The aim of this paper is two-fold: firstly, to provide an overview of the methods used to elicit metapragmatic data in research with young language learners through a systematic review; and secondly, to present three data collection techniques designed and used in two research projects conducted by the authors, and examine their affordances for eliciting metapragmatic data. The systematic review revealed that data elicitation techniques employed in metapragmatics research with children closely reflected those widely employed in research with (young) adults (Culpeper, Mackey & Taguchi, 2018). Against this backdrop, the paper presents three elicitation techniques, developed based on the literature on the methodological considerations for conducting research with children (e.g. O’Kane, 2008; Pinter, 2014; Punch, 2002a, 2002b): the Emoticon task, the Ranking circle, and Readers Theatre. After describing the techniques and presenting the metapragmatic discussions elicited through them, the paper calls for the inclusion of innovative, participant-friendly methods in interlanguage pragmatics research focusing on children’s metapragmatic awareness.
Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to request in a second language: Child interlanguage pragmatics. Multilingual Matters.
Adams, C., Lockton, E., & Collins, A. (2018). Metapragmatic explicitation and social attribution in social communication disorder and developmental language disorder: A comparative study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 611, 604–618.
Bernicot, J. (1991). French children’s conception of requests: The development of metapragmatic knowledge. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(3), 285–304.
Bernicot, J., Laval, V., & Chaminaud, S. (2007). Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics?Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 2115–2132.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.
Bosco, F. M., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G. (2006). Recognition and repair of communicative failures: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 381, 1398–1429.
Buson, L., & Billiez, J. (2013). Representations of stylistic variation in 9- to 11-year-olds: Cognitive processes and salience. Linguistics, 51(2), 325–354.
Caillies, S., Hody, A., & Calmus, A. (2012). Theory of mind and irony comprehension in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 331, 1380–1388.
Chang, Y. F. (2016). Apologizing in Mandarin Chinese: A study on developmental patterns. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 42(1), 73–101.
Chang, Y. F. (2018). The effect of an interlocutor’s social status on the use of apology strategies: A cross-sectional study. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 44(1), 89–122.
Collins, A., Lockton, E., & Adams, C. (2014). Metapragmatic explicitation ability in children with typical language development: Development and validation of a novel clinical assessment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 521, 31–43.
Cowie, H., Huser, C., & Myers, C. (2014). The use of participatory methods in researching the experiences of children and young people. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(2), 51–66.
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics. From Theory to Research. Routledge.
Dittrich, W., Johansen, T., & Kulinskaya, E. (2011). Norms and situational rules of address in English and Norwegian speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3807–3821.
Drew, I. (2018). Reading in the second language classroom: Consideration of first language approaches in second language contexts. Acta Didactica Norge, 12(2), Art. 10.
Drew, I., & Hasselgreen, A. (2008). Young language learner (YLL) research: An overview of some international and national approaches. Acta Didactica Norge, 2(1), Art. 5.
Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2005). Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education, 19(4), 281–303.
Hasselgreen, A. (2005). The new læreplan proposal for English – reading between the lines. Språk og språkundervisning 2(5), 7–10.
Hsieh, S. C. Y., & Hsu, C. C. N. (2010). Idiom comprehension in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 391, 505–522.
Ishihara, N. (2013). Is it rude language? Children learning pragmatics through visual narratives. TESL Canada Journal, 30(7), 135–149.
James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Polity Press.
Lacroix, A., Aguert, M., Dardier, V., Stojanovik, V., & Laval, V. (2010). Idiom comprehension in French-speaking children and adolescents with Williams’ syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(2), 608–616.
Laval, V. (2003). Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 351, 723–739.
Lockton, E., Adams, C., & Collins, A. (2016). Do children with social communication disorder have explicit knowledge of pragmatic rules they break? A comparison of conversational pragmatic ability and metapragmatic awareness. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(5), 508–517.
McConachy, T. (2018). Developing intercultural perspectives on language use. Exploring pragmatics and culture in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.
McConachy, T., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2016). Meta-pragmatic awareness and intercultural competence: The role of reflection and interpretation in intercultural mediation. In F. Dervin & Z. Gross (Eds.), Intercultural competence in education: Alternative approaches for different times (pp. 13). Palgrave Macmillan.
McKay, A. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge University Press.
O’Kane, C. (2008). The development of participatory techniques. Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children. Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 125–155). Routledge.
Pinter, A. (2014). Child participant roles in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 168–183.
Pinter, A., & Zandian, S. (2014). ‘I don’t ever want to leave this room’: Benefits of researching ‘with’ children. ELT Journal, 68(1), 64–74.
Punch, S. (2002a). Interviewing strategies with young people: The ‘secret box’, stimulus material and task-based activities. Children and Society, 161, 45–56.
Punch, S. (2002b). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults?Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2015). NVivo (Version 11). Retrieved on 28 June from [URL]
Rose, K. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatics development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 27–67.
Rose, K. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2345–2364.
Save the Children Norway. (2008). A kit of tools for participatory research and evaluation with children, young people and adults. Retrieved on 28 June 2021 from [URL]
Savić, M., Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). Young Greek Cypriot and Norwegian EFL learners: Pragmalinguistic development in request production. Journal of Pragmatics, 1801, 15–34.
Savić, M. & Myrset, A. (forthcoming A). “But in England they’re certainly very polite, so you mustn’t forget that”: Young EFL learners making sense of pragmatic practices. In T. McConachy & A. J. Liddicoat (Eds.), Teaching and learning second language pragmatics for intercultural understanding. Routledge.
Savić, M., & Myrset, A. (forthcoming B). “Hey, you, can I loan your yellow pencil?” Young Norwegian EFL learners’ metapragmatic appraisal of requests. In N. Halenko & J. Wang (Eds.), Pragmatics and English language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, M. (1993). Learning from experience: World studies in the primary curriculum. Trentham.
Young, C., & Ortlieb, E. (2018). Implementing readers theater in secondary classrooms. Reading Psychology, 39(8), 879–897.
Zhang, L., & Yan, R. (2012). Impact of immersion teaching on English sociopragmatic awareness of Chinese kindergarten children: A polite study. International Education, 41(2), 33–45.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Martinez-Buffa, Ignacio & Pilar Safont
2023. Multilingual pragmatic awareness in collaborative writing. Language Awareness 32:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Myrset, Anders
2022. ‘You could win Masterchef with this soup. Can I get some more?’ Request production and the impact of instruction on young EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics 192 ► pp. 56 ff.
Myrset, Anders & Troy McConachy
2022. Incorporating Pragmatics into Primary English Language Teacher Education. In Innovative Practices in Early English Language Education, ► pp. 305 ff.
Savić, Milica, Anders Myrset & Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis
2022. Lived experiences as a resource for scaffolding metapragmatic understandings with young language learners. The Language Learning Journal 50:4 ► pp. 475 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.