Cover not available
Article published In:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp.26–50

Codeswitching between Modern Standard and Colloquial Arabic as L2 sociolinguistic competence

A cross-sectional study from an integrated approach curriculum

| Williams College, USA
Multidialectal use of Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Colloquial Arabic (CA) has become standard practice among Arabic speakers. Therefore, a question facing Arabic instructors and curriculum planners is what methods to adopt to raise learners’ awareness of this sociolinguistic reality. Some programs introduce MSA and one variety of CA from the beginning of Arabic instruction. However, the question of how learners who receive multidialectal training use MSA and CA simultaneously in their speech productions and how their MSA–CA use evolves over their years of Arabic study remains under-researched. The current study addressed these questions by studying the speech productions of 51 second language (L2) Arabic learners enrolled in three years of Arabic instruction. The data show that the participants consistently code-switched between MSA and CA, and seemed to conform to sociocultural norms designating MSA as more formal and CA as more personal and intimate. As learners’ proficiency levels increased, a wider range of sociolinguistic functions was observed. The study reinforces the importance of L2 Arabic curricula decisions that embrace the multidialectal use of Arabic in the L2 Arabic classroom and asserts learners’ ability to use MSA and CA simultaneously.
Keywords: language varieties, language attitudes, communicative language learning, teacher training
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1MSA and CA use in the speech of Arabic speakers
    • 2.2MSA and CA use in L2 Arabic curricula
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Study design and tasks
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1First-year productions
      • 4.1.1Patterns of MSA use
      • 4.1.2Patterns of CA use
    • 4.2Second-year productions
      • 4.2.1Patterns of MSA use
      • 4.2.2Patterns of CA use
    • 4.3Third-year productions
      • 4.3.1Patterns of MSA use
      • 4.3.2Patterns of CA use
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Common patterns across learner groups
    • 5.2Patterns within learner groups
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.19022.nas
References (55)
References
Alaiyed, M. A. S. (2018). Diglossic code-switching between standard Arabic and Najdi Arabic in religious Discourse [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Durham University.
Al Alaslaa, S. (2018). A Sociolinguistic study of code choice among Saudis on Twitter [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Michigan.
Al-Batal, M. (1992). Diglossia proficiency: The need for an alternative approach to teaching. In A. Rouchdy (Ed.), The Arabic language in America (pp. 284–304). Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
(2018). Dialect integration in the Arabic foreign language curriculum: Vision, rationale, and models. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 3–22). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Batal, M., & Belnap, R. K. (2006). The teaching and learning of Arabic in the United States: Realities, needs, and future directions. In K. M. Wahba, Z. A. Taha, & L. England (Eds.), The handbook for Arabic language teaching professionals in the 21st century (pp. 389–399). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Al-Batal, M. & Glakas, C. (2018). Dialect integration: Students’ perspectives within an integrated program. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 260–278). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Albirini, A. (2011). The sociolinguistic functions of codeswitching between Standard Arabic and Dialectal Arabic. Language in Society, 40(5), 537–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al Masaeed, K. (2020). Translanguaging in L2 Arabic study abroad: Beyond monolingual practices in institutional talk. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 250–266.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2006). Functions of code-switching in Egypt: Evidence from monologues. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Arabic sociolinguistics: Topics in diglossia, gender, identity, and politics. Georgetown University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Politicizing identity: Code choice and stance-taking during the Egyptian revolution. Discourse & Society, 23(2), 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The social motivation of code-switching in mosque sermons in Egypt. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2201, 49–66.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2002). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belnap, R. K. (2018). Lessons learned and empirical data from twenty years of using an integrated approach. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 36–53). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Boussofara-Omar, N. (2006). Neither third language nor middle varieties but diglossic switching. Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik, 451, 55–80.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J. M. (2004). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in French as a foreign language: An overview. Journal of French Language Studies, 14(3), 301–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eid, M. (1988). Principles for codeswitching between Standard and Egyptian Arabic. Al-ʿArabiyya, 211, 15–79.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 151, 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, L. M., & Beaulieu, S. (2016). Effects of sociolinguistic awareness on French L2 learners’ planned and unplanned oral production of stylistic variation. Language Awareness, 25(1–2), 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. (1997). Accommodation theory. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: A reader and coursebook (pp. 232–239). Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies (Vol. 11). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holes, C. (1993). The uses of variation: A study of the political speeches of Gamal Abd Al-Nasir. Amesterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series, 41, 13–45.Google Scholar
(2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Huntley, E. (2018). Preparing students for the future: Integrating dialect and standard into the Arabic foreign language classroom. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 73–89). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Husseinali, G. (2006). Who is studying Arabic and why? A survey of Arabic students’ orientations at a major university. Foreign Language Annals, 39(3), 395–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isleem, M. (2018). Integrating colloquial Arabic in the classroom: A study of students’ and teachers’ attitudes and effects. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 237–259). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (2010). Style shifts among Japanese learners before and after study abroad in Japan: Becoming active social agents in Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 45–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19(3), 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, H., & O’Brien, M. G. (2014). Perceptual dialectology in second language learners of German. System, 461, 151–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leddy-Cecere, T. (2018). Diverse speaker output in the integrated Arabic classroom: Trends and interpretation. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 199–220). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2011). Diglossia, code switching; style variation; and congruence: Notions for analyzing mixed Arabic. Al-ʿArabiyya, 441, 29–39.Google Scholar
Najour, C. (2018). Teachers’ voices: Analysis of teachers’ speech and teachers’ perspective in integrated Arabic classrooms. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 298–317). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Nakatsukasa, K., & Loewen, L. (2015). A teacher’s first language use in form-focused episodes In Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 191, 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassif, L. (2018). Integrated colloquial Arabic into the Arabic L2 curriculum: An analysis of learner speech. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 175–198). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Nassif, L., & Al Masaeed, K. (2020). Supporting the sociolinguistic repertoire of emergent diglossic speakers: Multidialectal practices of L2 Arabic learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, J. (2007). Arabic diglossia: Teaching only the standard variety is a disservice to students. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 141, 111–122.Google Scholar
Ryding, K. (2013). Teaching and learning Arabic as a foreign language: A Guide for teachers. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Saeed, Aziz (1997). The pragmatics of codeswitching Fusha Arabic to Aammiyyah Arabic in religious oriented discourse [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ball State University.Google Scholar
Shiri, S. (2013). Learners’ attitudes toward regional dialects and destination preferences in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 565–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a). The homestay in intensive language study abroad: Social networks, language socialization, and developing intercultural competence. Foreign Language Annals, 48(4), 541–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Intercultural communicative competence development during and after language study abroad: Insights from Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 48(1), 5–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simard, D., & Jean, G. (2011). An exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions devised to draw L2 learners’ attention to form. Language Learning, 61(3), 759–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soliman, A. (2008). The changing role of Arabic in religious discourse: A sociolinguistic study of Egyptian Arabic [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Weber, A. (2016). Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom based study. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 341–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64(3), 549–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The effect of instruction on language learners’ sociolinguistic awareness: An empirical study with pedagogical implications. System, 41(2), 298–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, K. (2001). Linguistic contacts between Arabic and other languages. Arabica, 48(4), 470–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Younes, M. (1995). Elementary Arabic: Integrated approach: Student Workbook. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2015). The integrated approach to Arabic instruction. Routledge.Google Scholar
(2018). To separate or to integrate, that is the question: The Cornell Arabic program model. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 23–35). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zaki, M. & Palmer, J. (2018). Integration and students’ perspectives in a multidialectal environment. In M. Al-Batal (Ed.), Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum (pp. 279–297). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Nassif, Lama & Shawna Shapiro
2023. Sociolinguistic awareness in L2 Arabic: A study of learners' code use repertoires. Foreign Language Annals 56:4 ► pp. 1013 ff. DOI logo
Al‐Gahtani, Saad
2022. The development of L2 interactional competence in Arabic: The case of multiple requests. Foreign Language Annals 55:2 ► pp. 610 ff. DOI logo
Nassif, Lama & Khaled Al Masaeed
2022. Supporting the sociolinguistic repertoire of emergent diglossic speakers: multidialectal practices of L2 Arabic learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 43:8 ► pp. 759 ff. DOI logo
Al-Abbas, Linda S., Ahmad S. Haider & Maria del Mar and Sanchez Ramos
2021. Using Modern Standard Arabic in subtitling Egyptian comedy movies for the deaf/ hard of hearing. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.