Article published in:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp. 26–53

Proficiency effects on L2 Arabic refusals

Appropriateness, linguistic strategies and multidialectal practices

| Carnegie Mellon University
| Carnegie Mellon University
| Palestine Polytechnic University
This study examined the relationship between L2 proficiency and (1) appropriateness of refusals, (2) use of refusal strategies, and (3) multidialectal practices in performing refusals in Arabic. Using a spoken discourse completion task (spoken DCT), data were collected from 45 learners of Arabic at three different proficiency levels and from 15 Arabic native speakers. The situations used in the spoken DCT varied in power and social distance (i.e., refusing a friend’s request to lend money, refusing a neighbor’s request to lend a car, and refusing a boss’s request to stay late to work extra hours). Findings generally revealed a positive relationship between proficiency and L2 Arabic learners’ appropriateness, use of refusal strategies, and multidialectal practices in their refusals. However, results showed that native speakers solely employed spoken Arabic (i.e., the dialect), while learners relied heavily on Modern Standard Arabic. Analysis of refusal strategies showed that native speakers tended to provide vague explanations in their refusals except when refusing the neighbor’s request, whereas the learners preferred to provide specific reasons for their refusals. Moreover, advanced-level learners were substantially verbose; as a result, their refusals could be perceived as lecturing or criticizing their interlocutor. This paper concludes with implications for researching and teaching L2 Arabic refusals with special attention to multidialectal practices.
Keywords: pragmatic competence, refusal strategies, L2 Arabic, proficiency, multidialectal practices, interlanguage pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instrument
      • 3.2.1‘Friend’ situation (−Power, −Distance)
      • 3.2.2‘Boss’ situation (+Power, +Distance)
      • 3.2.3‘Neighbor’ situation (−Power, + Distance)
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Analysis of appropriateness ratings
    • 4.2Analysis of linguistic strategies
      • 4.2.1Refusing to lend money to a friend (−P, −D)
      • 4.2.2Refusing boss’s request to stay late and work extra hours (+P, +D)
      • 4.2.3Refusing to lend car to a neighbor (−P, +D)
    • 4.3The Use of multidialectal and multilingual practices (MSA, spoken Arabic, and English)
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Pedagogical implications
  • 7.Conclusion and future directions
  • References
Published online: 10 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.19007.mas
References
Al Masaeed, K.
(2017) Interlanguage pragmatic development: Internal and external modification in L2 Arabic requests. Foreign Language Annals, 50(4), 808–820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Al Masaeed, K., Waugh, L., & Burns, K.
(2018) The development of interlanguage pragmatics in L2 Arabic: The production of apology strategies. System, 741, 98–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Al Masaeed, K.
forthcoming). Translanguaging in L2 Arabic study abroad: Beyond monolingual practices in institutional talk. Modern Language Journal.
Al-Batal, M.
(Ed.) (2018) Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
(2014a) Insert and post-expansion in L2 Arabic requests. System, 421, 189–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Preference structure in L2 Arabic requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 111, 619–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015a) The development of requests by L2 learners of Modern Standard Arabic: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Foreign Language Annals, 481, 570–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Multiple requests in Arabic as a second language. Multilingua, 34(3), 405–432.Google Scholar
(2018) Proficiency and preference organization in second language refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 1291, 140–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Al-Issa, A.
(2003) Sociocultural transfer in L2 speech behaviors: Evidence and motivation factors. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 201, 581–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Al-Shalawi, H.
(1997) Refusal strategies in Saudi and American cultures. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (304398108).Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F.
(1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.
(1993) Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 151, 279–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R.
(1990) Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Anderson, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M., & Waring, H. Z.
(2005) Pragmatic development in responding to rudeness. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 67–80). Boston, MA: Thomson/Heinle.Google Scholar
Bella, S.
(2014) Developing the ability to refuse: A cross-sectional study of Greek FL refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 611, 35–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G.
(1993) Perception and performance in native and nonnative apology. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 82–107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. D.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brustad, K., Al-Batal, M., & Al-Tonsi, A.
