Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Describing and assessing interactional competence in a second language: Special issue of the journal of Applied Pragmatics 5:2 (2023)
Edited by Emma Betz, Taiane Malabarba and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Applied Pragmatics 5:2] 2023
► pp. 234–239
Commentary

Challenges of assessing interactional competence

ORCID logo | The Pennsylvania State University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Challenges of CA-SLA for L2 assessment
  • 3.Moving forward
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 24 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00015.hal
References (13)
References
Couper–Kuhlen, E. (2014). What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics, 24 (3), 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper–Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., et al. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLOS ONE, 10 (9). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2014). Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. In D. Dor, C. Knight, & J. Lewis (Eds.), The social origins of language (pp. 92–104). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. K. (2018). From interactional competence to interactional repertoires: Reconceptualizing the goal of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1), 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). The contributions of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to a usage-based understanding of language: Expanding the transdisciplinary framework. The Modern Language Journal, 103 (51), ( supplement ), 80–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. (2017). Using conversation analysis in the lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50 (1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (2006). On the human ‘Interaction Engine’. In N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 39–69). Berg.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51–77). Ablex.Google Scholar
(2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In by N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 70–96). Berg.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2019). The dual personality of ‘topic’ in the IELTS Speaking Test. ELT Journal, 73 (3), 247–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (1), 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar