Article published in:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 3:2 (2021) ► pp. 163194


Achiba, M.
(2003) Learning to request in a second language: Child interlanguage pragmatics. Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, C., Lockton, E., & Collins, A.
(2018) Metapragmatic explicitation and social attribution in social communication disorder and developmental language disorder: A comparative study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 611, 604–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, J.
(1991) French children’s conception of requests: The development of metapragmatic knowledge. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(3), 285–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, J., Laval, V., & Chaminaud, S.
(2007) Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 2115–2132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
(Eds.) (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.Google Scholar
Bosco, F. M., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G.
(2006) Recognition and repair of communicative failures: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 381, 1398–1429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buson, L., & Billiez, J.
(2013) Representations of stylistic variation in 9- to 11-year-olds: Cognitive processes and salience. Linguistics, 51(2), 325–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., Hody, A., & Calmus, A.
(2012) Theory of mind and irony comprehension in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 331, 1380–1388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. F.
(2016) Apologizing in Mandarin Chinese: A study on developmental patterns. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 42(1), 73–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The effect of an interlocutor’s social status on the use of apology strategies: A cross-sectional study. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 44(1), 89–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A., Lockton, E., & Adams, C.
(2014) Metapragmatic explicitation ability in children with typical language development: Development and validation of a novel clinical assessment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 521, 31–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, H., Huser, C., & Myers, C.
(2014) The use of participatory methods in researching the experiences of children and young people. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(2), 51–66.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N.
(2018) Second language pragmatics. From Theory to Research. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dittrich, W., Johansen, T., & Kulinskaya, E.
(2011) Norms and situational rules of address in English and Norwegian speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3807–3821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, I.
(2018) Reading in the second language classroom: Consideration of first language approaches in second language contexts. Acta Didactica Norge, 12(2), Art. 10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, I., & Hasselgreen, A.
(2008) Young language learner (YLL) research: An overview of some international and national approaches. Acta Didactica Norge, 2(1), Art. 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J.
(2005) Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education, 19(4), 281–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasselgreen, A.
(2005) The new læreplan proposal for English – reading between the lines. Språk og språkundervisning 2(5), 7–10.Google Scholar
Hsieh, S. C. Y., & Hsu, C. C. N.
(2010) Idiom comprehension in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 391, 505–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, N.
(2013) Is it rude language? Children learning pragmatics through visual narratives. TESL Canada Journal, 30(7), 135–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A.
(1998) Theorizing childhood. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lacroix, A., Aguert, M., Dardier, V., Stojanovik, V., & Laval, V.
(2010) Idiom comprehension in French-speaking children and adolescents with Williams’ syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(2), 608–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laval, V.
(2003) Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 351, 723–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.
(2010) An exploratory study of the interlanguage pragmatic comprehension of young learners of English. Pragmatics, 20(3), 343–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lockton, E., Adams, C., & Collins, A.
(2016) Do children with social communication disorder have explicit knowledge of pragmatic rules they break? A comparison of conversational pragmatic ability and metapragmatic awareness. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(5), 508–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConachy, T.
(2018) Developing intercultural perspectives on language use. Exploring pragmatics and culture in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McConachy, T., & Liddicoat, A. J.
(2016) Meta-pragmatic awareness and intercultural competence: The role of reflection and interpretation in intercultural mediation. In F. Dervin & Z. Gross (Eds.), Intercultural competence in education: Alternative approaches for different times (pp. 13). Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKay, A.
(2006) Assessing young language learners. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Kane, C.
(2008) The development of participatory techniques. Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children. Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 125–155). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinter, A.
(2014) Child participant roles in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 168–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A., & Zandian, S.
(2014) ‘I don’t ever want to leave this room’: Benefits of researching ‘with’ children. ELT Journal, 68(1), 64–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Punch, S.
(2002a) Interviewing strategies with young people: The ‘secret box’, stimulus material and task-based activities. Children and Society, 161, 45–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
QSR International Pty Ltd
Rose, K.
(2000) An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatics development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 27–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2345–2364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Save the Children Norway
(2008) A kit of tools for participatory research and evaluation with children, young people and adults. Retrieved on 28 June 2021 from https://​resourcecentre​.savethechildren​.net​/sites​/default​/files​/documents​/kit​-of​-tools​_1​.pdf
Savić, M., Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Myrset, A.
(2021) Young Greek Cypriot and Norwegian EFL learners: Pragmalinguistic development in request production. Journal of Pragmatics, 1801, 15–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savić, M. & Myrset, A.
forthcoming A). “But in England they’re certainly very polite, so you mustn’t forget that”: Young EFL learners making sense of pragmatic practices. In T. McConachy & A. J. Liddicoat Eds. Teaching and learning second language pragmatics for intercultural understanding Routledge
Savić, M., & Myrset, A.
forthcoming B). “Hey, you, can I loan your yellow pencil?” Young Norwegian EFL learners’ metapragmatic appraisal of requests. In N. Halenko & J. Wang Eds. Pragmatics and English language learning Cambridge University Press
Steiner, M.
(1993) Learning from experience: World studies in the primary curriculum. Trentham.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
(2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, C., & Ortlieb, E.
(2018) Implementing readers theater in secondary classrooms. Reading Psychology, 39(8), 879–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., & Yan, R.
(2012) Impact of immersion teaching on English sociopragmatic awareness of Chinese kindergarten children: A polite study. International Education, 41(2), 33–45.Google Scholar