELT Journal, 49(1), 3–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Usó-Juan, E., & Martínez-Flor, A.
(2006) Approaches to language learning and teaching: Towards acquiring communicative competence through the four skills. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 3–26). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, R.
(2010) The effectiveness of using English as the sole medium of instruction in English classes: Student responses and improved English proficiency. Porta Linguarum, 131, 119–130.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. J., & Yan, R.
(2012) Impact of immersion teaching on English sociopragmatic awareness of Chinese kindergarten children: A polite study. International Education, 41(2), 33–45.Google Scholar


Pragmatic outcomes in the English-medium instruction context
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder
2022. Measurement of functional adequacy in different learning contexts. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1  pp. 8 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.