(1995a) Al-kitaab fii ta’allum Al-’Arabiyya, Part 1 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1995b) Al-kitaab fii ta’allum Al-’Arabiyya, Part 2 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1995c) Al-kitaab fii ta’allum Al-’Arabiyya, Part 3 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Al-Kitaab fii ta’allum Al-’Arabiyya: A textbook for Arabic, Part 1 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M.
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N.
(2018) Second language pragmatics: From theory to practice. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, W., & House, J.
(1991) Do learners talk too much? The waffle phenomenon in interlanguage pragmatics. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. S. Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 273–286). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.
(2003) Declining an invitation: A cross-cultural study of pragmatic strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish. Multilingua, 22(3), 225–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Perceptions of refusals to invitations: Exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness, 171, 195–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In E. Usó Juán & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues (pp. 41–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flores Salgado, E.
(2011) The pragmatics of requests and apologies: Developmental patterns of Mexican students. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. & Houck, N.
(1999) Interlanguage refusals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1971) On communicative competence. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G.
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Li, S.
(2014) The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System, 451, 103–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morkus, N.
(2018) Negative pragmatic transfer and language proficiency: American learners of Arabic. The Language Learning Journal. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. L., Carson, J., Al-Batal, M., & El Bakary, W.
(2002) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Strategy use in Egyptian Arabic and American English refusals. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 163–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R.
(2000) An exploratory cross-sectional study on interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 27–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryding, K. C.
(2006) Teaching Arabic in the United States. In K. M. Wahba, Z. A. Taha, & L. England (Eds.), Handbook for Arabic language teaching professionals in the 21st century (pp. 13–20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Salazar-Campillo, P., Safont-Jordà, P. M., & Codina-Espurz, V.
(2009) Refusal strategies: A proposal from a sociopragmatic approach. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 81, 139–150.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shiri, S.
(2013) Learners’ attitudes toward regional dialects and destination preferences in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 565–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2013) Refusals in L2 English: Proficiency effects on appropriateness and fluency. In P. Salazar-Campillo & O. A. Marti (Eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond (pp. 101–119). Spain: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Interlanguage pragmatics: A historical sketch and future directions. In A. Barron, P. Grundy, & G. Yueguo (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 153–167). Oxford: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Advanced pragmatic competence. In P. A. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 505–526). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2019) The Routledge handbook of Second Language Acquisition and pragmatics. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T., & Beebe, L. M.
(1987) The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal, 81, 131–155.Google Scholar
Younes, M.
(2015) The integrated approach to Arabic instruction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

AL MASAEED, KHALED
2020. Translanguaging in L2 Arabic Study Abroad: Beyond Monolingual Practices in Institutional Talk. The Modern Language Journal 104:1 ► pp. 250 ff. Crossref logo
Al Masaeed, Khaled
2022. Bidialectal Practices and L2 Arabic Pragmatic Development in a Short-Term Study Abroad. Applied Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 88 ff. Crossref logo
Al‐Gahtani, Saad
2022. The development of L2 interactional competence in Arabic: The case of multiple requests. Foreign Language Annals Crossref logo
Nassif, Lama & Khaled Al Masaeed
2020. Supporting the sociolinguistic repertoire of emergent diglossic speakers: multidialectal practices of L2 Arabic learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Saleem, Tahir, Uzma Anjum & Summiya Tahir
2021. The Sociopragmatic and Pragmalinguistic Strategies in L2 Pragmatic Competence: A Case of Pakistani ESL Learners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 50:2 ► pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Saleem, Tahir, Uzma Unjum, Munawar Iqbal Ahmed, Ayaz Qadeer & Krisda Chaemsaithong
2021. Social distance and speech behavior: A case of Pakistani English speakers’ apology responses. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.